1 / 27

Dubuque County Initial Stakeholder Meeting April 20, 2011

Dubuque County Initial Stakeholder Meeting April 20, 2011. Welcome and Introductions. Project Overview. SPF SIG Characteristics. Iowa received funding in July 2009 from the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), SAMHSA $2.13 million for five years 15% for state-level activities

sef
Download Presentation

Dubuque County Initial Stakeholder Meeting April 20, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dubuque County Initial Stakeholder Meeting April 20, 2011

  2. Welcome and Introductions

  3. Project Overview

  4. SPF SIG Characteristics • Iowa received funding in July 2009 from the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), SAMHSA • $2.13 million for five years • 15% for state-level activities • 85% for community-level activities after Strategic Plan is approved • Build system capacity at the state and local level

  5. Project Overview

  6. Project Overview SPF SIG Priorities • Reduce underage alcohol use (under age 21) • Reduce adult binge drinking (18 and over)

  7. Project Overview Sub-recipient Selection Process • Highest Need Model • Community is defined as “county” • Indicators included 11th grade 30 day alcohol use, adult binge drinking, and law enforcement data • Counties were ranked and scored • 23 counties were identified

  8. Strategic Prevention Framework • Step 1: Assessment • Step 2: Capacity • Step 3: Planning • Step 4: Implementation • Step 5: Evaluation Inherent within each step is cultural competency and sustainability

  9. Assessment Community • Creation of a Local EPI Workgroup • Community Assessment Workbook

  10. Capacity Community • Capacity Assessment • Cultural Competency Plan • Training

  11. Planning Community • Develop Action Plan/Logic Model • Identify Evidence-Based Strategies • Reviewed and Approved by the Evidence-Based Practice Workgroup

  12. Implementation Community • Execute plans created in Step 3 • Strategies must be evidence based • Federal List of Evidence-Based Programs • Peer reviewed journal with proven effectiveness • Documented effectiveness

  13. Evaluation Community • Evaluation of local outcome and process data • Use of Data collection systems including the Online Documentation Support System (ODSS) and the Management Reporting Tool (MRT)

  14. Cultural Competency • Infused Throughout the SPF Process • Training • Cultural Competency Plan • Focus on Specific Involvement • Youth • Returning veterans and their families

  15. Sustainability • Infused Throughout the Process • Training • Sustainability Plan

  16. Questions

  17. Creating The LEW • Epidemiological Workgroup created by May 13 • Membership to include at least 3 people • Includes the SPF coordinator, but the coordinator cannot be the chair • Will meet monthly, possibly more often in beginning • Members should: • be interested in data collection, analysis and dissemination • Represent more than one agency or organization

  18. Responsibilities of the LEW Chair • Can be a subcontracted position • Attend regional SPF trainings • Attend at least one contractor meeting each year • Will oversee completion of • Community assessment workbook (CAW) • Collecting local data • Baseline workbook • Update the CAW on a yearly basis • Cross-site evaluation surveys and other questionnaires • Help identify data gaps and other community indicators

  19. LEW Volunteers or suggestions for membership

  20. Identifying Current Efforts • Reducing underage and binge drinking • Shared priority areas and consequences

  21. Leading Us Forward: Project Coordinator • Full time position • IDPH has said that this person can be hired by the prevention agency, Drug Free Community grantee or other substance abuse prevention coalition • Decisions to make: • Who will hire the coordinator? • Where will the coordinator be housed? • Who will directly supervise the coordinator?

  22. Leading Us Forward: Project Coordinator • Identify local options • Each interested organization will briefly share • Ability to hire, supervise and/or house • Ability to provide a county wide substance abuse prevention effort • Other relevant information

  23. Leading Us Forward: Project Coordinator • Create Guiding Questions

  24. Moving Ahead Together • We need to ensure: • Continued stakeholder input • A countywide effort • Ongoing coalition involvement • Youth involvement

  25. Timeline and Next Steps • Collaborative Agreement and MOU • Due May 6 • LEW members identified • Due May 13 • Was anyone missing from the table today?

  26. Thank You! Additional information Iowa’s SPF SIG website www.iowaspfsig.org Helping Services for Northeast Iowa Clare Jones, Director of Prevention Services 563-582-5317 cjones@helpingservices.org

More Related