1 / 70

MIND MAPPING FUNCTIONS FOR MANAGING INFORMATION, RECORDS AND ARCHIVES

45 th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 May 2019. MIND MAPPING FUNCTIONS FOR MANAGING INFORMATION, RECORDS AND ARCHIVES. Giovanni Michetti Sapienza University of Rome. Stephen Haufek United Nations. In collaboration with Eng Sengsavang (UNESCO) Jens Boel ( former UNESCO). AGENDA.

sshawn
Download Presentation

MIND MAPPING FUNCTIONS FOR MANAGING INFORMATION, RECORDS AND ARCHIVES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 May 2019 MIND MAPPING FUNCTIONS FOR MANAGING INFORMATION, RECORDS AND ARCHIVES Giovanni Michetti Sapienza University of Rome Stephen Haufek United Nations In collaboration with EngSengsavang(UNESCO) Jens Boel(former UNESCO)

  2. AGENDA Ontology Mind Map Survey 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  3. ONTOLOGY: THE SOURCES • ARMA International. Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles. 2014 • Society of American Archivists. Core Archival Functions. 2016 • ISO 14641−1:2012 Electronic archiving—Part 1: Specifications concerning the design and the operation of an information system for electronic information preservation • ISO 14721:2012 Space Data and Information Transfer Systems—Open Archival Information System (OAIS)—Reference Model • ISO 15489−1:2016 Information and documentation—Records management—Part 1: Concepts and principles • ISO/TR 15489−2:2001 Information and documentation—Records management—Part 2: Guidelines • ISO/TR 15801:2017 Document management—Electronically stored information—Recommendations for trustworthiness and reliability • ISO 16175−1:2010 Information and documentation—Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments—Part 1: Overview and statement of principles • ISO 16175−2:2011 Information and documentation—Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments—Part 2: Guidelines and functional requirements for digital records management systems • ISO 16175−3:2010 Information and documentation—Principles and functional requirements for records in electronic office environments—Part 3: Guidelines and functional requirements for records in business systems • ISO 16363:2012 Space data and information transfer systems—Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories • ISO 23081−1:2017 Information and documentation—Records management processes—Metadata for records—Part 1: Principles • ISO 23081−2:2009 Information and documentation—Managing metadata for records—Metadata for records—Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues • ISO/TR 26122:2008 Information and documentation—Work process analysis for records • ISO/IEC 27000:2016 Information technology—Security techniques—Information security management systems—Overview and vocabulary • ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology—Security techniques—Information security management systems—Requirements • ISO/IEC 27002:2013 Information technology—Security techniques—Code of practice for information security controls • ISO 30300:2011 Information and documentation—Management systems for records—Fundamentals and vocabulary • ISO 30301:2011 Information and documentation—Management systems for records—Requirements • ISO 30302:2015 Information and documentation—Management systems for records—Guidelines for implementation 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  4. ONTOLOGY: ANALIZING THE SOURCES ISO 15489-1 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  5. ONTOLOGY: ANALIZING THE SOURCES Information can be managed asrecord Record is evidence ofbusiness activity Record is information asset RM encompasses creating records RM encompasses capturing records RM encompassesprotecting authenticity, reliability, … Metadata isdata describing context, content and structure of records Metadata isdata describing the management of records RM is supported by records systems Metadata is an essential component of record 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  6. ONTOLOGY: ANALIZING THE SOURCES 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  7. ONTOLOGY OF FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIESFOR ARCHIVAL SYSTEMS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  8. ONTOLOGY OF FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIESFOR ARCHIVAL SYSTEMS A = ISO 15489-1 B = GARP C = ISO 23081-2 D = ISO 16175-1 E = CAF F = OAIS G = ISO 30300 H = ISO 30301 I = ISO 30302 J = ISO 16175-3 K = ISO 16175-2 L = ISO 15489-2 M = ISO 23081-1 N = ISO 16363 O = ISO 14641-1 P = ISO 26122 Q = ISO 15801 R = ISO 27000 S = ISO 27001 T = ISO 27002 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  9. ONTOLOGY OF FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIESFOR ARCHIVAL SYSTEMS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  10. Mind Map 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  11. INFORMATION, RECORDS, AND ARCHIVES MANAGEMENT:MIND MAP 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  12. Survey 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  13. QUESTIONNAIRE Integrated/Comprehensive Approaches to Information, Records & Archives Management • The purpose of this survey is to assess how information, records and archives management are integrated within organisations. It has been developed specifically with information professionals from International Organisations (IOs) in mind (primarily records managers and archivists), although it may be completed by others. The intention of the survey is to gauge the extent to which key functions that are identified in international standards on information, records and archives management are actually present in IOs. Furthermore, the survey will allow us to assess the degree to which information, records and archives management functions are integrated with each other; whether there are tools, policies, and/or frameworks that support their integration; and which organisational units are responsible for specific functions. This information can, on the one hand, inform the development of future standards by identifying possible gaps in them, and on the other hand, inform the development of information, records and archives management capacity in IOs by identifying organisational gaps. • The results of the survey will be used for scholarly purposes and may inform the development of a chapter within a publication on recordkeeping in IOs (forthcoming from Routledge in 2020). The functional areas identified in the survey are based on the Ontology of Functional Activities for Archival Systems, developed by Giovanni Michetti and Georg Gänser for InterPARES Trust. • The survey should take about 20 minutes, depending on the level of description you wish to include in the text fields. • Consent and Confidentiality Statement: Your participation in this survey is entirely voluntary. If you decide to participate, you may withdraw at any time. You will not be penalized if you decide not to participate or if you withdraw at any time. Your information will be kept confidential. The survey will not contain information that will personally identify you, and any use of the survey data will be anonymized. If you have questions about the research study, please contact: Stephen Haufek (haufek@un.org) and Giovanni Michetti (giovanni.michetti@uniroma1.it). 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  14. 1. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS • If you are affiliated to an International Organization, please click on the following link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfrWieMOSmmtc7CVFAVFORZBfO-TdF-cs3z61KKW-amJ2TsdA/viewform • Otherwise, click on the button below to proceed in the survey 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  15. 2. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED Please provide your view on the following statement: • Information, records, and archives management should be considered as components of one integrated programme or system • Is there an information governance framework that includes records and archives management in your organisation? • Is there a system (or integrated systems) that manage the information lifecycle from creation through disposition, including the management of records and archives in accordance with best practice (e.g. application of retention schedules, access to records under organisational policy, arrangement and description of archives, digital preservation) in your organisation? • Is accountability for information, records, and archives management integrated into one organisational unit – e.g. Archives and Records Management Section or under the Chief of Information and Communications Technology? • Is the capacity for these functions within your organisation sufficient? • Please share your views on the interrelationship between information management, records management, and archives management 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  16. 3. COMPREHENSIVE • On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent are these functions addressed by separate organisational units? • On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent does each function need to be improved within your organisation? • Do you think that the functions depicted in the diagram address all the areas that need to be covered within a comprehensive information, records, and archives management ecosystem? • If no, which further areas need to be addressed? • On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent is each function in the diagram addressed in your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  17. 4. TOOLS • Do you think that the tools for managing your organization’s data should be integrated in what could be described as a global content management ecosystem? • If yes, please explain how far your organization has come towards achieving this objective • If no, please explain why using specialized tools that are not integrated is preferable 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  18. 5. STANDARDS • Do international standards help you carry out your activities in the fields of information, records, and/or archives management? • If yes, please identify which standard(s) you refer to and explain how they are useful from an operational and/or policy perspective. • Do you think that an international, high-level standard, designing an integrated and comprehensive information, records and archives management system would be useful? • If yes, please explain how in relation to your organization 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  19. 6. EFFECTIVENESS • On a scale from 1 to 10 how would you rate the effectiveness of your organization’s approach to information, records and archives management on the implementation of its mandate? • Please describe how the improvement of any functional areas in the field of information, records and/or archives management, would increase the delivery of your organization’s mandate. 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  20. RESPONSES • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  21. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  22. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  23. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  24. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  25. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  26. [IOs] INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED Please share your views on the interrelationship between information management, records management, and archives management: • An overall view and integration of data, information and records / archives management should be beneficial • Integration is crucial within the digital records world • RM&A functions under one team, library and knowledge management functions under separate teams • They should be under one single umbrella • This interrelation is absolutely needed due to the shift from paper to digital and the integrated management of digital information throughout its entire lifecycle • Information management is a whole that encompasses both document management and communication and other information services as IT, in which the RMA is a subgroup managing what is essential to the organization to hold in a sustainable and controlled way • Very interrelated, but difficult to practically bring together • It all should be integrated and functions/works as one • IM is a very broad umbrella covering RM and Archives, as well as many other responsibilities and activities such as library collections management, data management, document management, etc. 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  27. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  28. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  29. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent is each function in the diagram addressed in your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  30. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent is each function in the diagram addressed in your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  31. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent is each function in the diagram addressed in your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  32. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent are the functions addressed by separate organisational units? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  33. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent does each function need to be improved within your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  34. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent does each function need to be improved within your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  35. [IOs] COMPREHENSIVE On a scale from 1 to 10 to what extent does each function need to be improved within your organisation? 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  36. [IOs] TOOLS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  37. [IOs] TOOLS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  38. [IOs] TOOLS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  39. [IOs] STANDARDS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  40. [IOs] STANDARDS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  41. [IOs] STANDARDS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  42. [IOs] STANDARDS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  43. [IOs] EFFECTIVENESS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  44. [IOs] EFFECTIVENESS 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  45. RESPONSES • GENERAL 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  46. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  47. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  48. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  49. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

  50. INTEGRATED VS SPECIALIZED 45th SIO Meeting, Bruxelles, 21 may 2019 (Haufek & Michetti)

More Related