1 / 17

A Narrative-Discursive Approach to Self and Identity

A Narrative-Discursive Approach to Self and Identity. michael bamberg. Clark University Department of Psychology Worcester, MA, USA. What Is the Self? Mark Leary: Editorial in Self &Identity, 3 (1). 5 ways in which Self has been appropriated: as a synonym for person

selina
Download Presentation

A Narrative-Discursive Approach to Self and Identity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Narrative-Discursive Approach to Self and Identity michael bamberg Clark University Department of Psychology Worcester, MA, USA

  2. What Is the Self?Mark Leary: Editorial in Self &Identity, 3 (1) 5 ways in which Self has been appropriated: • as a synonym for person • as a synonym for personality • self-as-knower • self-as-known • self as decision-maker and doer Self as speaker/narrator - responding to the question: Who Are You?

  3. Three Kinds of Narrative Approaches to the Study of Self and Identity • Life-Story Approaches • Life-Event Approaches • “Small” Stories • Short narrative accounts • Embedded in every-day interactions • Unnoticed as ‘stories’ by the participants • Unnoticed as ‘narratives’ by researchers • But highly relevant for identity formation processes

  4. Life-Stories Dan McAdams (1993) + Gabi Rosenthal (1998) Elicitation Technique Analysis of lives Focus on coherence + health Life-Events Most narrative research Elicitation is focused on particular events or experiences Analysis of focused area Meaning of event in one’s life Life-Stories + Life-Events

  5. Merits of narrative ‘life research’life-history + life-event approaches • Accentuates and brings to light lived experience • Forces participants to focus on the meaning of THAT event in their lives • Accentuates the continuity of experience • And sheds light on aspects that appear discontinuous • Assumes a unified sense of personal identity -- against which ‘experience’ is constantly sorted out

  6. potential shortcomingsor open questions • How does this ‘unified sense of self’ come to existence? • How does the person ‘learn’ to “sort out” events against what is called ‘life’? • Overemphasis of stories about the ‘self’ • Cutting out all those stories about others • Overemphasis of ‘long’ stories • Cutting out everyday, “small” stories

  7. why? • Influences of ‘traditional’ psychological inquiry • Interests in selves + self-coherence • Influences of traditional narratology • Work with texts (written texts) • Assuming authors as behind the texts • Assuming criteria of goodness for narratives • Interviews as windows into selves

  8. Narrative Dimensions(Ochs & Capps, 2001) • Tellership • one active teller vs. many • Tellability • high vs. low • Embeddedness • detached from surrounding talk vs. situational embeddedness • Moral stance • one moral message vs. different + conflicting messages • Linearity & Temporality • closed temporal + causal order vs. open + spatial

  9. with this in mind:Let’s turn to SMALL stories • Characteristics of “small” stories • Functions of “small” stories • in everyday conversations • in the process of identity formation • in learning to present ‘coherent’ selves • What these small stories accomplish in everyday situations

  10. Stories about others:the Davie Hogan story Positioning with Davie Hogan. Stories, Tellings & Identities. Chapter in: C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society.  London: Sage. (2003)

  11. Topic: gay kids at school J: actually I know a few of them  I don’t know them but I’ve seen them Ed how can you tell they’re gayAlex yeah you can’t really tellJ:no like how do I know they’re gayEd yeahJ:well he’s an 11th grade student  the kid I know  I’m not gonna mention namesEd alright who are they (raising both hands up)J:okay um  and I’m in a class with mostly 11th gradersJosh: and his name is (rising intonation)

  12. ah and and ah  and  um  a girl  who is umm very honest and nice she has she has a locker right next to him and she said he talked about how he is gay a lot when she’s there  not with her  like um  so that’s how I know  and he um associates with um a lot of girls not many boys  a lot of the  a few  of the gay kids at Cassidy

  13. Pre-Story Negotiation +Fine Tuning • Pre-Negotiations • “I don’t know them but I’ve seen them” • Challenge: “how do you know?” • “how do I know they’re gay?” • “he’s an 11th-grader” + “I’m in a class with 11th-graders” • Fine-Tuning • Why does he claim not to “know” them (and only having “seen” them)? • Why is his witness “honest” + “nice” • Why is she “a girl”? • Why is the gay boy not talking to her <that he is gay>? • Why is he ‘mentioning’ that the gay boy “associates with a lot of girls” rather than boys?

  14. Positioning • Vis-à-vis his audience • I know about gays • I’m not “close to them” (= don’t get the wrong idea!!!) • Vis-à-vis the master-narratives of heterosexuality + liberal discourse • Gays as ‘others’ • Self as tolerant person • Vis-à-vis a ‘sense of self’ • Practicing/working toward/testing out a sense of “this is me”

  15. Characteristics of “SMALL” stories • Short • Conversationally Embedded + Negotiated • before • during • after • Fine tuned positioning strategies • fine-tuned vis-à-vis the audience • fine-tuned vis-à-vis dominant + counter narratives • multiple moral stances (testing out and experimenting with identity projections) • Low in tellability, linearity, temporality + causality

  16. Functions of “SMALL” stories • Practice in doing identity work • Continuous editing of experience • Retelling of experience • Re-tuning these tellings according to • different audiences • Different master-narratives • different (developing) senses of ‘who-I-am’ • Resulting in some sense of coherence • though one that is constantly reworked

  17. conclusion • So, rather than assuming the existence of identity + sense of self – and viewing narratives as reflections thereof, I am suggesting to study the emergence of a sense of self by way of exploring the SMALL stories people tell in their EVERYDAY interactions

More Related