1 / 28

Health Insurance Exchanges: What Your States Need to Do

Health Insurance Exchanges: What Your States Need to Do. What You Need. Exchange for the individual market and a SHOP exchange One exchange or two? Exchanges will serve as Regulatory body Subsidy administrator Enrollment portal Informational portal

salvatore
Download Presentation

Health Insurance Exchanges: What Your States Need to Do

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health Insurance Exchanges:What Your States Need to Do

  2. What You Need • Exchange for the individual market and a SHOP exchange • One exchange or two? • Exchanges will serve as • Regulatory body • Subsidy administrator • Enrollment portal • Informational portal • Federal grants for establishing exchange will begin in March 2011 • HHS issuing more guidance on structure of exchanges through 2011 • Including what are essential benefits

  3. Exchange Timeline

  4. Developing the Website Portal • Secretary is required to operate and maintain an internet portal and assist states in developing and maintaining theirs • Directs qualified individuals and employers to… • Standardized information on qualified health plans • Eligibility determination • Premium tax credit or cost-sharing reductions eligibility • Still waiting on further guidance

  5. Website Examples: Massachusetts

  6. Website Examples: Massachusetts

  7. Website Examples: Utah

  8. Website Examples: Utah

  9. Website Examples: Wisconsin, prototype

  10. Website Examples: Wisconsin, prototype

  11. Governance Structure • Bricks and Mortar Approach • Establish new governance structure • Might duplicate existing state government functions • Utilize existing state regulatory authorities • Department of Insurance • State Medicaid/CHIP Offices • Non-Profit Entity • Most state exchanges will be governed by a Board representing stakeholders and policymakers.

  12. Financing: Start Up Grants • State Government financing • In July, HHS provided $50 million in grants to help states start the planning process • In January, HHS announced a second round of grants to help states to continue implementation • States will have multiple opportunities to apply for funding as they progress through Exchange establishment • Exchanges must be financially self-sustaining by 2015

  13. Financing: Ongoing Operations • State options to finance Exchanges after 2015: • Massachusetts imposes a 4 percent assessment on exchange participants • Utah assists only small groups offering defined contribution coverage, and does not impose a levy on enrollees • Additional Fees: • Exchange participants • All consumers • State Government Financing • Increase burden on state budgets • Expand the Individual Mandate penalty • Additional penalty state collects to finance exchange • States may explore assessments on carriers

  14. Pooling • PPACA requires insurers to pool all individual members in one risk pool and all small employer group members in another • Currently carriers keep the two pools entirely distinct • State exchange can determine if they want combined risk pools or separate • Individual market benefit from larger risk pool? • PPACA contains mechanisms that ensure adequate sized pools in all markets • Massachusetts combination experience resulted in higher premiums • 2007-2008: premiums in small group grew 5.8%

  15. Plan Selection • Negotiator vs. Facilitator Models • Negotiate with plans to lower rates • Exclude plans with bids that are “too high” or benefits that are inadequate • Greater standardization and easier to compare plans • Facilitate a marketplace- more or less “file and use” • Exchange does not manage plan selection • Greater plan design flexibility and better able to compete with the non-exchange market

  16. Questions&Comments

  17. Contact Us Danielle Jaffee djaffee@nahu.org 703.276.3839 Michael Keegan mkeegan@nahu.org 703.276.3809 Ken Statz saquotecenter@msn.com 440.546.8330 Adam Brackemyre abrackemyre@nahu.org 703.276.3808 Brooke Bell bbell@nahu.org 703.276.3818 Russ Childers childr@bellsouth.net 229.924.7617

  18. Health Insurance Exchanges:What States Are Doing

  19. Existing Exchanges: Massachusetts • Massachusetts Health Insurance Connector established in 2006 • Separate legal entity from the state • Massachusetts Connector Authority • 10 member board, with a spot specifically reserved for a member of the Massachusetts AHU • Financed through premium surcharges on Commonwealth Care and Commonwealth choice products • Individual Mandate • Penalty assessed based on income and cost of the lowest-priced Commonwealth Care plan • Employer Mandate • Offer coverage or a “fair share” contribution

  20. Existing Exchanges: Massachusetts • Connector open to: • Individual Market, “nongroup” • Small Group (2-50) • Limited large group: all employers establish section 125 plans for employees not eligible/offered group coverage • Four Product Tiers: • Bronze- low premium, higher cost-sharing • Silver- moderate premiums, moderate cost-sharing • Gold- high premiums, low cost sharing • Young Adult Plans (YAP)- special low-cost and low benefit coverage for those up to age 26 • Merged small group and individual market pools • Same risk pool inside and outside of connector for each carrier

  21. Existing Exchanges: Utah • Controlled by Office of Consumer Health Services, part of the Governor’s Office of Economic Development • State retains budgetary control and authority • Connector serves as an informational portal • “Travelocity” model • Exchange open to: • Small group (2-50) • No individual market- links individuals to carriers, producers and an insurance plan comparison chart • Launching a large group pilot program this year • Does not administer additional programs

  22. Existing Exchanges: Utah • Exchange functions to allow small employers to offer defined contribution plans • Employer contributes specific amount and employee free to choose plan for themselves • Allow employees to pull money from multiple sources • Individuals can carry plan with them if they change jobs • No employer or individual mandate • No set product levels or plan choices • Small group risk pool combined for inside and outside of the exchange

  23. Developing Legislation • States will likely pass legislation to create the exchange during the 2011 legislative session • States need to provide a business model to HHS in 2013 • Legislation Currently introduced in: • AK, AZ, DC, HI, MD, NJ*, NH, MS TX • NAIC and NAHU models currently circulating • NAIC model very straightforward to what PPACA outlines • Leaves several areas vague for states to determine • States can adapt for their existing markets and insurance laws • No two exchanges will look the same

  24. Key Differences in the NAHU Model • Definition of “Health Insurance Producer” • Establish a producer as an individual licensed to sell health insurance in a state • Navigators and their qualifications • Enrolling individuals in a qualified health plan requires you be licensed and regulated by the State and the Commissioner • Includes all individuals affiliated or employed by an entity facilitating enrollment • Still allows Navigators to serves as informational resource

  25. Key Differences in the NAHU Model • Governance Structure • Public-private partnership • Establish Exchange Board of Directors • Representation: • 3 persons affiliated with state authorized health insurers • 2 licensed health insurance producers • 3 representatives of the general public • 1 state Medicaid representative • Insurance commissioner or his/her designee • Duties • Board accountable to the Insurance Commissioner

  26. What States Are Currently Doing • Nebraska • Working on developing a business model before legislation • Develop structure, financing, authority • Texas • Rep. John Zerwas introduced HB 636 • Bill tracks the NAIC model, but requires 3 of the 5 voting board members to have insurance background • Establishes “Navigator” program consistent with PPACA • Ohio • Received grant from the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation in 2008 • State Coverage Initiative tasked to look at way to cover more Ohio consumers • Recommendations included many PPACA-related reforms

  27. Questions&Comments

  28. Contact Us Danielle Jaffee djaffee@nahu.org 703.276.3839 Michael Keegan mkeegan@nahu.org 703.276.3809 Ken Statz saquotecenter@msn.com 440.546.8330 Adam Brackemyre abrackemyre@nahu.org 703.276.3808 Brooke Bell bbell@nahu.org 703.276.3818 Russ Childers childr@bellsouth.net 229.924.7617

More Related