1 / 10

Group Participants

Group Participants. Rich F Martin L Pete M Pam P Bob M Chuck S Natasha D Caroline H. Data Questions. What data needed to characterize CLs across broad landscapes (extensive) What data are needed to establish cause/effect relationships (intensive) How can we leverage existing data

senona
Download Presentation

Group Participants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group Participants • Rich F • Martin L • Pete M • Pam P • Bob M • Chuck S • Natasha D • Caroline H

  2. Data Questions • What data needed to characterize CLs across broad landscapes (extensive) • What data are needed to establish cause/effect relationships (intensive) • How can we leverage existing data • What addtl data are needed • How to fill gaps

  3. Four levels of data collection & analyses Intensive Sites I Gradient Survey G. S. Modeling* Probability Survey P. S. Extensive Sites Extensive * Allows for the identification of prioritized parameters

  4. Extensive Sites • NADP/NTN • IMPROVE • ECOMAP • MDN • Natl wetland inventory • NHD • TEUI • Human pop density maps • NEI • AIRS

  5. Extensive Sites – cont’d • Remote Sensing • Hyperspectral imagry • Tree health – insect/disease • MODUS (AQUA & TERRA) • Airborne lidar – canopy structure • Soil depth to bedrock? • Soil mosture

  6. Probability Surveys • EMAP and FS Sfc water surveys • FIA/FHM • CWA 305B, 303D – STORET • Terrestrial survey (R3)

  7. Gradient Surveys • Allows scaling from intensive to extensive • Linking can b e done via R. S. • Needs linking to maps (e.g., weathering) • Sources are from projects • Examples • NAWQA Synoptics • CA Bay Delta Study • PACFISH

  8. Intensive Sites • Look at 7 remaining candidate FS sites identified from 2004 • CENR intensive sites • LTER • Experimental Forests (FS) • NPS 3 intensive sites • RMNP (Loch Vale), GSMNP, SNP • LTBMU • WACAP – NPS toxics • NPS Vital signs program • W. Adirondacks/Poconos, Catskills

  9. Data Needs • Natl forest soils inventory • Regional maps of weathering • Disturbance maps • Fire • Harvesting • Drought • Extreme events • Additional intensive sites

  10. Key Points • Western intensive sites/data are less certain in the west due to diversity, elevation differences, site sparseness • Data need to be collected simultaneously for both aquatic and terrestrial • Not just class I areas • Initial focus is on forests (prototype sites) but soon find alpine and range sites

More Related