1 / 37

JUAS MEETING 2005 EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE, Archamps, France

JUAS MEETING 2005 EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE, Archamps, France. SITE d’ARCHAMPS. We are here!. ANNUAL JUAS MEETING ESI, « Arrondine Room », 1st floor, Salève Building, Archamps, France. April 8, 2005 Agenda 10:00 Welcome (coffee break) ‏ 10:20 Report on JUAS 2005

shandi
Download Presentation

JUAS MEETING 2005 EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE, Archamps, France

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JUAS MEETING 2005EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE, Archamps, France

  2. SITE d’ARCHAMPS We are here!

  3. ANNUAL JUAS MEETINGESI, « Arrondine Room », 1st floor, Salève Building, Archamps,France • April 8, 2005 • Agenda • 10:00 Welcome (coffee break)‏ • 10:20 Report on JUAS 2005 • 12:00 Discussion and Preparation of JUAS 2006 • 13:00 Lunch • 14:30 ERASMUS Intensive Program • 15:30 Future prospects • 16:30 End of meeting

  4. NEW PARTNER UNIVERSITIES (since 2002) Technische Universität BerlinUniversità Degli Studi di GenovaUniversidad de Valencia TOTAL = 11 partner universities

  5. NEW SUPPORTING LABORATORIES • SINCE 2002 • CEA • Synchrotron SOLEIL • BERGOZ INSTRUMENTATION • IBA • BESSY II • SINCE 2003 • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Spain)‏ • SINCE 2005 • Erasmus activity financed by the Socrates Programme of the European Union

  6. POSTER 2005

  7. LECTURES, TUTORIALS, GUIDED STUDIES Course 1(hours) Course 2 (hours) L T GS L T GS JUAS 2001 55 11 24 58 8 20 JUAS 2002 55 11 24 58 8 20JUAS 2003 54 13 28 54 11 16JUAS 2004 54 13 22 57 11 16JUAS 2005 49 15 21 57 11 16

  8. CHANGES AMOUNG LECTURERS IN 2003 : G. Hoffstätter (DESY)  E. Gianfelice (DESY)L. Rinolfi (CERN)  R. Corsini (CERN)W. Pirkl (CERN)  F. Caspers (CERN)Ph. Lebrun (CERN)  L. Tavian (CERN)N. Pichoff (CEA)  A. Mueller (IPN – Orsay)P. Royer (CERN)  A. Ferrari (Uppsala University)J. Le Duff (IN2P3)  N. Pichoff (CEA)IN 2004 :K. Hubner (CERN)  R. Assmann (CERN)M. Martini (CERN)  N. Pichoff (CEA)N. Pichoff (CEA)  J. Le Duff (IN2P3)IN 2005 :F. Caspers (CERN)  W. Pirkl (CERN)A. Muller (IPN, Orsay)  S. Bousson (IPN, Orsay)‏ J. Le Duff (IN2P3)  A. Lombardi (CERN)‏

  9. PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS

  10. 38 PARTICIPANTS UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: 10examinations, credits, scholarship = accommodation Spain : 1 « Universidad de Valencia » 1 « Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya »Italy : 5 « Universita Roma La Sapienza »France : 2 « Joseph Fourrier  University »Germany : 1 Technische Universitat Darmstadt »EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRY STUDENTS: 10examinations, credits, scholarship : enrolment fees + accommodation + perdiem of 50 €/week for the Romanians.Iran : 4 « Sesame Project »Jordania : 1 « Sesame Project »Turkey: 1 « Sesame Project » 1 « Mayis University »Romania : 1 « University of Bucharest »Ukraine : 2 « Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technologies »

  11. PROFESSIONALS : 10 France : 2 « LPSC » 1 « LAL » 1 «  SOLEIL Project » Switzerland : 2 « CERN » Denmark : 1 « Aarhus University » Germany : 3 «  GSI – Technische Universitat Darmstadt »

  12. INDUSTRIALS : 8 Belgium : 6 « Ion Beam Application » South Africa : 2 « De Beers »

  13. EXAMINATION RESULTS ON « ACCELERATOR PHYSICS » (January 3 – February 4, 2005)‏ EXAMINATION course 1 A= Excellent (80-100) B= very good (70-80) C=good (60-70) D= Satisfactory (55-60) E= Sufficient (40-55) F= Failed (<40)‏

  14. EXAMINATION RESULTS ON « ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGIES » (February 7- March 12, 2005)‏ EXAMINATION course 2 A= Excellent (80-100) B= very good (70-80) C=good (60-70) D= Satisfactory (55-60) E= Sufficient (40-55) F= Failed (<40)‏

  15. Our students (Accelerator Physics course)‏

  16. SNOWING DAY

  17. AT BERGOZ

  18. TENTATIVE BUDGET

  19. POSTER 2006

  20. ANNEX TIMETABLES STATISTICS STUDENT IMPRESSIONS

  21. TIMETABLE WEEK 1

  22. TIMETABLE WEEK 2

  23. TIMETABLE WEEK 3

  24. TIMETABLE WEEK 4

  25. TIMETABLE WEEK 5

  26. TIMETABLE WEEK 6

  27. TIMETABLE WEEK 7

  28. TIMETABLE WEEK 8

  29. TIMETABLE WEEK 9

  30. TIMETABLE WEEK 10

  31. Course 1 : ACCELERATOR PHYSICS LECTURES

  32. Course 1 : ACCELERATOR PHYSICS TUTORIAL

  33. Course 2 : ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATION LECTURES

  34. Course 2 : ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS TUTORIAL

  35. 1. The location of the school A = 44% B = 44% C=12% « Easy to access with the highway » « A car is necessary for the shopping » « A little bit isolated and there is no supermarkets » « Archamps is very quiet » 2. Accommodation in the Grand Angle Residence « LOGITOP » A = 80% B = 20% « Large appartments, useful, underground car park is really good in winter » « No internet accesses» « Quick help if needed » 3. The school facilities (lecture hall, library, Internet access, Photocopying)‏ A = 65% B= 35% Library : « Taking from CERN library enough yellow books and giving them to us on the first day, so that we can study with them from beginning » Computer room : « We need new computers with USB ports and windows XP » « Internet access cumbersome with own laptop. Please install Wireless » 4. The Staff (availability, providing information/assistance)‏ 100% GOOD « Really interesting, lectures, lecturers hepful, they do not hesitate to take much time to explain difficult points » « The staff always tries to help us » « Simply perfect! » « Special thanks to Joël, Séverine & Fabienne to take onto account in every situation the needing and the request of the students » 5. Do you feel the school should propose and/or organise social activities for the students (bearing in mind the school’s limited resources and the different interests of participants)? What sort of activities? « The trip is a good idea but maybe not the weekend before the exams » « No, because there is a lot of works to do in a limited time. So the students should concentrate on the lectures and repeat them every day to understand basic concepts » « The existing activities were excellent » 6. Would you recommend JUAS in its present form to a fellow student/colleague? 100% YES « Yes, for 3 reasons : accelerator knowledges, improving of English and meeting people from all the world » « A very nice experience » « Very professionnal » 7. Any other comments Lectures : « It is very important in an intensive course like JUAS that lecturers respect the schedule » « The level of some professors is very high » « Subjects were all very interesting and most of the professors were very good » « The time for studying is not enough. Maybe a different collocation of the lessons during the day could help the student to find a more efficient rythm in learning advanced concepts » Examinations : « Maybe it is better to let see the corrections of exams to the students before printing out the certificates » Visits : « the organised visits to CERN, Bergoz and hospital were very interesting » STUDENT IMPRESSIONS

  36. ERASMUS IP2004

  37. ERASMUS IP2005

More Related