1 / 39

Creating Citable Data Identifiers

Creating Citable Data Identifiers. Ryan Scherle Mark Diggory. Mimosa house 807 South Virginia Dare Trail Kill Devil Hills, NC USA 27948. 1903-12- 17 36.019705 N, 75.668769 W. 79330-S84-A41 WP0ZZZ99ZTS392124. Loxosceles reclusa. Citing identifiers. Mimosa house

sahara
Download Presentation

Creating Citable Data Identifiers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating Citable Data Identifiers Ryan Scherle Mark Diggory

  2. Mimosa house • 807 South Virginia Dare Trail • Kill Devil Hills, NC USA • 27948

  3. 1903-12-17 • 36.019705 N, 75.668769 W

  4. 79330-S84-A41 • WP0ZZZ99ZTS392124

  5. Loxoscelesreclusa

  6. Citing identifiers • Mimosa house • 807 South Virginia Dare Trail • 1903-12-17 • 27948 • Loxoscelesreclusa • 36.019705 N, 75.668769 W • 79330-S84-A41 • WP0ZZZ99ZTS392124

  7. Identifiers matter • Some identifiers are machine-friendly, some are human-friendly • For citations, you need to strike a balance • Good identifiers are a critical selling point for an repository

  8. http://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/lilly/slocum/LL-SLO-009276

  9. Principles ofcitable identifiers

  10. 1. Use DOIs • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab • Scientists are familiar with DOIs

  11. 1. Use DOIs • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab • Scientists are familiar with DOIs • DOIs are supported by many tools and services

  12. 1. Use DOIs • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab • Scientists are familiar with DOIs • DOIs are supported by many tools and services Current support:

  13. 2. Keep identifiers simple • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab • Complex identifiers are fine for machines, but they’re bad for humans. • Despite best intentions, humans sometimes need to work with identifiers manually. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743131X11Y.0000000009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-220851-5.00003-4

  14. 2. Keep identifiers simple • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab • Complex identifiers are fine for machines, but they’re bad for humans. • Despite best intentions, humans sometimes need to work with identifiers manually. Current support:

  15. 3. Use syntax to illustrate relationships • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab/3 • Adding a tiny bit of semantics to an identifier is incredibly useful http://files.eprints.org/691/ http://files.eprints.org/447/ http://files.eprints.org/556/ • Useful for various human “hacks” • Useful for statistics

  16. 3. Use syntax to illustrate relationships • http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab/3 • Adding a tiny bit of semantics to an identifier is incredibly useful Current support:

  17. 4. When “meaning-bearing” content changes, create a versioned identifier • Scientists want data to be invariant to enable reuse by machines • Even a single bit makes a difference • Watch out for implicit abstractions…http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.123ab/thumbnail • What about DOI conventions?

  18. 5. When “meaningless” content changes, retain the current identifier • Descriptive metadata must be editable without creating a new identifier. • Humans rarely care about metadata changes, especially for citation purposes! • Caveat: machine-oriented systems may consider the “metadata” to be data, which requires identifier changes

  19. Current versioning support

  20. Principles of citable identifiers 1. Use DOIs 2. Keep identifiers simple 3. Use syntax to illustrate relationships 4. When “meaning-bearing” content changes, create a versioned identifier 5. When “meaningless” content changes, retain the current identifier

  21. Hacking DSpace to support… • DOI identifier registration • Semantics in identifiers • Citation publication • Versioning

  22. DSpace identifier services • Handle system independence • More future identifier systems will come. • Granular control • Separate reservation from registration • Citation • Registration of metadata with external services

  23. DSpace identifier services

  24. DataCite content service

  25. Promoting accurate citations Added suggested citation formats up front

  26. Versioning • Versioning is item “editioning” • Creation of new versions is a “user mediated” process (submitter or reviewer) • Versioning does not alter the original item • Version relationships are maintained independent of the item’s metadata

  27. Submission-based revisions

  28. Result: Citable data versions doi:10.5061/dryad.bb7m4

  29. Future technical directions • Add metadata versioning under the hood -- may need to rethink some of the current system • Integrate our changes to core DSpace • Moving these features into the core requires further discussion with the Dspace user community

  30. How are we doing? For 186 articles associated with Dryad deposits: • 77% had “good” citations to the data • 2% had “bad” citations to the data • 21% had no data citations Standards for data citation are still evolving.Journals have yet to agree on where to place data citations, and authors are just starting to become familiar with the concept.

  31. What should you do now? • Analyze how data is used and cited outside the repository • Determine whether use is more machine-oriented or more human-oriented • Design identifiers and identifier management to facilitate the observed uses

  32. Thanks! Ryan Scherle ryan@scherle.org Mark Diggory mdiggory@atmire.com

More Related