'Common criteria' presentation slideshows

Data Security E2002, Lecture 1 August 30, 2002

Data Security E2002, Lecture 1 August 30, 2002. 000-015 History Background - Batch - Remote access, DB, RACF - Orange Book - ITSec, Common Criteria - Code of Practice - BS 7799, ISO 17799 - ISO TR 13335 - DS 484. 015-030 What is Information Security ?

1.1k views • 102 slides

IT Audit Methodologies

IT Audit Methodologies. IT Audit Methodologies. IT Audit Methodologies. CobiT BS 7799 - Code of Practice (CoP) BSI - IT Baseline Protection Manual ITSEC Common Criteria (CC). IT Audit Methodologies - URLs. CobiT: www.isaca.org BS7799: www.bsi.org.uk/disc/

889 views • 64 slides

Security Engineering

Security Engineering. Overview. Software Engineering Requirements Engineering (Security) Common Criteria early stages Threat / Risk Analysis Security Objectives / Requirements / Functions Example(s) : Public Key Infrastructures, E-Voting. Software (Security) Engineering.

741 views • 56 slides

Deep Dive on Oracle SuperCluster: Engineered for Extreme Efficiency

Deep Dive on Oracle SuperCluster: Engineered for Extreme Efficiency. Dechang Gu Hunter Li Oracle. Program Agenda. A Glimpse Inside SuperCluster SuperCluster in Action: Customer Experiences The New SuperCluster T5-8 How Did We Do It? How Can I Take Advantage of Oracle SuperCluster?.

1.06k views • 50 slides

Evaluating System Security CS 136 Computer Security Peter Reiher March 5, 2010

648 views • 50 slides

Quantification of Integrity

591 views • 48 slides

Quantification of Integrity

584 views • 47 slides

Security Certifications and Building a Secure System

553 views • 45 slides

Common Criteria

Common Criteria. Dawn Schulte Leigh Anne Winters. Outline. What is the Common Criteria? Origins of the Common Criteria Common Criteria Basics Security Functional Requirements Security Assurance Requirements Evaluation Assurance Levels Common Criteria in the US Common Criteria and C&A

830 views • 34 slides

Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 20

402 views • 30 slides

Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products ( EQuIP )

Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products ( EQuIP ). Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric. Development of the Tri-State Rubric. Work began by Tri-State Collaborative Comprised of educational leaders from Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island

418 views • 29 slides

Federal Geographic Data Committee Update

Federal Geographic Data Committee Update. Karen Siderelis/Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting May 12, 2009. Topics. Karen Siderelis: Transition Update FGDC Executive Committee Activities Imagery for the Nation Update Ivan DeLoatch: Recovery.gov Geospatial Line of Business

415 views • 26 slides

Quantification of Integrity

358 views • 23 slides

Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process

Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process. Fiona Crozier QAA f.crozier@qaa.ac.uk. Structure of presentation. Brief overview of the Bologna process The Berlin Mandate General overview of ENQA Projects (TEEP/QCS) Conclusion. Brief overview of the Bologna process. Its aims:

523 views • 23 slides

Online Voting Opportunities and Risks

372 views • 20 slides

Annual Pupil Profile

376 views • 19 slides

Protecting Infrastructure from Cyber Attacks

Protecting Infrastructure from Cyber Attacks. Dr. Maurice Dawson, Walden University /Alabama A&M University Dr. Jonathan Abramson, Colorado Technical University Dr. Marwan Omar, Colorado Technical University. Abstract.

268 views • 15 slides

Mil-OSS LANT Welcome & Open Source within SSC-LANT

260 views • 12 slides

NANC Report Future of Numbering Working Group (FoN)

NANC Report Future of Numbering Working Group (FoN). FoN Co-Chairs Don Gray, Nebraska PSC Adam Newman, Telcordia Technologies Jim Castagna, Verizon October 22, 2010. Summary of Activity Since Last Report. Sought feedback from a NANC member that wanted to further consider the white paper

190 views • 9 slides

Fake Fingers in Fingerprint Recognition Assia Tria , Claude Barral*, Abdel Yakoub* and Sebastien Sanaur*

Materials. Introduction. GOALS. Contacts. Methodology. Our contribution. Kind of sensors. Test and results. Conclusion.

449 views • 1 slides