1 / 28

CSCE 7 15 : Network Systems Security

CSCE 7 15 : Network Systems Security. Chin-Tser Huang huangct@cse.sc.edu University of South Carolina. Security in Network Layer. Implementing security in application layer provides flexibility in security policy and key management

shumphrey
Download Presentation

CSCE 7 15 : Network Systems Security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSCE 715:Network Systems Security Chin-Tser Huang huangct@cse.sc.edu University of South Carolina

  2. Security in Network Layer • Implementing security in application layer provides flexibility in security policy and key management • Problem is need to implement security mechanism in every application individually • To reduce the overhead, implement security in network layer to provide security for all applications between selected pair of computers

  3. IPSec • Two protocols • Authentication Header (AH) • Encasulating Security Payload (ESP) • Provide general security services for IP • Authentication • Confidentiality • Anti-replay • Key management • Applicable to use over LANs, across public and private WANs, and for the Internet

  4. Scenario of IPSec Uses

  5. Benefits of IPSec • Provide strong security to all traffic crossing the perimeter if installed in a firewall/router • Resistant to bypass • IPSec is below transport layer, hence transparent to applications • Can be transparent to end users • Can provide security for individual users if desired

  6. IP Security Architecture • Specification is quite complex • Defined in numerous RFC’s • RFC 2401/2402/2406/2408 • many others, grouped by category • Mandatory in IPv6, optional in IPv4

  7. Security Association (SA) • A unidirectional relationship between sender and receiver that affords security for traffic flow • Each IPSec computer maintains a database of SA’s • Defined by 3 parameters • Security Parameters Index (SPI) • IP Destination Address • Security Protocol Identifier

  8. SA Parameters • Sequence Number Counter • Sequence Number Overflow • Anti-Replay Window • AH and ESP information • Lifetime • IPSec Protocol Mode • Path MTU

  9. Authentication Header (AH) • Provide support for data integrity and authentication of IP packets • end system/router can authenticate user/app • prevent address spoofing attacks • guard against replay attacks by tracking sequence numbers • Based on use of a MAC • HMAC-MD5-96 or HMAC-SHA-1-96 • MAC is calculated over IP header fields that are either immutable or predictable, AH header other than authentication data, and entire upper-level protocol data • Parties must share a secret key

  10. Authentication Header

  11. End-to-End vs End-to-Intermediate Authentication

  12. Scope of AH Authentication

  13. Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) • Provide message content confidentiality and limited traffic flow confidentiality • Can optionally provide the same authentication services as AH • Support range of ciphers, modes, padding • DES, Triple-DES, RC5, IDEA, CAST etc • CBC most common • pad to meet blocksize, for traffic flow

  14. Encapsulating Security Payload

  15. Padding • Serve several purposes • expand the plaintext to required length • make Pad Length and Next Header fields aligned to 32-bit word boundary • conceal actual length of payload

  16. Transport vs Tunnel Mode ESP • Transport mode is used to encrypt and optionally authenticate IP data • data protected but header left in clear • can suffer from traffic analysis but is efficient • good for ESP host to host traffic • Tunnel mode encrypts entire IP packet • add new header for next hop • can counter traffic analysis • good for VPNs, gateway to gateway security

  17. Scope of ESP Encryption and Authentication

  18. Combining Security Associations • SAs can implement either AH or ESP, but each SA can implement only one • Some traffic flows may require services of both AH and ESP, while some other flows may require both transport and tunnel modes • To address these concerns, need to combine SAs to form a security association bundle • Have 4 basic cases

  19. Combining Security Associations

  20. Key Management • Handle key generation and distribution • Typically need 2 pairs of keys • 2 per direction for AH & ESP • Manual key management • sysadmin manually configures every system • Automated key management • automated system for on demand creation of keys for SA’s in large systems • Oakley and ISAKMP

  21. OAKLEY • A key exchange protocol • Based on Diffie-Hellman key exchange • Add features to address weaknesses of Diffie-Hellman • cookies to counter clogging attacks • nonces to counter replay attacks • key exchange authentication to counter man-in-the-middle attacks • Can use arithmetic in prime fields or elliptic curve fields

  22. Usage of Cookies • Three basic requirements • Must depend on specific parties • Impossible for anyone other than issuing entity to generate cookies that will be accepted by issuing entity • Cookie generation and verification must be fast • To create a cookie, perform a fast hash over src and dst IP addresses, src and dst ports, and a locally generated secret value

  23. ISAKMP • Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol • Provide framework for key management • Define procedures and packet formats to establish, negotiate, modify, and delete SAs • Independent of key exchange protocol, encryption algorithm, and authentication method

  24. ISAKMP Header

  25. ISAKMP Payload

  26. ISAKMP Exchange

  27. ISAKMP Exchange

  28. Next Class • Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack • Hop Integrity

More Related