1 / 63

Internal Organisation

Internal Organisation. Higher Business Management. What is an organisation?. A group of people working towards a defined set of goals and objectives.

rwerner
Download Presentation

Internal Organisation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internal Organisation Higher Business Management

  2. What is an organisation? • A group of people working towards a defined set of goals and objectives.

  3. ‘An organisation is the rational co-ordination of the activities of a number of people for the achievement of some common explicit purpose or goal, through the division of labour and a hierarchy of authority.’ Edgar Schein

  4. Types of organisational grouping • Functional • Product/service • Customer • Place/territory • Technology • Line/staff

  5. Functional grouping • Departments where staff have similar skills and expertise, and do similar jobs. • Functional grouping usually consists of marketing, finance, human resources and operations. • What other functional areas might there be?

  6. Functional grouping

  7. Functional grouping Advantages • Allow specialisation • Clear organisational structure • Staff aware of formal relationships Disadvantages • Organisation may become too large and wieldy • May be unresponsive to change • Departments may compete against each other

  8. Product/service grouping • Divisions/departments where each deals with a different product or product range. • eg Sky has Sky Sports, Sky Movies, Sky Atlantic etc. Each division has its own functional staff. • Virgin and General Electric are other examples of product/service grouping.

  9. Hewlett Packard Imaging and Printing Group Personal Systems Group Enterprise Systems Group HP Services HP Financial Services Product/service grouping

  10. Product/service grouping Advantages • Each division self-contained • More responsive to customer changes in tastes/fashions • Easier to identify low sales in products Disadvantages • Duplication of effort • Divisions may be competing with each other

  11. Customer grouping • Customer groups are divisions dealing with different types of customers. • May have different divisions based on distribution, eg retail, online and international.

  12. Customer grouping

  13. Customer grouping Advantages • Each division has varying customer needs • Customer loyalty can build due to personal touch • Can respond quickly to customer needs or changes in taste Disadvantages • Expensive due to higher staff costs • Duplication of effort • When key staff leave, personal relationship is lost

  14. Place/territory grouping • Staff divided into divisions, each dealing with a geographic area, eg south, west, north, Scotland. • Examples: Nestle, water boards

  15. Hewlett Packard Americas Houston, Texas Europe, Middle East, Africa Geneva, Switzerland Asia Pacific Hong Kong Place/territory grouping

  16. Place/territory grouping Advantages • Can cater for different local, regional, national tastes • More responsive to customer needs Disadvantages • Duplication of effort

  17. Technology grouping • Manufacturing companies group their business activities according to technological or production processes. • Only suitable for large organisations with different products and production processes. • Ford (bodywork, glass, plastics, paints) is an example.

  18. Technology grouping Advantages • Increased specialisation • Teething problems or technological problems easy to identify • Economies of scale Disadvantages • Specialist training required • Higher salaries for skilled workforce • Capital intensive

  19. Line/staff grouping • Core activities – line • Support activities – staff • Core activities are essential to the business, eg teachers are essential or core in the education sector. • Janitors, office staff and canteen workers are involved in the support (staff) activities that are required for a school to function.

  20. Answer a question • Many organisations group their activities by function. Discuss other methods an organisation could use to group their activities. (8 marks) 2008 • 15 minutes

  21. Peer marking • You are going to swap answers. • Has your partner answered well? • Does the answer make sense? • Is it worth a mark?

  22. Solution • Product/service grouping is when each division will be grouped according to a product or product range, eg Sky Sports, Sky Movies, Sky Atlantic. • Allows an organisation to be more responsive to changes in that market. • Expertise is developed within each specialised division. • Allows management to identify poorly performing products. • There can be duplication of resources and personnel across groups. • Divisions may find themselves competing against each other.

  23. Solution (cont’d) • Place/territory grouping is when grouping of resources is carried out across a geographical area, eg midlands, Scottish, south-east etc. • Allows for the needs of different areas. • Can become familiar with local customs and cultures. • Expensive with regards to administration and staffing costs.

  24. Solution (cont’d) • Technological grouping is when organisations group their activities according to technological process. • Suitable for large organisations with different production processes. • Duplication of resources can occur. • Customer grouping is when resources are organised around groups of customers with similar needs. • Allows for services to be tailored to each group of customers or a specific customer. • Builds up customer loyalty due to the personal service they receive. • There can be large staffing costs with this type of grouping. • Duplication of resources in administration, finance, etc.

  25. Organisation pyramid Board of directors Chief executive Senior managers Managers Junior managers Supervisors Assistants

  26. Span of control • Span of control means the number of people who report to a manager. Manager Manager Employees Employees Narrow span of control Wide span of control

  27. Hierarchical structures Hierarchical structures can be either tall or flat. Tall Flat

  28. Tall structures • Many levels of management • Managers have narrow span of control • Management posts usually specialised • Clearly defined roles

  29. Cost/benefit analysis of tall structures Benefits • Easier for managers to supervise staff • More promotion opportunities • Employees will know immediate boss • Clear lines of responsibility and communication Costs • Many layers of communication • Slow decision-making • High labour costs due to many levels of management • Workers may have little freedom or responsibility

  30. Flat structures • Few levels of management • Managers have wider spans of control • Faster communications • Quicker decision-making

  31. Cost/benefit analysis of flat structures Benefits • Employees have more authority and responsibility • Better communication between managers and workforce • Decision-making is quicker • Communication channels less complicated • Better team spirit Costs • Employees have greater workload • Employees may need training for many tasks • Fewer promotion opportunities • If span of control is too wide people may feel isolated or ignored

  32. Marketing worker Project manager Matrix structure • A project team created to carry out a specific task. • Team members come from different functional areas, and report to the project manager and their own functional manager. • Software development follows matrix structures Marketing manager Finance manager Finance worker

  33. Matrix structures Advantages • Increased experience • Good motivation and job satisfaction • Good for tackling complex problems Disadvantages • Expensive to have many teams • Co-ordination problems • Confusion as to who reports to whom Lack of supervision and confusion is thought to have led to the demise of Barings Bank.

  34. Entrepreneurial structure • Small businesses use this structure • Decisions made by a few people, normally the owner

  35. Entrepreneurial structure Advantages • Decisions made quickly • Staff know who they are accountable to • Decision-maker does not need to consult staff Disadvantages • Difficult to use in large businesses • Can create a heavy workload for decision-makers • Can stifle other staff’s initiatives

  36. HQ Centralisation • Control and decision-making lie with top management in head office (HQ)

  37. Centralisation Advantages • Decisions can be made for whole organisation • Easier to promote corporate image Disadvantages • Slower decision-making • Slower communication • Less room for staff initiative

  38. HQ Decentralisation • Control and decision-making are delegated to departments • Relieves senior management from routine, day-to-day tasks

  39. Decentralisation Advantages • Motivates staff • Empowers staff • Decision-making quicker • Decisions can match local needs Disadvantages • Decisions may differ from other branches • Transfer of staff may lead to confusion due to different practices • Less supervision

  40. Answer a question a) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the entrepreneurial structure. (4 marks) 2008 b) Describe the main features of the matrix structure. (3 marks) 2010 • 12 minutes

  41. Self-marking • You are going answer on your own! • Have you answered well? • Does the answer make sense? • Is it worth a mark?

  42. Solution to a) Advantages • Decisions are made quickly as managers do not consult staff, who rely on their expertise. • Staff know who they are accountable to as they have only one superior. Disadvantages • Difficult to use in larger businesses as they have more complex operations. • Top managers carry a heavy workload/burden as they have to make all the key decisions. • Does not allow for initiative from staff, which can demotivate talented employees.

  43. Solution to b) • Matrix structures are created for specific projects. • They are made up of specialists from different functional areas, and offer a good mix of skills and ideas. • They are a a good method of solving complex problems, having different abilities and disciplines involved. • Each staff member can have two managers: the project manager and their own functional manager. This can cause confusion and conflict as staff are unsure of their priorities. • Gives staff increased experience in different situations, which improves their skills and potential for promotion (career progression).

  44. Factors affecting organisation structure • Size of organisation • Technology used • Market firm operates in • Staff skills within organisation • Products/services made or supplied by organisation Click for clip

  45. Definitions • Line relationships – exist when a member of staff is in charge of another member of staff. • Functional relationships - exist with people on the same level of management. • Staff relationships – exist with people who have skills that support the firm as a whole rather than individual departments. • Informal relationships – exist as friendships between workers who may have no formal contact in the workplace.

  46. Delayering What happens? • Levels of management are reduced (move from tall to flat structure) • Wider spans of control • Savings in management wages Effect on organisation chart • Flatter structure • Fewer management posts • Increased worker responsibilities

  47. Downsizing What happens? • Staff laid-off • Wages (labour costs) are reduced Effect on organisation chart • Greater workload for departments • Some posts will disappear • Workers have more duties

  48. Answer a question • Distinguish between delayering and downsizing. (3 marks) 2008 • 6 minutes

  49. Peer marking • You are going to swap answers. • Has your partner answered well? • Does the answer make sense? • Is it worth a mark?

  50. Solution • Delayering involves removing a whole level of management to flatten an organisation’s structure. • Downsizing involves closing specific areas of the organisation to cut costs. • Communication – Delayering will quicken communication between management levels. Downsizing may not, as it closes certain departments and does not affect management structures. • Efficiency – Delayering may be viewed as more efficient by removing levels of management, but downsizing may affect productivity and efficiency as staff are not replaced. • Cost – Delayering reduces costs through fewer promotions, saving on salaries, whereas downsizing saves costs by making employees redundant.

More Related