1 / 13

Governance, Coherence, and WTO Dispute Settlement

Governance, Coherence, and WTO Dispute Settlement. Joel P. Trachtman The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Agenda. Role of Dispute Settlement in International Law Generally—Dispute Settlement as Governance Role of Dispute Settlement at the WTO Diagnose Incoherence Diagnose Imbalance

sabina
Download Presentation

Governance, Coherence, and WTO Dispute Settlement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Governance, Coherence, and WTO Dispute Settlement Joel P. Trachtman The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy

  2. Agenda • Role of Dispute Settlement in International Law Generally—Dispute Settlement as Governance • Role of Dispute Settlement at the WTO • Diagnose Incoherence • Diagnose Imbalance • Achieving Coherence and Balance • A Tale of Heroism

  3. The Role of Dispute Settlement in International Law • Role of international law: • Allow states to cooperate—to overcome bargaining problems and transaction costs problems in market for authority in international relations • Role of dispute settlement in enhancing utility of international law • Incomplete Contracts • Enforcement

  4. Incomplete Contracts • All treaties are incomplete • Under regime of auto-interpretation, they fail to resolve all disputes • Under regime of dispute settlement, all disputes are resolved by definitive interpretation • Optimal completeness and “rules versus standards” • Costs of specification, including political costs • Constructive ambiguity? Governance “gap” and heroic response

  5. Enforcement • Informal: third party declaration of who is right • Law merchant (Milgrom, North, and Weingast) • Solving information problem in multilateral setting • Facilitating multilateral punishment of violation • Formal • No police force • Authorizes self-help • Restrains self-help

  6. The Role of Dispute Settlement in WTO Law • Mandate in terms of incomplete contracts: • To clarify (interpret) • Preserve rights and obligations • Provide security and predictability • Mandate in terms of enforcement: • Gatekeeper to authorized self-help • Penalties? • Remedies are insufficient—add on continuing informal sanctions

  7. Incoherence, Incompleteness, Imbalance, and Enforcement • Where does incoherence come from? • Normative incompleteness • Procedural incompleteness or imbalance in terms of the institutional backing for different norms: variable institutionalization • Institutional imbalance within the WTO

  8. Normative Incompleteness • Failure of treaty negotiators to specify how different international law norms relate to one another • National bureaucratic incoherence • Unwillingness to bear political costs of determining hierarchy of values • Superiority of case-based determination? • Failure of Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties to provide a normatively satisfactory or predictable response to treaty conflict

  9. Procedural Incompleteness • Only selected norms have mandatory dispute settlement • Only selected norms have potential remedies • Dispute settlement bodies have specialized mandates • Result: variable enforcement and variable compliance

  10. Imbalance • Strengthened dispute settlement in 1994 • Increasingly difficult treaty-making • Leaves excessive responsibility to dispute settlement

  11. Are Normative Incompleteness and Procedural Incompleteness Bad? • WTO Dispute Settlement has limited mandate to resolve normative incompleteness (reducing concerns regarding procedural incompleteness) • WTO Dispute Settlement makes tough decisions that treaty negotiators failed to make • WTO Dispute Settlement bears the criticism that treaty negotiators avoid

  12. Resolving Incoherence, Incompleteness and Imbalance • Protect WTO Dispute Settlement from criticism by avoiding excessive responsibility • Where WTO Dispute Settlement mandate is inadequate to resolve normative incompleteness, then diplomats must complete the contract ex post • Diplomats can also resolve normative conflicts ex ante, but this is not always possible or desirable

  13. Conclusion • Muddling through and constitutional moments in international governance • Normative incompleteness • Procedural incompleteness • Imbalance • The heroism of the Appellate Body

More Related