1 / 48

SCHOOL CRISIS PREVENTION & INTERVENTION: SUICIDE

SCHOOL CRISIS PREVENTION & INTERVENTION: SUICIDE. David N. Miller University at Albany, S.U.N.Y. Richard Lieberman Los Angeles Unified School District Co-Chairs, NASP School Crisis Prevention & Intervention Workgroup - Suicide.

ryo
Download Presentation

SCHOOL CRISIS PREVENTION & INTERVENTION: SUICIDE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SCHOOL CRISIS PREVENTION & INTERVENTION: SUICIDE David N. Miller University at Albany, S.U.N.Y. Richard Lieberman Los Angeles Unified School District Co-Chairs, NASP School Crisis Prevention & Intervention Workgroup - Suicide

  2. The NASP School Crisis Prevention & Intervention Workgroup: Suicide • Connie Adams • Dixon Bryson • Wendy Carria • Ivan Croft • Elliott Davis • Kenneth Greff • Alan Hilden • Jennifer Kitson • Jack Martin • Scott Poland • Susan Ruof

  3. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Youth: An Overview • Suicidal behavior includes suicidal ideation (thoughts), attempts, and completions • Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the U.S. • Suicide rate among children and youth has increased over 300% since the 1950s • A child or adolescent commits suicide in the U.S. approximately every 2 hours • Suicide rates highest among high school students, although there have been recent increases among middle school students

  4. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Youth: An Overview • More children and adolescents die annually from suicide than from cancer, heart disease, AIDS, birth defects, and other medical conditions combined • Research suggests approximately 20% of high school students experience serious suicidal thoughts in a given year, and that about 4-8% make actual attempts • Over 2000 children and adolescents commit suicide annually • These statistics likely underestimate actual figures, although the degree to which this occurs is uncertain

  5. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: An Overview • In any given year in a typical high school class of 30 students: • 6 will seriously consider suicide • 2 to 3 will attempt suicide • 1 will make an attempt sufficiently harmful to require medical attention

  6. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Demographics • Gender • Adolescent females attempt suicide at a rate of 2:1/ 3:1 compared to adolescent males • Adolescent males commit suicide at a rate of nearly 5:1 compared to adolescent females • Age • Rates of suicidal behavior increase as children get older, hitting peak in early 20s

  7. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Demographics • Race • White males currently at highest risk • Other high risk groups: Native-American youth; African-American males • Limited data available on other groups • Geography • Highest suicide rates in Western states and Alaska • Lowest suicide rates in Northeastern states • Higher suicide rates in rural than in urban areas

  8. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Demographics • When: • Slightly more suicides occur during Spring • Month with least amount of suicides: December • Suicide rates lower just before and during holidays • Where: • Most adolescent suicides occur at home, where primary means for suicide (typically firearms) are available

  9. Suicidal Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Demographics • How: • Firearms are most popular method among both males and females who commit suicide in U.S. • Worldwide, hanging is the most frequently used method of youth suicide, and the second most popular method among U.S youth. • Risk of suicidal behavior a function of intent and lethality; students with high level of intent who use methods of high lethality (e.g., firearms) present greatest risk

  10. Suicide Ideation, Attempts, and Completion • Three different types of suicidal behaviors (ideators, attempters, and completers) reflect different types of individuals • Typical youth suicide attempter: Adolescent female who ingests pills in front of her family during an argument • Typical youth suicide completer: Adolescent male who is a victim of a gunshot wound

  11. Common Myths About Youth Suicide • Students who talk about suicide are just looking for attention • Listening to certain types of music (e.g., “heavy metal”) or engaging in certain activities (e.g., watching particular movies) causes people to become suicidal • Preventing access to lethal means will not prevent suicide - students will simply choose another method • Most dangerous myth: Talking about suicide will encourage suicidal behavior in students

  12. Suicidal Behavior and Schools:Legal Issues • School districts have been found liable for not offering suicide prevention programs, for providing inadequate supervision of at-risk students, and for failing to notify parents when their children were suicidal • Liability issues are forseeability and negligence • Schools not responsible ultimately, but must demonstrate they made appropriate, “good faith” efforts to prevent suicide from occurring

  13. Child/Adolescent Risk Factors in Youth Suicide • Previous suicide attempt • Current suicidal ideation, intent, and plan • Psychiatric Disorders and Problems • Depression • Hopelessness • Conduct problems • Drug and/or alcohol abuse • Impulse control problems (e.g., shoplifting; gambling; eating disorders; self-injury)

  14. Child/Adolescent Risk Factors in Youth Suicide • Gay or lesbian sexual orientation • Unwillingness to seek help because of perceived stigma • Feelings of isolation or being cut off from others • Ineffective coping mechanisms • Inadequate problem-solving skills • Cultural and/or religious beliefs (e.g., belief that suicide is a noble or acceptable solution to a personal dilemma)

  15. Environmental/Situational/Family Risk Factors in Youth Suicide • Access to lethal methods, especially firearms • Exposure to suicide and/or family history of suicide • Loss (e.g., death; divorce; relationships) • Victimization/exposure to violence (e.g., bullying) • School crisis (e.g., disciplinary; academic) • Family crisis (e.g., abuse; domestic violence; running away; child-parental conflict) • Influence (either through personal contact or media representations) of significant people who died by suicide • Barriers to accessing mental health treatment

  16. Environmental/Situational/Family Risk Factors in Youth Suicide • Experiences of disappointment or rejection • Feelings of stress brought about by perceived achievement needs • Unwanted pregnancy; abortion • Infection with HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases • Serious injury that may change the individual’s life course (e.g., Traumatic Brain Injury) • Severe or terminal physical illness • Death of a loved one • Separation from family or friends

  17. Suicide Clusters • Defined as more suicides or suicide attempts than expected, close together in time and location • Teens most susceptible to contagion • Appears to represent 1-5% of all suicides • Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that 100-200 teens die in clusters annually • Media reporting may contribute to clusters

  18. Youth Suicide Clusters:Community Characteristics • Lack of integration and belonging • Rapid community growth and large schools • High rates of substance abuse • Emphasis on material possession • Lack of mental health services and little awareness of problem of youth suicide • No 24-hour crisis hotlines • Lack of networking and coordination among community agencies

  19. Warning Signs for Youth Suicide • Suicide threats • Suicide plan/method/access • Making final arrangements • Sudden changes in behavior, friends, or personality • Changes in physical habits and appearance • Preoccupation with death and suicide themes • Increased inability to concentrate or think clearly • Loss of interest in previously pleasurable activities • Symptoms of depression • Increased use and abuse of alcohol and/or drugs

  20. Suicide Risk Assessment: Issues to Cover • What warning sign(s) initiated the referral? • Has the youth thought about suicide? • Has the youth tried to hurt himself/herself previously? • Does the youth have a plan to harm himself/herself now? • Has the youth told anyone about the suicidal plan, and what is the possibility of rescue?

  21. Suicide Risk Assessment:Issues to Cover • Has the youth imagined the reaction of others to his/her death? • Has the youth made any final arrangements? • What method is the youth planning to use, and does he/she have access to the means? • What is the youth’s support system (e.g. parents, caregivers, other adults, friends, etc.) • What does the youth perceive as deterrents to suicide?

  22. Suicide Risk Assessment: Interviewing Children and Youth • Calmly gather information • Be direct and unambiguous in asking questions • Assess lethality of method and identify a course of action • Use effective listening skills by reflecting feelings, remaining non-judgmental, and not minimizing the problem • Communicate caring, support, and trust while providing encouragement for coping strategies • Be hopeful; emphasize student’s worth • Determine if student has a thorough understanding of the finality of death

  23. Suicide Risk Assessment:Interviewing Children and Youth • Gather information about youth’s and family’s history, with emphasis on suicide and substance abuse • Emphasize alternatives to suicide • Don’t make any “deals” to keep suicidal thoughts or actions a secret • Do not leave high-risk youth alone • Get supportive collaboration from colleagues • Be familiar with community resources • Outline the steps that will be taken to help the student • Keep detailed notes of procedures

  24. “No-Suicide” or “Safety” Contracts • Widely used and recommended, but there is increasing controversy regarding their use • In reality, they are neither contractual nor ensure genuine safety • They tend to emphasize what students won’t do rather than what they will do • May be viewed by students as coercive, since failure to sign may force hospitalization • May give school psychologists a false sense of security • Better approach: Encourage students to commit to treatment rather than merely promising “safety”

  25. Suicide Risk Assessment:Questions for Teachers • Have you noticed any major changes in your student’s schoolwork recently? • Have you noticed any behavioral, emotional, or attitudinal changes? • Has the student experienced any trouble in school? What kind of trouble? • Does the student appear depressed and/or hostile and angry? If so, what clues does the student give? • Has the student either verbally, behaviorally, or symbolically (in an essay or story) threatened suicide or expressed statements associated with self-destruction or death?

  26. Suicide Risk Assessment:Questions for Parents/Caregivers • Has any serious change occurred in your child’s or family’s life recently? • (If yes) How did your child respond? • Has your child had any accidents or illnesses without a recognizable physical basis? • Has your child experienced a loss lately? • Has your child experienced difficulty in any areas of his/her life? • Has your child been very self-critical, or does he/she seem to think that you or teachers have been very critical lately?

  27. Suicide Risk Assessment:Questions for Parents/Caregivers • Has your child made any unusual statements to you or others about death or dying? Any unusual questions or jokes about death or dying? • Have there been any changes you’ve noticed in your child’s mood or behavior over the last few months? • Has your child ever threatened or attempted suicide before, or attempted to harm himself/herself? • Have any of your child’s friends or family, including yourselves, ever threatened or attempted suicide? • How have these last few months been for you? How have you reacted to your child (e.g., with anger, despair, empathy)?

  28. Special Issues in Suicide Risk Assessment: Self-Injury • Self-injury (also known as self-mutilation) involves the intentional self-destruction of body tissue without deliberate suicidal intent • Most typical form of self-injury is cutting • Self-injury appears to provide rapid but temporary relief from stress and tension, a sense of security or control, and/or decreases in distressing thoughts or feelings • Although youth who engage in self-injury are at increased risk for suicidal behavior, self-injury and suicide are two different types of problems and are not synonymous

  29. Special Issues in Suicide Risk Assessment: Self-Injury • Making accurate distinction between suicidal behavior and self-injury is critical, because despite some similarities in appearance they serve different functions • An individual attempting suicide is trying to end his/her life, whereas the individual engaging in self-injury is typically trying to maintain it • In contrast to suicide completion, self-injury appears to be more prevalent in girls than boys • Self-injury typically begins in early adolescence and may persist for years if not adequately treated • The number of children and youth engaging in self-injury is likely underestimated and increasing

  30. Suicide Risk Assessment:Selected Self-Report Scales • Adolescent Psychopathology Scale (APS) • Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI) • Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI) • Reynolds’ Adolescent Depression Scale, 2nd Edition (RADS-2) • Reynolds’ Child Depression Scale (RCDS) • Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ) • Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire, Junior (SIQ-JR)

  31. Predicting Probability of Suicidal Behavior • As with predicting probability of students engaging in school violence, this is difficult to do with a high degree of accuracy • As a “low base-rate” event, reliable and valid prediction of suicide at a precise or potential future time is virtually impossible • An added difficulty in accurate prediction is that suicidal behaviors are often temporally and situationally specific

  32. Immediate Interventions for Suicidal Students • Assess severity of suicidal risk • Remove access to methods • Notify parents/caregivers and others as needed • Supervise student at all times • “Suicide-proof” the environment • Seek support and collaboration from colleagues • Mobilize a support team for student • Document all actions

  33. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs • Curriculum programs for students • In-service training for school personnel • Student self-report screening procedures

  34. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: Curriculum Programs • Currently most investigated form of school-based suicide prevention • Goals of programs typically include: • Increasing student awareness • Training students to recognize warning signs • Providing students with available school and community resources

  35. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: Curriculum Programs • Pros: • May change student knowledge and attitudes • May lead students to alert adults about peers • Potentially useful component of comprehensive suicide prevention program • Cons: • Many erroneously subscribed to “stress” model • Typically don’t examine effects on behavior • Criticized as inefficient • Suicidal youth often have limited peer networks

  36. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: In-Service Training • Widely used model in schools • Typically includes following: • Discussion of warning signs • Discussion of sample cases • Referral procedures

  37. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: In-Service Training • Pros: • Can lead to increased awareness among staff • May involve less risk and be less intrusive than other approaches • Found to produce positive effects on staff knowledge, attitudes, and referral practices • Cons: • Assumes staff can and will correctly identify suicidal students • Lacks efficiency and is a passive approach • One-shot in-service training often ineffective

  38. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: Student Screening • Many researchers contend that direct assessment of students is an essential component of effective prevention • Reynolds’ 2-stage model: • 1. Initial self-report screening • 2. Follow-up individual interviews for those identified as at-risk

  39. School-Based Suicide Prevention Programs: Student Screening • Pros: • Initial research promising • Uses more direct approach • Reliable and valid screening instruments available • Cons: • Will often over-identify students • More labor intensive than other procedures • May be less acceptable than other methods • Issue of timing of screening – When? How often?

  40. School-Based Screening Programs • Teen Screen • www.teenscreen.org • Signs of Suicide (SOS) • www.mentalhealthscreening.org • (781) 239-0071 • Both have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying suicidal youth

  41. Screening Programs:Signs of Suicide (SOS) • Two key components: educational video and questionnaire • Video is designed to teach teens warning signs of depression and suicide and the importance of getting help • Questionnaire designed to screen teens, with both subtle and direct questions about depression and suicide • Potentially at-risk teens flagged for further assessment and intervention as needed • Designated as an effective program by SAMHSA and has many sponsors, including NASP • Implemented in over 1500 schools nationwide

  42. School-Based Suicide Prevention:Some Conclusions • A combination of primary and secondary prevention programs is recommended • Programs may be most effective when they involve multiple levels of influence and address multiple risk factors • Need to shift focus from prevention of separate disorders/problems to emphasis on healthy living and competency-based models

  43. Suicide Postvention • Schools frequently not prepared for suicide, yet few events have greater impact on students, parents, and staff • Primary goal of postvention is to prevent further suicidal behavior and possible contagion effects

  44. Suicide Postvention:Recommended “Dos” and “Don’ts” • Do plan in advance of any crisis • Do select and train a crisis team • Do verify that a suicide occurred • Do disseminate information to faculty, students, and parents; be truthful but avoid unnecessary detail • Do report information to students in small groups (classrooms) using fact sheets and uniform statements • Do not release information about the suicide in a mass assembly or over a loud speaker • Do have extra counselors available on site for students and staff

  45. Suicide Postvention:Recommended “Dos” and “Don’ts” • Do not dismiss school or stop classes • Do not dedicate a memorial, fly flag at half-mast, or have a moment of silence for diseased; develop living memorials instead (e.g., student assistance programs) • Do allow students, with parental permission, to attend the funeral • Do not make special arrangements to send all students from a class or school to the funeral • Do contact the family and offer any assistance • Do collaborate with media, law enforcement, and community agencies

  46. Suicide Postvention:Media Guidelines • Do not sensationalize with front page coverage and/or details of suicide method • Do not print pictures of deceased • Do not report the suicide as simplistic or romantic • Do emphasize that no one person or thing is to blame • Do provide information on suicide prevention • Do provide information about where students can go for help, including both school and community resources • Do emphasize that suicide is a preventable problem, and that we all have a role in it

  47. References • Berman, A.L., Jobes, D.A., & Silverman, M.M. (2006). Adolescent suicide: Assessment and intervention, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: APA. • Brock, S.E. (2002). School suicide postvention. In S.E. Brock, P.J. Lazarus, and S.R. Jimerson (Eds.), Best practices in school crisis prevention and intervention (pp. 553-576). Bethesda, MD: NASP • Kalafat, J., & Lazarus, P.J. (2002). Suicide prevention in schools. In S.E. Brock, P.J. Lazarus, & S.R. Jimerson (Eds.), Best practices in school crisis prevention and intervention (pp. 211-223). Bethesda, MD: NASP. • Lieberman, R., & Davis, J. (2002). Suicide intervention. In S.E. Brock, P.J. Lazarus, & S.R. Jimerson (Eds.), Best practices in school crisis prevention and intervention (pp. 531-551). Bethesda, MD: NASP. • Lieberman, R., & Poland, S. (2006). Self-mutilation. In G. Bear & K. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III. (pp. 965-975). Bethesda, MD: NASP. • Miller, D.N., & McConaughy, S.H. (2005). Assessing risk for suicide. In S.H. McConaughy Clinical interviews for children and adolescents (pp. 184-199). New York: Guilford.

  48. Web-Based Resources • National Association of School Psychologists • www.nasponline.org • American Association of Suicidology • www.suicidology.org • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention • www.afsp.org • Centers for Disease Control • www.cdc.gov

More Related