1 / 27

Do you see what I see?

Do you see what I see?. Gendered Differences in Interviewer Assessment. Systematic Assessments of Physical Space. Social scientist have taken an interest in how the physical ordering of space plays a role in social and economic development.

shanna
Download Presentation

Do you see what I see?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Do you see what I see? Gendered Differences in Interviewer Assessment

  2. Systematic Assessments of Physical Space. Social scientist have taken an interest in how the physical ordering of space plays a role in social and economic development. • (Raudenbush, Reiss and Sampson 1995; Sampson and Raudenbush 1999; Odgers et. al. 2012)

  3. Systematic Assessments of Physical Space. • The theoretical concerns for measuring physical space have remained relatively constant. • (Raudenbush, Reiss and Sampson 1995; Sampson and Raudenbush 1999; Odgers et. al. 2012)

  4. Systematic Assessments of Physical Space. • The methodsfor assessing physical space have varied. • (Raudenbush, Reiss and Sampson 1995; Sampson and Raudenbush 1999; Odgers et. al. 2012)

  5. Systematic Assessments of Physical Space. • Inter-rater reliability and measurement validity have been a consistent problemin assessing social and physical characteristics of space. • (See: Gordon et. al 2013; Armstrong et. al 1997) • (Raudenbush, Reiss and Sampson 1995; Sampson and Raudenbush 1999; Odgers et. al. 2012)

  6. Pilot Study. • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment.

  7. Pilot Study. • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. • Sample: • ~50 observations from ~20 Interviewers • (About 3 data points per Interviewer.)

  8. Pilot Study. • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. • Sample: • ~50 observations from ~20 Interviewers • (About 3 data points per Interviewer.) • Interviewers Demographics: • Mid-to-late 20’s; Upper-middle class; MA at a private mid-west University.

  9. Pilot Study. • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. • Sample: • ~50 observations from ~20 Interviewers • (About 3 data points per Interviewer.) • Interviewers Demographics: • Mid-to-late 20’s; Upper-middle class; MA at a private mid-west University. • Training and Calibration: • Rigorously trained twice a week for an hour and half by a well qualified faculty member; six weeks of training prior to going into the field.

  10. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Assessment of PhysicalSpace Interviewer

  11. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Assessment of PhysicalSpace Interviewer μ = 9.351

  12. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Assessment of PhysicalSpace Interviewer

  13. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Male Assessment of PhysicalSpace Female

  14. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Male +~.6795 Assessment of PhysicalSpace Female

  15. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male Assessment of PhysicalSpace Female

  16. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male Assessment of PhysicalSpace Mediator Female

  17. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male +~6.52 Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME + ~.0145 Female

  18. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male +~6.52 Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME Female

  19. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male Why? Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME Female

  20. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male Why? Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME Female (See: Low 2001)

  21. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male So What? Why? Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME Female (See: Low 2001) (See: Low 2001)

  22. Theory • Empirical Question: • Does gender have an effect on interviewer assessment. Interviewer Assessment of Physical Space Interviewer Characteristics Respondent Characteristics Male So What? Why? Assessment of PhysicalSpace INCOME Female (See: Low 2001) (See: Low 2001)

  23. Theory • Potential Solutions to Methodological Issue(s): Solutions given the Effect More selectivity in instrument to reduce heterogeneity.

  24. Theory • Potential Solutions to Methodological Issue(s): Solutions given the Effect More selectivity in instrument to reduce heterogeneity. More resources into training and inter-subjectivity development.

  25. Theory • Potential Solutions to Methodological Issue(s): Solutions given the Effect More selectivity in instrument to reduce heterogeneity. More resources into training and inter-subjectivity development. Mechanize the data collection and analysis process.

  26. Theory • Potential Solutions to Methodological Issue(s): Solutions given the Effect More selectivity in instrument to reduce heterogeneity. More resources into training and inter-subjectivity development. Mechanize the data collection and analysis process. Thanks.

  27. Method(s) • Created a gender indicator based on interviewer’s name. • Created a Physical Assessment Scale based on iaq1_1-iaq1_8. • Weighted Male response to represent population. (Men are under represented) • Regressed on the Physical Assessment Scale. • Slides and Code available: • Home.uchicago.edu/~/dgourdin/Do_You_See/

More Related