1 / 34

Ian Clifford – British Council Burma

Beyond the polarisation of learner-centred and teacher-centred pedagogy. Ian Clifford – British Council Burma. Outline Child-centred and teacher-centred approaches – history and definitions Evidence on CCA and ‘direct instruction’ in Western contexts

sronnie
Download Presentation

Ian Clifford – British Council Burma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond the polarisation of learner-centred and teacher-centred pedagogy • Ian Clifford – British Council Burma

  2. Outline • Child-centred and teacher-centred approaches – history and definitions • Evidence on CCA and ‘direct instruction’ in Western contexts • The challenge of implementing CCA in southern contexts • Failure of CCA in Myanmar • The English for Education College Trainers (EfECT) project • Towards a more balanced approach

  3. “Learner-centred approaches” - 1 • Learner-centred education (LCE) / Student-centred approach / Child-centred approach (CCA) • History of CCA • Locke (1632-1704) – liberal education • Rousseau (1712-1778) centrality of learner, teachers intervene minimally in “natural development of children” • Pestalozzi (1746-1827) • Froebel (1782-1852) kindergarten

  4. “Learner-centred approaches” - 2 • Competency (Bernstein) • “Terms such as ‘constructivism’ or ‘student-centred’ … obscure rather than clarify … details of practices … not given … assumptions already known.” Westbrook et al, 2013 • Approaches associated with minimal instruction (discovery / problem-based / inquiry / experiential learning)

  5. LCE, CCA = Constructivism? - 1 ? What is learning?

  6. LCE, CCA = Constructivism? - 2 • Piaget (1896-1980) – Cognitive constructivism • Vygotsky (1896-1934) – social constructivism • Learners construct knowledge – linking new knowledge to existing knowledge • But constructivism is a theory of learning and knowledge acquisition, not a theory of teaching

  7. “Teacher-centred” approaches • Negative connotations: • Hierarchical, • authoritarian, • transmission, • memorisation • rote learning • Performance (Bernstein) • Banking education (Freire)

  8. Direct Instruction 1 • interactive whole class teaching • Teacher being actively engaged in bringing the content of the lesson to the whole class (Muijs and Reynolds, 2011)

  9. Direct instruction - 2 • 7 steps - Adams and Engelmann (1996) • Focus activity (‘the hook’) • Stating the objective and providing the rationale • Presenting content and modelling • Checking for understanding; • Guided practice • Independent practice • Closure

  10. A word on EFL teaching • The British Council often styles its best practice EFL teaching as “learner-centred” • … and it’s difficult to teach a language without peer-to-peer communicative practice • However, EFL teaching is often very teacher-directed and quite closely follows the stages of “direct instruction”

  11. Some evidence - 1 • Rosenshine (1979) – stronger pupil gains when teachers spend more time actively teaching the whole class • Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Study teachers given training around in direct instruction – more pupil gains in standardised tests (Good and Grouws, 1979) • ORACLE project - teachers labelled ‘class enquirers’ spent four times longer using whole-class interactive teaching than ‘individual monitors’ and generated the greatest gains in maths and language (Croll, 1996; Galton and Croll, 1980) • Junior School Project – 50 primary schools – significant positive relationship time spent communicating with the whole class and achievement (Mortimore et al, 1988)

  12. Evidence - 2 • John Hattie (2009) • 500 meta-analyses of 300,000 studies direct instruction effect size of 0.59 • ‘teacher as activator’ approaches significantly more effective than ‘teacher as facilitator’ approaches

  13. “There is no large-scale empirical research which shows that child-centered, activity-based learning is superior to direct instruction in the teaching of basic skills… all the large-scale studies show direct instruction is superior” (Freedman, Society for Advancing Educational Research, SAER, 1993, p. 22).

  14. … and not just tests of basic skills • Follow-through project • 70,000 pupils from 180 schools – largest education study in the West ever • Direct instruction approaches showed better performance better in basic skills but also cognitive and affective skills Gautier, Dembele2004

  15. “Why discovery learning does not work”- Kirschner et al, 2006 • Two assumptions • Because disciplines are based on discovery students should learn through discovery • Because students actively construct knowledge teachers should give minimal instruction

  16. “Why discovery learning does not work”- Kirschner et al, 2006

  17. Long-term memory “Why discovery learning does not work”- Kirschner et al, 2006 Working memory

  18. Long-term memory “Why discovery learning does not work”- Kirschner et al, 2006 Working memory

  19. Problem-serving approaches – can lead to working memory overload – this inhibits storage into long-term memory • Kirschner et al • “research evidence broadly favours direct instruction rather than discovery learning” • - Coe et al, 2014, • Sutton Trust, “What makes great teaching” • Long-term memory Working memory

  20. Failure to implement LCE in south - 1 Schweisfurth, 2011: • “Review of 72 studies exploring the issues and problems of implementing LCE programmes in particular settings” • “the history of the implementation of LCE in different contexts is riddled with stories of failures grand and small.” • Four broad explanations:

  21. Failure to implement LCE in south - 2 • Problems with the nature of reform and its implementation: Expectations of education reform are too high and the speed of expected change too rapid. Often education reform is expected to address a wide range of other issues from democratisation to elitism - Schweisfurth, 2011

  22. Failure to implement LCE in south - 3 2. Barriers of material and human resources: Practical, material and resource constraints- infrastructure, class size, teaching materials and teacher capacity. - Schweisfurth, 2011

  23. Failure to implement LCE in south - 4 3. Interactions of divergent cultures – “high power distance”, “collectivist” cultures (Hofstede). Roles of teachers and students – teachers expected to be in control – students expected to be obedient. - Schweisfurth, 2011

  24. Failure to implement LCE in south - 5 4. Questions of power and agency – lack joined up reform of curriculum, infrastructure, teacher education and particularly, examination and assessment systems - Schweisfurth, 2011

  25. The failure of CCA in Myanmar • 2007-2014 - JICA – Strengthening CCA (SCCA) project – “little positive change” • 2006-2014 UNICEF – Child-friendly schools / Quality Basic Education – “limited impact”

  26. Learner-centred vs. teacher-centred? • Need to reject polarisation: learner-centred vs. teacher-centred (Barrett, 2007), • Need to build on and broaden repertoire of traditional whole class teaching (Hardman et al, 2012) • The bestSouthern teachers use “both student- and teacher-centred practices … integrating newer pedagogies with more traditional ones… performance model … informed by a competence model”. (Westbrook et al, 2013)

  27. English for Education College Trainers (EfECT) • Signing of MoU between British Council and Myanmar MoE • Followed state visit by president Thein Sein to UK • £4.5 million project – DFID and British Council • 46 expatriate trainers in 24 Myanmar training institutions • 1,500 – 2,000 teacher educator beneficiaries • 1 year improving English, 1 year improving teaching methodology

  28. Myanmar Pedagogy • Transmission model • Recipe knowledge for recall • Closed questioning • Teacher feedback rare • Pupils have limited opportunity to ask questions or offer opinions • Limited development of critical thinking • School buildings lack investment • Classrooms hot, crowded and noisy - Hardman et al, UNICEF, 2010

  29. EfECT Needs Analysis Structured observations of teacher educators • rote learning, drilling, chanting, reading aloud, memorisation • choral response to questions • lack of confidence in using a range of methodologies • Little evidence of staging, or checking understanding

  30. Reasons for not using child-centred approaches • Time • The exam system • Class sizes • Classroom layout • Student attitude and motivation • Lack of training • Perception of other teachers

  31. EfECT approach to methodology • 6 months – interactive whole-class teaching • 6 months - peer-to-peer learning, creativity, critical thinking • Course aimed at A2 CEF level • Structured lesson observations at year start, mid-point and end • Using observation instrument focussed on small incremental changes

  32. Approach to methodology year First 6 months Direct instruction focus Introductory module Effective direct instruction / whole class teaching Questioning skills Classroom management Second 6 months ‘Learner centred’ focus Effective interactive teaching Planning and preparation Assessment Critical thinking

  33. Changes … • Planning – clear learning outcomes and logical, coherent staging. • Assessment – learning outcomes assessed throughout the lesson • Questioning – engaging, checking, responding, wait time. • Interactive classroom management and feedback • Resources – effective, motivating adaptation • Reflective practice – strengths and areas for improvement

  34. Minimum Standards for LCE(Schweisfurth, 2013)

More Related