1 / 31

Julie Hibben, SPF SIG Project Director

Iowa’s Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG). Iowa Department of Public Health, Division of Behavioral Health. Julie Hibben, SPF SIG Project Director Debbie Synhorst, SPF SIG Project Coordinator & Prevention Consultant Dr. Ousmane Diallo , Epidemiologist.

santos
Download Presentation

Julie Hibben, SPF SIG Project Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Iowa’s Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) • Iowa Department of Public Health, Division of Behavioral Health Julie Hibben, SPF SIG Project Director Debbie Synhorst, SPF SIG Project Coordinator & Prevention Consultant Dr. Ousmane Diallo, Epidemiologist

  2. Webinar Instructions • Open and close your panel • View, select, and test your audio (call is silenced) • Submit text questions • Q&A addressed at the end of today’s session • A recorded version of today’s session will be available

  3. SPF SIG Characteristics • Iowa received funding in July 2009 from the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), SAMHSA • $2.13 million for five years • 15% for state-level activities • 85% for community-level activities after Strategic Plan is approved • Build system capacity at the state and local level

  4. CSAP’s Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grants by Cohort I -V WEST CENTRAL Montana Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council Nooksack Indian Tribe Confederate Salish and Kootenai Tribes Red Lake Nation Oglala Sioux Tribe NORTHEAST Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Northern Arapaho Tribe Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council California Native American Health Center WA ME Grand Traverse Band ND MT VT MN NH OR WI NY MA Northern Mariana Islands ID SD RI MI WY CT PA IA NJ DE NV IN OH IL NE UT MD WV Marshall Islands CA CO VA District of Columbia KS KY MO NC Palau TN AZ OK SC AR NM SOUTHEAST AL GA MS Federated States of Micronesia Tohono O’dham Nation LA Puerto Rico TX Pueblo of Acoma Hawaii First Nations Community Health Source FL AmericanSamoa Winnebago Tribe Cook Inlet Tribal Council US Virgin Islands Cherokee Nation OK Inter-Tribal Consortium (ITC) Guam Dena Nena Henash (TCC) AK SOUTHWEST Cohort V Partnerships for Success Northeast: ME,NY,NH,VT,MA,CT,RI,PA,NJ,MD,DE Southeast: KY,VA,TN,NC,SC,MS,AL,GA,FL, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands Central: ND,SD,MN,IA,WI,IL,MI, IN,OH,WV, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council, Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians, Grand Traverse Band, Oglala Sioux Tribe, Leech Lake Band of OjibweSouthwest: NE,CO,KS,MO,NM,OK,AR,LA,TX, Cherokee Nation, Winnebago Tribe, First Nations Community Health Source, Pueblo of Acoma, Oklahoma Inter-Tribal Consortium West: WA, MT,OR,WY,CA,NV,UT,AZ,AK,HI, California Native American Health Center, Northern Arapaho Tribe, Montana Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council, Tohono O’dham Nation, Confederate Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Dena NenaHenash, Cook Inlet Tribal Council, Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, American Samoa, Palau Cohort IV Cohort I Cohort III Cohort II

  5. SPF SIG Goals • Prevent the onset & reduce the progression of substance abuse, including childhood & underage drinking • Reduce substance abuse-related problems in communities • Build prevention capacity & infrastructure at the State and local levels

  6. SPF SIG Key Principles • Data Driven Process • Across the Lifespan • Public Health Approach • Consumption and Consequence • Different Planning Model

  7. Project Overview Advisory Council Expectations • Attend Advisory Council Meetings • Connection to the Governor’s Office • Community as well State perspective • Diversity representative of the State population • Focus on getting the work done • Positive relationship to SPF SIG staff and with the SEW

  8. Project Overview Advisory Council Responsibilities • Deciding on Project Priorities • Definition of Community • Sub-recipient Selection • Funding Allocation • Approving the Strategic Plan • Receiving training • Oversee subcommittees • Review local implementation plans

  9. Project Overview Advisory Council Responsibilities • Develop Logic Model and Action Plan for the state level • Review evaluations • Suggest project improvement • Work towards sustainability of the Advisory Council

  10. Project Overview Advisory Council Workgroups • Evidence-Based Practice • Evaluation • Training • Cultural Competency

  11. Table of Organization SAMHSA, CSAP Governor of Iowa IDPH, DBH Consortium RET Capacity Coaches SEW SPF SIG Advisory Council Cultural Competence EBP Training Evaluation 23 SPF SIG Funded Counties

  12. Project Overview State Epidemiological Workgroup • Established in 2006 by funding through CSAP • Representation from a variety of state agencies • The SEW assesses, analyzes, interprets and communicate s data about Iowa substance consumption patterns and consequences • State Epidemiological Profile • Important resource to the SPF process

  13. Project Overview SPF SIG Priorities • Decided by Advisory Council after reviewing State Epidemiological Profile data • Two priorities include: • Reduce underage alcohol use (under age 21) • Reduce adult binge drinking (18 and over)

  14. Project Overview Sub-recipient Selection Process • Highest Need Model • Community is defined as “county” • Indicators included 11th grade 30 day alcohol use, adult binge drinking, and a composite law enforcement construct • Counties were ranked and scored • 23 counties were identified

  15. Project Overview Funding Sub-recipients • Contact Amendment with the Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention agencies • Collaboration Agreement with Drug Free Communities, other coalitions and stakeholders • Jointly developed, signed and submitted to IDPH for approval

  16. Project Overview Capacity Coaches • Establish a team of 8 coaches • RFP Process • Coaches Will: • Provide Regional Training • Provide Technical Assistance • Develop New Trainings and Materials • Participate in the Training Workgroup

  17. Strategic Prevention Framework • Step 1: Assessment • Step 2: Capacity • Step 3: Planning • Step 4: Implementation • Step 5: Evaluation Inherent within each step is cultural competency and sustainability

  18. Assessment State • Maintain a State Epidemiological Workgroup (SEW) • Update the State Epidemiological Profile Community • Creation of a Local EPI Workgroup • Community Assessment Workbook

  19. Capacity State • Training for communities, Advisory Council members and other stakeholders • Strengthening Relationships Community • Capacity Assessment • Cultural Competency Plan • Training

  20. Planning State • Develop a Strategic Plan • Process led by Advisory Council • Plan has to be approved by CSAP Community • Develop Action Plan/Logic Model • Identify Evidence-Based Strategies • Reviewed and Approved by the Evidence-Based Practice Workgroup

  21. Implementation State • Strategic Plan • Assist communities with implementation Community • Execute plans created in Step 3 • Strategies must be evidence based • Federal List of Evidence-Based Programs • Peer reviewed journal with proven effectiveness • Documented effectiveness

  22. Evaluation State • Evaluation of outcome and process data • Promote sustainability of effective programs, policies and practices Community • Evaluation of local outcome and process data • Use of Data collection systems including the Online Documentation Support System (ODSS) and the Management Reporting Tool (MRT)

  23. Cultural Competency • Infuse Throughout the SPF Process • Training • Cultural Competency Plan • Focus on Specific Involvement • Youth • Returning veterans and their families

  24. Sustainability • Infuse Throughout the Process • Training • Sustainability Plan

  25. Features of Iowa’s SPF SIG • Non-Competitive Funding Process • Collaboration between prevention agencies, Drug Free Communities and other coalitions • Evidence-Based Environmental Strategies • Online Documentation Support System (ODSS) • Capacity Coaches/Available Training

  26. Features of Iowa’s SPF SIG • Focus on Returning Veterans and their Families • Iowa EPI Website http://iconsortium.subst-abuse.uiowa.edu/EPI/MainFrame.html • Media Campaign • Continuation of SEW and Iowa Youth Survey • Other Funding Sources Using SPF Process

  27. Timeline • Webinars on March 16 and March 23 • Capacity Coaches announced on March 23 • Invitation letters to be sent out the week of March 14 • Collaboration Agreement due May 6 • Regional trainings on the Assessment and Capacity steps in June

  28. Questions?

  29. Resources • Dr. Ousmane Diallo, Epidemiologist ousmane.diallo@idph.iowa.gov • Julie Hibben, Project Director julie.hibben@idph.iowa.gov • Patrick McGovern, Lead Evaluator patrick-mcgovern@uiowa.edu • Debbie Synhorst, Project Coordinator deborah.synhorst@idph.iowa.gov

  30. Resources • SPF SIG Webpage www.idph.state.ia.us/spfsig/default.asp

More Related