1 / 15

Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds”

Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds”. Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006. New Rules that Develop to Govern Electronic Information Are Applicable to Hard Copy. The “Litigation Hold” Doctrine.

serena
Download Presentation

Electronic Communication “ Litigation Holds”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electronic Communication“Litigation Holds” Steven Raskovich University Counsel California State University PSSOA Conference – March 23, 2006

  2. New Rules that Develop to Govern Electronic Information Are Applicable to Hard Copy

  3. The “Litigation Hold” Doctrine • Applies wherever litigation is “reasonably foreseeable” • Requires that a “hold” be placed on all relevant information • Risk an adverse inference at trial for any missing information

  4. When is litigation reasonably foreseeable?Not a bright line • A government claim, tort claim, special investigation, or regulatory audit • Contractual performance issues • A major accident or injury • Incident that results in a police report • When an employee is terminated • Whistleblower and whistleblower retaliation claims • Third party requests indemnification • A party says that s/he is going to sue

  5. Other Situations • Multiple complaints about the same practice • Experience with similar situations • Investigations that corroborate complaints • Where the party holding information is contemplating its own lawsuit

  6. Other Considerations • There must be actual notice of a specific and definite claim • The value of the claim is irrelevant • The scope or nature of the claim is irrelevant • ·personal injury cases - 24% • ·   intellectual property cases - 20% • ·contract cases - 18% • ·employment cases - 15% • ·other - 23%

  7. What to do when circumstances call for a “Litigation Hold” • Must preserve evidence • Interrupt regular document retention/destruction schedules • Includes all forms of electronic communication in all locations and forms • Must protect against overwriting • What to do about “deleted” data? Back-up tapes? • Best to have a team to set up a unique plan • Must instruct all who hold evidence • Must repeat instructions • Must hold all evidence until litigation is resolved

  8. Issues • Laptops and home computers • People forget – need repeated instructions • Failure to do a complete enough inventory at the start – voice information • Remember that some information will be “redacted” prior to production • Failure to appreciate technical issues - metadata

  9. Consequences • Attorneys’ fees and costs • Preclusion of evidence at trial • Instructions to jury to draw adverse inference • Dismissal or default judgment

  10. Case Law • Coleman Holdings Inc. v. Morgan Stanley - 2005 • Failure to coordinate search for backup tapes led to late discovery of more than 2,500 tapes, and partial default judgment, which contributed to a jury verdict of $1.5 billion • United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. - 2004 • Eleven senior executives failed to follow internal procedures for preservation of evidence; court barred witnesses from testifying at trial and imposed total sanctions of $2,750,000 • Zubulake v. UBS Warburg -- 2004 • Failure to communicate within organization and with counsel led to late production and loss of data, warranted adverse inference instructions; jury returned $29,000,000 verdict

  11. Lessons Learned • Importance of having regular document retention/destruction policies • Importance of putting together a team to establish a plan for each unique case • Importance of good communication throughout process with the right persons

  12. The Future The End of the Adversary Discovery Process?

More Related