1 / 12

Measuring Quality of Employment: Sub-dimension 4b – Social Protection

This document provides an overview of the sub-dimension 4b of the measurement framework for quality of employment, focusing on social protection indicators for workers.

sgunning
Download Presentation

Measuring Quality of Employment: Sub-dimension 4b – Social Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring Quality of Employment:Sub-dimension 4b – Social Protection Monica D. Castillo Senior Statistician, ILO Department of Statistics Email: castillom@ilo.org Meeting of the Group of Experts on Measuring Quality of Employment Seventh session, 11-13 September 2013 Palais des Nations, Geneva ILO Department of Statistics

  2. Contents • Brief introduction to the sub-dimension • Indicators with no or very minor (non-substantial) changes since 2011 • Indicators that have been removed • Indicators with substantial changes • New indicators • Indicator sheets and glossary • Issues for discussion ILO Department of Statistics

  3. Brief introduction to Sub-dimension 4b – Social Protection (1) • Covers: • Small set of indicators on workers that contribute to social protection schemes for contingencies of old age or unemployment only • Workers contributing to schemes (2 indicators) • Amount of insurance payment (1 indicator) • Does not cover: • Worker contributions to social protection for contingencies caused by sickness, old age, survival, and disability (pension); maternity, employment injury, death of a family member (if not long-term benefit or pension); • Social protection indicators related to a lack of access or unaffordable access to health care • Social protection indicators on insufficient family support, particularly for children and adult dependants • Social protection measures related to general poverty and social exclusion. ILO Department of Statistics

  4. Brief introduction to Sub-dimension 4b – Social Protection (2) Three indicators included: • 4.b1 Percentage of employed persons contributing to a pension scheme • 4.b2 Percentage of employees who are active contributors to unemployment insurance • 4.b3 Mean unemployment insurance payment as a percentage of mean earnings ILO Department of Statistics

  5. Indicators with no or very minor (non-substantial) changes since 2011 Two indicators with minor changes: 1) Previous title:Share of employees covered by unemployment insurance Current title: 4.b2 Percentage of employees who are active contributors to unemployment insurance • Language changes made for greater concept precision 2) Previous title:Average weekly unemployment insurance payment as a share of average weekly wage Current title: 4.b3 Mean unemployment insurance payment as a percentage of mean earnings • Language changes made for greater concept precision and “monthly” is now suggested in the formula (not indicated in the new title) over “weekly” ILO Department of Statistics

  6. Indicators that have been removed since 2011 • Only one indicator removed • Indicator name: Public social security expenditure as a share of GDP • Reason: At Nov. 2012 EG meeting, it was decided to remove it from sub-dimension 4b since it is not directly related to the measurement of QE • Suggestion at last EG meeting: Include as a context indicator (it is now part of the suggested list) ILO Department of Statistics

  7. Indicators with substantial changes • Only one indicator with substantial changes • Previous title:Share of economically active population contributing to a pension fund • Current title: 4.b1 Percentage of employed persons contributing to a pension scheme • Reason: Comments received from reviewers suggested changing EAP to employed persons to be consistent with the QE measurement framework. • Suggestion: include a new context indicator to cover percentage of EAP contributing to a pension scheme (not yet included) ILO Department of Statistics

  8. New indicators • No new indicators added to date • Proposal: suggest for consideration the inclusion of two new indicators for countries where relevant: • Percentage of employed persons who are active contributors to a health insurance scheme • Percentage of employed persons whose families are covered by a health insurance scheme through the employed person‘s contribution to the scheme. • Justification: universal healthcare systems are not available in all states for all workers or their families • NOTE: Interpretation guidelines should indicate the need to analyse these indicators (if selected by a country) jointly with an indicator on the existence and coverage of a public healthcare system ILO Department of Statistics

  9. Indicator sheets and glossary (1) • Indicators refer exclusively to contributory social protection schemes for the contingencies of old age and unemployment only • Essential to take into account any existing non-contrib. schemes for a more complete picture of social protection of employed persons • Two of three indicators defined only by employed/employee contributorsto social protection schemes • thus may present a partial view of scheme contributors • Different recommended sources for numerator and denominator in 2/3 indicators • Not ideal: potential for differences in coverage, data reference periods, etc. ILO Department of Statistics

  10. Indicator sheets and glossary (2) • Differences in concept definitions, geo. coverage, coverage of beneficiaries, and reference period will affect int’l data comparability • EU-LFS: not designed to produce estimates for the calculation of these indicators • 28 terms are defined in the glossary • Links included • Note included regarding the 19th ICLS where revised draft standards on labour force and work statistics will be discussed for adoption ILO Department of Statistics

  11. Issues for discussion • Indicator 4.b1: change to “employed” or keep EAP (or labour force)? • If 4.b1 is changed to “employed”, ILO recommends adding a new context indicator on “percentage of unemployed persons contributing to a pension scheme”. • Should we consider adding two new indicators?: • Percentage of employed persons who are active contributors to a health insurance scheme • Percentage of employed persons whose families are covered by a health insurance scheme through the employed person‘s contribution to the scheme. • Should any other social protection indicators for other types of contingencies be covered in this sub-dimension? (e.g. disability, maternity, childcare or family care, employment injury, death?) ILO Department of Statistics

  12. Thank you for your attention Department of Statistics

More Related