1 / 10

The student academic experience: how do we respond to the challenge?

Explore the findings of the 2014 Student Academic Experience Survey report and discover how universities are addressing the challenge of enhancing student satisfaction, value for money, and overall academic quality. This report highlights key statistics and strategies implemented to ensure a high-quality university experience.

shepard
Download Presentation

The student academic experience: how do we respond to the challenge?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The student academic experience: how do we respond to the challenge? Libby Hackett, Chief Executive University Alliance

  2. 2014 Student Academic Experience Survey report – some figures ​ 86% overall satisfaction rate 52.1%  36.3% value for money 48% would redirect investment into reducing fees

  3. What I’m going to say: responding to the challenge… ​ • Let’s hear from the students • Quality will keep rising up the agenda • Value for money

  4. Breadth and depth of university experience – more than just a degree

  5. How is quality currently secured? More safeguards than ever before Statutory protection “university” Key Information Sets Unistats Internal validation Subject benchmarks Framework of HE Qualifications UK Quality Code Collaborative approach Shared responsibility External examiners Internal student questionnaires National Student Survey League tables SLC funding in three instalments CUC Code of Practice QAA review every six years QAA themed reviews Student engagement PSRBs Internal complaints procedure OIA Cause for concern procedure European qualifications framework ​

  6. Change in numbers

  7. Managing quality in an expanding system: • Regulation Parity for all students • Managing risk Student success

  8. Value for money / Transparency • £9,000 fee • But a 45% RAB subsidy • 50:50 share of investment overall • £5,000 average graduate contribution ​

  9. Australia HEPI report: Clear water Uni_funding

  10. Thank you www.unialliance.ac.uk @unialliance libby@unialliance.ac.uk

More Related