1 / 30

Principles and Strategies of Quantitative Data Analysis

Principles and Strategies of Quantitative Data Analysis. SLC515 Research Methods for Socio-Legal Studies and Criminology 2007/2008. Outline. Foundation of QR: Positivism Validity and reliability in QR Core issues of concern in QR Critique of QR. Outline.

spencer
Download Presentation

Principles and Strategies of Quantitative Data Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principles and Strategies of Quantitative Data Analysis SLC515 Research Methods for Socio-Legal Studies and Criminology 2007/2008

  2. Outline • Foundation of QR: Positivism • Validity and reliability in QR • Core issues of concern in QR • Critique of QR

  3. Outline • Descriptive and inferential statistics • Inferential Statistics • Crosstabs • Correlation • Regression

  4. Positivism - Historical Facts • 16/17th century: blooming of European thought • Beginning of modern science • Auguste Comte (1798-1857): • Sociology as the “queen” of social sciences • “Social physics”; idea of progress, social science works like natural science • Precise and certain methods, basing theoretical laws on sound empirical observation • Knowledge is derived from empirical evidence • 19th century: natural sciences gain influence  impacts thinking in social science

  5. Positivism - Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) • Human and material phenomena are equally real but human phenomena cannot be reduced to pure material facts. • Social facts - society as a moral reality, expressed in institutions such as law, religion etc. which are external to us and constrain us. • Sociologists should describe characteristics of facts and explain how they came into being. • Explanation of social facts by causes: single cause  effect, law-like relationship • Same general methods of scientific inquiry can be used.

  6. Positivism - Key Elements • Social research as ‘science’ • Universal laws - testing theories • Cause and effect relationships between variables • Solid methods • Value neutral • Objectivity

  7. Science is … Adapted from Sarantakos (1993) Table 2.2, page 38.

  8. Purpose of research … Adapted from Sarantakos (1993) Table 2.2, page 38 & 39.

  9. Theories, Hypotheses and Research Design • Deductive approach • Theory testing • Derive hypotheses from theory (if… then… sentences) and test them • Research design: • Cross-sectional survey • Longitudinal design • Case study design • Comparative design

  10. Operationalisation • Translation of a theoretical concept into something that can be measured • Example (natural sciences): temperature - degrees Celsius, velocity - km/h • How do you measure the frustration caused by unemployment or the level of alienation in a society or a society’s satisfaction with its government? • Operational definition through indicators

  11. Indicators • Difference between a measure and an indicator (quantities versus complex concepts) • An indicator is employed as though it were a measure of a concept. • Example: job satisfaction

  12. Research Sites and Subjects • Depending on research design, methods and sources of data • Establish an appropriate setting: • Decisions are involved: where? and who? • Sampling strategies • Probability and non-probability sampling • Representative sample - generalizability

  13. Collecting and Processing Data • Depends on the chosen research design: • Experiments: pre- and post-testing • Survey interviews: questionnaire and interviews • Etc. • Gathered information is then transformed into ‘data’ • Information will be quantified - coding - to be processed by a computer

  14. Analysing Data and Research Findings • Statistical techniques/analysis, special software • Results/findings have to be interpreted based on theoretical reflections in the beginning (verification/falsification of hypotheses) • Objectives of QR: • Support or reject theoretical concepts or findings of other studies • Detecting trends, patterns • Uncover common sense knowledge • Building typologies

  15. Writing up Findings and Conclusion • Results enter the public domain • Conference paper, article, report, thesis, book • Significance and validity of findings • Implications? (policy advice etc.) • Presentation of quantitative data is different than in qualitative research

  16. Validity and Reliability • Validity, reliability and generalizability are measures of the quality, rigour and wider potential of research • Validity = are you observing what you want to observe (construct validity) • Is your set of indicators really measuring what you want to measure? • Reliability = are the measures, devised for the concept, concise (stability of measure) • Stability over time, consistency of indicators (internal reliability) and observers (inter-observer consistency)

  17. Core Issues of Concern in QR • Measurement • Causality - Explanation (dependent and independent variable) • Generalisation (representative sample) • Replication • Testing theory

  18. Critique of QR • Positivism vs. interpretive social sciences • Objectivity? • Generalization - but too simplistic? • Causality

  19. Quantitative Numbers Researcher’s view Researcher distant Theory testing Static Structured Generalization Hard, reliable data Macro Behaviour Artificial setting Qualitative Words/Text Participant’s view Researcher close Theory emergent Process Unstructured Contextual Rich, deep data Micro Meaning Natural setting Contrasting Qualitative and Quantitative Research

  20. Descriptive and Inferential Statistics • Univariate • Descriptive analysis of one variable (column in data set) • Bivariate • Relationship between two variables • Dependent and independent variables • Relation between dependent and independent variables • Differences between dependent and independent variables

  21. Bivariate Analysis • Questions we can ask: • Is the relationship significant? • If so, how strong is the relationship? • In which direction does the relationship go? • Positive relationships • Negative relationships • Some statistical tests: • Crosstabulation • Correlation • Regression analysis

  22. Cross Tabs • All levels of measurement are allowed • Cross tabs express common frequencies of the categories of two different variables • Significance test: CHI Square • How strong?: lambda, gamma, r2 • Which direction?: gamma, tau

  23. Example

  24. Example

  25. Correlation • Correlations measure statistical associations, but do not allow any inferences about causal patterns • Requirement: • Ordinal and interval data • Normally distributed and linear relation • Coefficient: • Pearson’s r (interval data) • Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ordinal data)

  26. Example

  27. Regression Analysis • You can visualize correlation in a scatter diagram • Regression line • Regression coefficients • Formula: y=a+b(x) • Requirements: • Interval data • Normally distributed • Linear relationship

  28. Example

  29. Controlling for Variables • Purpose of controlling for variables: e.g. exploration of variables that intervene in the relationship between other variables • Example: examination of the relationship between GDP and literacy rates in different regions of the world • Independent variable: GDP • Dependent variable: literacy • Control variable: regions

  30. Example • Pearson’s r was used to measure the correlation between GDP and literacy rates in three regions of the world • OECD countries r=0.616 • Latin America r=0.608 • Africa r=0.421 Conclusion: The strength of the association between GDP and literacy rates varies between different regions. In some, GDP is a better predictor of literacy rates than in others.

More Related