1 / 9

JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process

JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process. Phase 1: reaclib based rp-process database. Project carried out by dedicated JINA research associate: Alexander Sakharuk. Database Contents:. reaction rates in fitted reaclib format including SEF SEF real data points to judge fit

sirois
Download Presentation

JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process Phase 1: reaclib based rp-process database Project carried out by dedicated JINA research associate: Alexander Sakharuk Database Contents: • reaction rates in fitted reaclib format including SEF • SEF • real data points to judge fit • multiple versions, one recommended • sources • community comments (discussion threads)

  2. JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process Activity path: • update reaclib using (done) • theoretical calculations with updated masses • existing compilations (NACRE, Iliadis et al. 2002) • individual work judged “uncontroversial” with some cutoff date • Publish and make first release publicly available (coming soon) • Create a continuous and transparent update path (in the works) • Prejudge new data and sort into categories:(currently done by Michael and Hendrik) • Not yet prejudged but found in literature • Difficult/controversial  to be evaluated later • Clear case: to be implemented into reaclib • Fitted and available, but not in new release • Continuously work on these categories as man power allows • Gather input from community (discussion threads etc) • Figure out next steps (together with community): • Develop guidelines, procedure and identify man power for evaluations(rely on independent community efforts such as NACRE) • Enhance database: other fit formats, error bars, ….. • Imbed into other “Meta” efforts: NNDC, nucastrodata.org, …

  3. JINA Reaction Rate Library & Database STEP1: rp-process • Reaclib database will be available through WWW interface • Some Features: • Release of recommended libraries at certain times • Users can download these in reaclib format, or they can create own libraries and download those • Own libraries can be created using web interface or with “control files” that can be edited by the user and be uploaded • All libraries are documented in the database – public can lookup contents of any library for which name has been published • Continuous updates • Discussion threads for each rate

  4. http://www.nscl.msu.edu/~nero/db/

  5. JINA online journal for nuclear astrophysics data JINA Online Journal for Nuclear Data - Vision • Data Users (modelers, experimentalists) • retrieve version tracked groups of data • read comments, make choices • reference data in their work (Onl. Jour. Nucl. Astr. Dat 002334-05) JINA Web-Database Updated continuously Data(refereed) Comments/Data(not refereed, open) • Editorial Board • Identifies evaluation needs • Requests/collects evaluations from referees • Reviews evaluations before they enter database • Edits comments section if necessary • Scientific Community • Comment on data in database • Contribute new data • lookup data used in published work • (identified through libraries) Referee Pool • volunteers • open to everybody • flexible workload distribution • get publication credit Manual for data evaluation Individuals Evaluating groups

  6. JINA online journal for nuclear astrophysics data Future • Plus side: • individual initiatives – one important piece • there seem to be ways to establish the technical infrastructure needed • there might be ways to fund some personnel to process, and work on technical side of updates JINA position open ! Key problem: Updating and evaluating

  7. JINA online journal for nuclear astrophysics data Future • Updating: CAN BE DONE BY FEW PEOPLE + COMMITTEE/EDITORIAL BOARD • search literature • categorize (expert group ?) and make results public contineously • At least one knows what is in the pipeline where • Easy things can be done (JINA person, or might motivate others) • List of hard things that can be dealt with for evaluation • Evaluating: HOW TO GET EXPERTS TO DO IT ? • make it easy (tools) • manual (standardize and facilitates) – can we develop this ? • but in the end people need to be motivated ! • “committee” could look at rates regularly and decide that updates are needed • “committee” could ask referees to do a specific rate Final question: credit for nuclear experimentalists ???

  8. JINA online journal for nuclear astrophysics data Future How to go from here ? What are the next steps ? How to get this done ? Form a data working group ?

  9. Conclusions/Suggestions • form a working group; focus on rates initially but look at other things • have a user representative • credit for evaluators: regular publication (discussing changes) and evaluators as authors plus individual papers • credit for experimentalists: provide reference lists, encourage astrophysicists to use these at least for important rates • going beyond rates. Needed: • JINA abundances • Beta decay rates: evaluation, database; include in current effort lots of new data coming • Fission: collect exp data in one place and make theoretical compilations available • EOS data needed to use and evaluate should be accessible through one web site; agree on one reference EOS • EC, neutrino data available through one website • masses: make AME/theory masses available on one site

More Related