1 / 27

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Textiles

Department of Homeland Security  Customs and Border Protection. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Textiles. July 2006. Department of Homeland Security  Customs and Border Protection. The Textile Import Industry. Total Imports = $ 1.9 Trillion

ryan-bell
Download Presentation

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Textiles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Department of Homeland Security  Customs and Border Protection U.S. Customs and Border ProtectionTextiles July 2006

  2. Department of Homeland Security  Customs and Border Protection The Textile Import Industry Total Imports = $ 1.9 Trillion Textile Products = 43% of all Duties Collected Total Duties = $25 Billion Average Duty Rate 16% *K = Thousand M = Million B = Billion 2

  3. Columbus Trade

  4. Columbus Trade

  5. Columbus Trade

  6. Textile Supplier Countries Volume • China • Mexico • Pakistan • Canada • India • Korea • Indonesia • Bangladesh • Honduras • Taiwan Value • China • Mexico • India • Hong Kong • Indonesia • Pakistan • Canada • Vietnam • Honduras • Bangladesh

  7. January 1, 2005 and Beyond • Quota Eliminated for all WTO Member Nations EXCEPT China • Safeguard Mechanism Replaced by Comprehensive Quota Agreement • Textile Bilaterals Expired • Authority to Conduct TPVTs Expire • MOUs (HK and Macao) • Enforcement Focus Unchanging

  8. January 1, 2005 and Beyond • Changes to the Regulations • Elimination of the Paper Textile Declaration • Allows Electronic Filing of Entries; • Changes to the Construction of the Manufacturer Identification Code • The Entity that Performed the Origin Conferring Process • Not the Trading House, the Shipper, etc. • Remote Location Filing • Working on the Informal Value Limits/Not Revenue Neutral

  9. Textile Enforcement Focus • Textiles and Wearing Apparel Designated As a Priority Trade Issue for FY 06 • Enforcement Focus • Origin Fraud; Illegal Transshipment; Quota Circumvention; Inadmissibility of Merchandise • Enforcement of Various Legislative Trade Initiatives and Free Trade Agreement Preference Claims • Protection of the Revenue • 5 Year Enforcement Strategy to Congress

  10. Textile Enforcement Focus • Risks • FTA and other Trade Legislation • $22.4 Billion in Trade Preference Claims out of a Universe of $100.3 Billion in Imports • China Quota • Illegal Transshipment • Misdescription of Merchandise • Smuggling; Unmanifested Goods • General Misdescription to Avoid Duties and Quota • 43% of Duties Collected Involve Textile Goods

  11. Textile Enforcement Focus • FTA Activity • Morocco Implemented on January 1, 2006 • CAFTA El Salvador Implemented on February 1; Nicaragua and Honduras April 1, 2006; Guatemala, July 1, 2006 • Thailand, ANDEAN Countries, Panama, UAE and SACU in Negotiation • Bahrain and Oman Completed • South Korea and Malaysia Negotiations Started

  12. Enforcement Issues • Free Trade Agreement Enforcement • 2,164 Lines Valued at $66.4M Reviewed • 563 or 28% Found to Be Non-Compliant • $1.2 M in Additional Revenue Recovered • NAFTA Accounted for 79% of Revenues Recovered; CBTPA Accounted for 13% • Preference Claims Value $22.4 B in 2005

  13. Training • Free Trade Agreement Training Initiative • New York, Miami, Los Angeles and Atlanta • 90% of Import Specialists Processing Textile FTA Goods Have Been Trained this Calendar Year • Extensive Training Materials Have Been Prepared

  14. Textile Enforcement Focus • Chinese Quotas • U.S. Government Has Negotiated a Comprehensive Agreement which Became Effective on January 1, 2006; Expires December 31, 2008 • U.S. and China Resurrected ELVIS Links • China Issues a Paper Visa and a Certificate of Origin • Will Only Be Provided to CBP Upon Making the Request to the Importer

  15. Textile Production Verification Teams • Since October 2005 TPVTS Were Conducted in: • Hong Kong • Macao • Swaziland • Vietnam • Egypt • Mauritius • South Africa • Thailand • Kenya

  16. Textile Production Verification Teams • November 2005 Visit to Hong Kong • 167 Factories Targeted • 65 Closed • 24 Refused Admission • 46 High-Risk Designation • 3 Evidence of Transshipment • December 2005 Visit to Macao • 28 Factories Targeted • 5 Closed • 3 High-Risk Designation

  17. Textile Production Verification Teams • Seizure of Goods from Closed Factories • $2.6 Million to Date • Production Records Being Requested on Previous Shipments Involving $38.3 Million in Value • Penalties Being Pursued • Since October 2005 More than $42 Million Seized

  18. Textile Enforcement • Audit of Textile Importers FY 2005 • 42 Audits Completed • 34 Had Positive Enforcement Findings • $4.97 Million in Additional Revenues Collected • Classification Errors $928,831 • Singapore FTA Findings $43,265 • Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act $510,944

  19. Common Broker Errors • Incorrect ISO Codes • Incorrect Construction of the Manufacturer Identification Code (MID) • Incorrect Country of Origin • Bras • Incorrect Entry Types • 01s Instead of 02s

  20. Common Broker Errors • Just Because a Product Was Exported from an FTA or Trade Preference Country Doesn’t Make It Eligible for Duty-Free Treatment • Don’t Rely Solely on the Bill of Lading/Review All Documents Presented For Entry • Learn to Read

  21. Enforcement Issues • A Search of Chapters 50-63, for Jan 2004 - July 2005 Revealed $84 Million in Imports. • $18.5 Million, or 22% of that Value Reveals a Mismatch between Country of Origin and Country of Export or MID Origin. • Over $1 Million Shows Obvious Admissibility Issues.

  22. Enforcement Issues • Filing of Incorrect Entries • 02 Quota/Paper Entries Continue to Be Required for the Following: • AGOA Preference • Tariff Preference Level Claims in NAFTA, CAFTA, Chile, Singapore and Morocco FTAs • China Comprehensive Quota Agreement • CBTPA & ATPDEA Claims under the Cap • Non-WTO Country Imports e.g. Vietnam • Worsted Wool (Chapter 99)

  23. Textile Enforcement • Operation “X” • 5 Days over a 5 Week Period (Nov-Dec. 2005) • 2,121 Additional Examinations of Goods Claiming Country of Origin China; Focus on Misdescription • 131 Violations Found • 63 Incorrect Country of Origin Declared • 23 Incorrect Information on Manifest • 22 Incorrect Classification of Goods • 4 Intellectual Property Rights Violations • 4 Health and Safety Violations • 3 Incorrect Quantities Declared • 1 Smuggling, etc. • Violations Totaled $2.5 Million in Value • 5 Seizures Totaling $88,441 • 7 Penalties Being Pursued

  24. Enforcement Issues • Misdescription/Misclassification of Imported Products • Ramie vs. Cotton and Manmade Fiber Products • Circumvents Chinese Quota Restraints • Ramie 0-2% Duty Rate • Cotton 16% Duty Rate • Manmade 32% Duty Rate • Loss in Duties Exceeds $12 Million • 68 Bogus Companies in the Mix to Defraud the Government and Evade Quotas

  25. Detentions • Policy Is Not Set In Stone • Each Transaction Stands on Its Own • Generally: • 4 Compliant Reviews and the Manufacturer is Removed from Scrutiny • Manufacturer May Have Problems with One Importer and Not Another; Compliant Importer May Be Removed From Further Scrutiny • Information from other Sources e.g. Foreign Government May Cause Removal of Manufacturer Immediately from Further Scrutiny

  26. CAFTA Implementation Issues • USTR Announced El Salvador Receiving CAFTA Retroactive Benefits on March 6, 2006 Ref. 71 FR 11235; Honduras and Nicaragua Added in April • CBP Publishes Interim Regulation on March 7, 2006 Ref 71 FR 11304 • Required Documents • Pursuant to the Legislation • CBP Can Locate the Entry or the Entry Can Be Reconstructed; • Satisfies the Conditions of Preferential Treatment Under CAFTA

  27. CAFTA Implementation Issues • Time Limits • By December 31, 2006 , or 90 Days after the Date of Entry into Force for that Country; • Being Changed to “90 Days after Last Country Enters into Force”.

More Related