1 / 67

Denise M. Rousseau H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior

Evidence-Based Management Teaching Managers to Make Better Decisions. Denise M. Rousseau H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA USA. What is Evidence-Based Management?.

samara
Download Presentation

Denise M. Rousseau H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence-Based Management Teaching Managers to Make Better Decisions Denise M. Rousseau H.J. Heinz II University Professor of Organizational Behavior Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA USA

  2. What is Evidence-Based Management? EBMgt is the practice of making organizational decisions based upon conscientious use of • Science-based principles & knowledge • Valid & relevant facts • Critical thinking aided by decision supports • Ethical considerations (i.e., effects on stakeholders)

  3. Why Should We and Our Students Care about EBMgt? Better Decisions by Using Practices that Work (and avoiding those that don’t!) Defensible Decisions that Stand Up to Scrutiny (using best evidence and best process) Developing Expertise throughout aCareer (experience can be a poor teacher--bad habits!) 20 years of valid experience is different than 1 year of experience repeated 20 times!

  4. What does EBMgt Look Like?

  5. Evidence-based Piloting?

  6. 1. Use of Scientific Findings ChesleySullenberger, USAIR pilot, has been a visiting scholar at UC Berkeley’s Collaborative for Catastrophic Risk Management since 2007 Does research on how to make decisions to maintain safety despite technological complexity and crisis conditions

  7. 2. Reliance on Reliable and Valid Organizational Facts Has written and analyzed aviation accident reports for over 20 years

  8. 3. Mindful Decision Making: Becoming Decision Aware Used Decision Aids to Support Good Decision: As Sully considered what decision to make that day, he had his copilot review and follow all checklists on board relevant to crash landings Formal Education to Prime His Skills: Sully is a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy and holds masters degrees from both Purdue University in Industrial Psychology and the University of Northern Colorado in Public Administration

  9. 4. Ethics and Responsibility to Stakeholders The last person to leave the plane, ChesleySullenberger twice walked the plane’s aisle to check all passengers were off Sully’s last act onboard was to grab the passenger list. Used on-shore to verify rescue of all passengers and crew

  10. In Sullenberger’s Own Words… “One way of looking at this might be that for 42 years, I've been making small, regular deposits in this bank of experience, education and training. And on January 15, the balance was sufficient so that I could make a very large withdrawal.”

  11. How Is Sullenberger’s Example Relevant to Your Own Leadership Development?

  12. It’s a career, not a course. EBMgt is a means to improve decision quality.

  13. The Zeitgeist Evidence-based practice movements abound in medicine, education, and public policy Management research from psychology, engineering, operations research (ETC.) yields 1000s of studies annually Internet (scholar.google.com) gives ready access Innovative companies now hiring “chief evidence officers” Public demands accountability (quality decisions that are defensible)

  14. EBMgt Overcomes Limits of Unaided Decisions • Bounded Rationality • The Small Numbers Problem of Individual Experience • Prone to See Patterns Even in Random Data • Critical Thinking • Decision Supports • Research • Large Ns > individual experience • Controls reduce bias The “Human” Problem Evidence-Based Practice

  15. Three approaches Push: teaching management principles based upon a convergent body of research. Pull: teaching students how to find, appraise and apply the evidence from research and their own organizations. Process: focus on the context, steps in decision making and ethics

  16. Five Good EBMgtHabits • Get evidence into the conversation • Teach/Learn Evidence in Manager’s Area of Practice 2a Teach/Learn Use of Scientific Evidence 2b Use Reliable and Valid Business • Learn to Gather Evidence • Become “Decision Aware” • Reflect on decision’s ethical implications

  17. Five Good EBMgtHabits #1 Get evidence into the conversation Regularly ask “what’s the evidence…?” Illustration- Discuss with your seatmates… What’s a practice in your organization that you suspect might not be NOT evidence-based?

  18. Five Good EBMgtHabits #2 Teach/Learn Evidence in Manager’s Area of Practice • Focus on Action Principles Where Science is Clear (On-going Practice of A Professional Manager) • Focus on Business Facts based on valid metrics relevant to your decisions (On-going Practice of Responsible & Transparent Organization)

  19. What is evidence? • Evidenceis not the same as ‘proof’ or ‘hard facts’ • ... can be • - so strong that no one doubts its correctness, or • - so weak that it is hardly convincing at all

  20. Don’t confuse • Evidence of effect (do!) • Evidence of no effect (don’t!) • No evidence of effect (research!)

  21. Five Good EBMgtHabits #2a Teach/Learn Use of Scientific Evidence • Focus on Action Principles Where Science is Clear • Rely on Science-based Sources • Example: Locke’s Handbook of Organizational Behavior (access electronic copy for free) • Peer-reviewed research, especially meta-analyses Reduce dysfunctional variations in practice Build effective routines, procedures, checklists

  22. Five Good EBMgtHabits #2a Teach/Learn Use of Scientific Evidence Best Scientific Evidence is • based on large N (sample size of people/organizations) • well-controlled studies with comparison groups &/or longitudinal data • peer-reviewed

  23. Peer Reviewed Journals

  24. Five Good EBMgtHabits #2b Use Reliable and Valid Business Facts Best Business Facts are • large numbers sampled relative to population (not single or isolated cases, e.g. %sales/# sales calls) • linked to context (season, location, #users, etc.) • provide key indicators for business decisions

  25. Five Good EBMgtHabits Illustration--Discuss with your seatmates… • What indicators does your organization most commonly use to make important decisions? • Are these the “best business facts” you need to make these decisions? • What indicators would be more useful, if you could get them??

  26. Help Learner How to Interpret Business Facts # Medication errors in Unit 1 were 200% greater in 2011 than Unit 2’s. Is patient safety worse in Unit 1? Depends on number of unsafe incidents divided by # patients or # procedures—needs a control. Mike has w/10 subordinates & 20% turnover while Kim has 55 employees & 10% turnover. Is retention better in one?Hard to determine. Small N’s have greater bias and are more variable. McDonald’s stores average 300+% turnover/year. Does Mickey D. have a problem?Depends on industry comparison and business strategy. Company A managers focus decisions on monthly cost, downtime and revenues. Company B managers focus on service quality, employee retention and profitability by customer category. So what? B’s more diverse performance criteria can promote attention to longer-term and growth-oriented outcomes. A’s narrower economic focus can promote shorter-term thinking.

  27. Five Good EBMgtHabits #3 Learn to Gather Evidence • Structure and pose a managerial question • Search for best available evidence (check out Google Scholar or CEBMa website) • Critically appraise information found • Apply relevant case information to decision • Write down the decision made, assumptions, and expected outcomes • Evaluate outcomes over time

  28. Five Good EBMgtHabits Gathering Evidence is a 5-step approach Formulate an answerable question (PICOC) Search for the best available evidence Critical appraise the quality of the found evidence Integrate the evidence with managerial expertise and organizational concerns and apply Monitor and evaluate the results

  29. Getting the (Scientific) Evidence What kind of evidence are we looking for? • Studies with a design that best answers your question • Studies with the highest level of evidence

  30. Levels of internal validity

  31. Which study for which question? Explanation

  32. Levels of internal validity It is shown that … It is likely that … There are signs that … Experts are of the opinion that …

  33. Practice Searching for EvidenceUsing “Google Scholar” • Learning through play ! • Try all buttons • Make lots of mistakes • Have fun! • Just do it!

  34. Five Good EBMgtHabits #4 Become “Decision Aware” • Identify different kinds of decisions learners face? What kinds of different approaches are used to them? Why? • How can you determine whether you made a “good decision” when you cannot know the outcome? (The answer to this question is what is known as “decision quality”)

  35. Five Good EBMgt Habits “Decision Awareness” Promotes Decision Quality • To manage decisions, know what decisions must be made. • Map out decisions that affect key outcomes. • Who is responsible? (Are they prepared?) • What information is required? (Will it be available when needed?)

  36. Five Good EBMgtHabits Awareness Calls Attention to Decision Process. Proper Processes Improve Decision Quality • What is the process for making the decision? • Different processes work better… • for routine decisions (create validated checklists and action plans) • for decisions with known unknowns (systematic sequence of considerations) • for decisions with unknown unknowns (pilot-tests and trial/ experiment) • Decisions have an “aftermath” and a “pre-math” that a good manager actively manages. Is the decision well-managed? Help make it so.

  37. Using Evidence Well Requires Your Own Critical Judgment

  38. Five Good EBMgtHabits #5 Reflect on Decision’s Ethical Implications Who are stakeholders for this decision? Possible effects? How might the decision be altered to optimize positive stakeholder effects and reduce negative?

  39. Five Good EBMgtHabits Scientific Principles for Effective Teaching Set learning goals (2-5) Pre-test: where does learner stand on learning goal before course Build opportunities for practicing those learnings throughout course (curriculum) Post-test: Measure progress on each learning goal and provide feedback Feedback & Redesign: Use feedback to make course more effective over time

  40. Turning Evidence into Practice & Practice into Evidence Turning evidence into practice Evidence basedmanagement:closing the gap between research and practice

  41. Turning evidence into practice Got Evidence? References J. Ehrlinger, K. Johnson, M. Banner, D. Dunning, J. Kruger. (2008) Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105,(1) pg. 98 E.A. Locke (ed.), Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior, 2nd edition, 2009. Malden, MA: Blackwell. D. M. Rousseau (2012) Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, New York. D.M. Rousseau, D.M. & E. Barends (2011) Becoming an evidence-based manager. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 221-235. D.M. Rousseau, J. Manning & D. Denyer (2008) Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through reflective reviews. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 475-515. R.C. Schank, D. Llyras & E. Soloway (2010) The future of decision making. New York: Palmgrave Macmillan. J.F. Yates. (2003). Decision management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. J.F. Yates & M.D. Tschirhart (2006).  Decision making expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman. (Eds.).  Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 421-438).  New York: Cambridge University Press. J.F. Yates, E.S. Veinott & A.L. Patalano (2003). Hard decisions, bad decisions: On decision quality and decision aiding. In S. L. Schneider & J. C. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 13-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  42. Turning evidence into practice Appendix: How to conduct a CAT

  43. CAT: CriticallyAppraised Topic

  44. CAT: CriticallyAppraised Topic A Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) is a structured, short (3 pages max) summary of evidence on a topic of interest, usually focused around a practical problem or question. A CAT is like a “quick and dirty” version of a systematic review, summarizing the best available research evidence on a topic. Usually more than one study is included in a CAT. Examples: http://www.cebma.org/presentations/

  45. CAT: structure • Question (PICOC) • Background / context • Search strategy • Results / evidence summary • Comments (limitations) • Conclusion • Practical relevance • References

  46. Asking the Right Question?

  47. Asking the Right Question? Does team-building work? Does leadership development training work? Does management development improve the performance of managers? Does employee participation prevent resistance to change? Is 360 degree feedback effective?

  48. Answerable Question: PICOC P= Population I = Intervention (or success factor) C= Comparison O= Outcome / Objectives C = Context

  49. Answerable Question: PICOC Scenario: You are a consultant, your client is an insurance company, there are plans for a merger, you have heard that the other company has a different culture, you want to know if this will effect the outcome P= Organizations with a different corporate culture I = Merger C = Organizations with a similar corporate culture O = Long term profitability C = Profit organizations, competitive market

  50. Search terms Operationalise your Pico elements! O= long term profitability? Share holder value? Return on investment? Return on assets? EBIT? Employee productivity? Profit margin? Competitive position? Corporate image? Innovation power? Market share? Customer satisfaction?

More Related