1 / 29

Integrable Optics Test Accelerator Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab April 3 , 2013

Integrable Optics Test Accelerator Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab April 3 , 2013. Background and History. The Facility was motivated by the goal of building, testing and operating a complete ILC RF unit to:

siran
Download Presentation

Integrable Optics Test Accelerator Sergei Nagaitsev Fermilab April 3 , 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrable Optics Test AcceleratorSergei NagaitsevFermilabApril 3, 2013

  2. Background and History • The Facility was motivated by the goal of building, testing and operating a complete ILC RF unit to: • Develop and demonstrate industrial and laboratory capability for producing state-of-the-art SCL components, assemble into a fully functioning system (photo-injector, bunch compressor, three 1.3 GHz ILC CMs, beamlines to dumps) • To carry out full beam-based system tests with high-gradient cryomodules and demonstrate ILC beam quality • It was recognized early in the planning process that an electron beam meeting the ILC performance parameters was itself a power resource of interest to the wider Advanced Accelerator R&D (AARD) community • In 2006, Fermilab was asked to lead the US ILC/SRF R&D Program • we felt that the most effective way to do that was to learn by doing • Construction of Test Facility began in 2006 as part of ILC/SRF R&D and later American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  3. Background and History • In planning the construction we therefore wanted to ensure that the facility offered something of enduring value when it was completed. • Hence, the investment in establishing a flexible facility that would readily support an AARD user program. • For those reasons the ARRA-funded facility construction incorporated space for • additional ILC cryomodules to increase the beam energy to 1.5 GeV, • space for multiple high-energy beamlines, • space for a small circular ring for the exploration of advanced concepts, • capability of transporting laser light into and out of the accelerator enclosure, • an adequately-sized control room • To date, an investment of $74M has been made, including $18M of ARRA funding, representing ~80% completion of the facility • In June 2012, anticipating the completion of the ILC R&D Program, Fermilab was directed to prepare a proposal for the AARD program. • Proposal submitted to the DOE in Feb 2013 S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  4. http://apc.fnal.gov/programs2/ASTA_TEMP/index.shtml S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 Our Proposal

  5. We proposed to establish a proposal-driven Accelerator R&D User Facility at Fermilab’s Advanced Superconducting Test Accelerator (ASTA) To do that requires: • Supporting the completion of ASTA in a phased approach: • Build out the linear accelerator to ~800 MeV with three Cryomodules • associated beam transport lines, dumps and support systems • Construct the Integrable Optics Test Accelerator (IOTA) • A small, flexible storage ring to investigate beam dynamics of importance to intensity frontier rings • In further phases • Add proton capability to IOTA (by reusing existing HINS equipment) • Increase peak current of compressed electron bunches by installation of 3.9 GHz system • Supporting the Operation of an Accelerator R&D User Program • Support staff required to operate a 9 month/year proposal-driven Accelerator R&D program S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  6. Substantial Investments Have Already Been Made At ASTA Beam Dumps: $2M Magnets and Power Supplies: $4M RF Power Systems: $8M S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 Cryomodules: $15M Tunnel extension: $4.5M

  7. New Muon Lab – home of ASTA, CMTF – home of PXIE New Muon Lab CMTF S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  8. Facilities S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  9. ASTA : Schematically (at the end of Stage IV) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  10. ASTA : Upstream part 42‘ (13 m) 242‘ (74 m) Shows 3 SCRF CMs (1st CM – at Stage I.2, 2 more – Stage II) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  11. ASTA : Downstream part 76‘ (23 m) 230‘ (70 m) proton RFQ not pictured (Stage III) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  12. Experimental Areas 1 & 2 * 3.2nC × 3000 bunches × 5 Hz × 0.82 GeV = 40 kW S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  13. Experimental Area 3: IOTA S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  14. ASTA Science Thrusts S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  15. Intensity Frontier • Proposal: Experimental demonstration of integrable optics lattice at IOTA • FNAL, SNS, JINR, Budker INP, BNL, JAI, U. of Colorado, U. of Chicago • Proposal: Space Charge Compensation in High Intensity Circular Accelerators • FNAL, support from CERN, BNL • Experiments require the IOTA Ring • Difficult to implement needed linear optics in existing facilities • Lack of ring facilities in the US S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  16. A roadmap for high-intensity rings Being addressed now Addressed by ASTA • Increase dynamic aperture of rings with strong sextupoles and octupoles • Single particle dynamics • Also, addressed by the light-source community • Develop the theoretical basis of beam instabilities with strong space charge • Develop highly-nonlinear focusing lattices with reduced chaos • Reduce chaos in beam-beam effects • Ultimately, develop accelerators for super-high beam intensity • Self-consistent or compensated space-charge • Strong non-linearity (for Landau damping) to suppress instabilities • Stable particle motion at large amplitudes S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  17. Integrable Optics at IOTA S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 • Main goals for studies with a pencil electron beam: • Demonstrate a large tune spread of ~1 (with 4 lenses) without degradation of dynamic aperture ( minimum 0.25 ) • Quantify effects of a non-ideal lens and develop a practical lens (m- or e-lens)

  18. ASTA : Downstream part (now) IOTA S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 beam dump

  19. Integrable Optics: Motivation • Stability depends on initial conditions • Regular trajectories for small amplitudes • Resonant islands (for larger amplitudes) • Chaos and loss of stability (for large amplitudes) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 • The main feature of all present accelerators – linear focusing lattice: particles have nearly identical betatron frequencies (tunes) by design. • Hamiltonian has explicit time dependence • All nonlinearities (both magnet imperfections and specially introduced) are perturbations and make single particle motion unstable (non-integrable) due to resonant conditions

  20. Does Focusing Need to be Linear? S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 • Are there “magic” nonlinearities with zero resonance strength? • The answer is – yes (we call them “integrable”) • Search for a lattice design that is strongly nonlinear yet stable • Orlov (1963) -- attempt failed (non-integrable) • McMillan (1967) – first successfull 1-D example • Perevedentsev, Danilov (1990 - 1995) – several 1D, 2D examples • Cary and colleagues (1994) – approximate integrability • Our goal (with IOTA) is to create practical nonlinear accelerator focusing systems with a large frequency spread and stable particle motion. • Danilov, Nagaitsev, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 084002 (2010)

  21. Nonlinear Lenses S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 • “Integrable Optics” solutions: • Make motion regular, limited and long-term stable (usually involves additional “integrals of motion”) • Can be Laplacian (with special magnets, no extra charge density involved) • Or non-Laplacian (with externally created charge –e.g. special e-lens or beam-beam E(r) ~r/(1+r^2) • Both types will be tested in IOTA

  22. Concept: 2-m long nonlinear magnet S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  23. A single nonlinear lens FMA, fractional tunes 1.0 Large amplitudes νy Small amplitudes (0.91, 0.59) 0.5 0.5 νx 1.0 S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013 A single 2-m long nonlinear lens creates a tune spread of ~0.25.

  24. Space Charge Effects in Linear Optics Lattice dQ_sc ~ 0.7 Tech-X simulations System: linear FOFO; 100 A; linear KV w/ mismatch Result: quickly drives test-particles into the halo 500 passes; beam core (red contours) is mismatched; halo (blue dots) has 100x lower density S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  25. Integrable Optics Lattice with Space Charge dQ_sc ~ 0.7 Tech-X simulations System: octupoles; 100 A; generalized KV w/ mismatch Result: nonlinear decoherence suppresses halo 500 passes; beam core (red contours) is mismatched; halo (blue dots) has 100x lower density S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  26. Space Charge Compensation Bringing Protons to IOTA 2.5 MeV RFQ HINS • Allows tests of Integrable Optics with protons and realistic Space-Charge beam dynamics studies • Allows Space-charge compensation experiments S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  27. Space Charge Forces & Compensation Z, beam direction B=E r, across the beam S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  28. Space-Charge Compensation in Circular Accelerators Goal: Experimental demonstration of the space-charge compensation technique with electron columns/electron lenses at dQ_sc >1 Why ASTA: Need 2.5 MeV high-current protons and IOTA – flexible lattice storage ring Relevant accelerators: All current and future high intensity proton rings (Booster, MI, all LHC injectors, MC rings, etc) S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

  29. Summary • ASTA offers: • A broad range in beam energies (50-800 MeV) • High-repetition rate and the highest power beams available • High beam quality and beam stability • The brightest beams available • Advanced phase-space manipulations (FB, EEX) • Linacs and ring (IOTA), electrons and protons, lasers • IOTAscientific goals are well aligned with Fermilabgoals and investments in Intensity and Energy Frontiers • ASTA is a great opportunity for collaboration, for post-docs and graduate students S. Nagaitsev, PASI 2nd annual meeting, Apr. 3-5, 2013

More Related