BA1

1. Example: Resource 3 pseudo tie-lined into BA1 TSP4 RC4 TSP1 TSP2 TSP3 RC1 RC2 RC3 Flowgate 4 BA4 BA3 BA1 BA2 Flowgate 3 Flowgate 2 Flowgate 1 TSR1 TSR2 TSR3 BA1 Path of the flow on Transmission System LSE1 3 PSE3 • High level principle: • Impact of the transfer from Resource 3 (PSE3) to load of BA1 (LSE1) is included in GTL of BA1 • Resource 3 has priority of TSR3 in case of TLR on Flow gate 3 (assume Firm) • Resource 3 has priority of TSR2 in case of TLR on Flow gate 2 (assume Firm) • Resource 3 has priority of TSR1 in case of TLR on Flow gate 1 (assume NN6) • In case of TLR on flow gate 4, PFV need to select lowest priority of TSR1, TSR2, TSR3 • LSE1 or PSE3 (or TSP1) is responsible to submit priorities for Resource 3. • Priority, capacity and TSR1 number(s) for flow gates of TSP1 (to be confirmed/acknowledged in PFV by LSE1, TSP1, PSE3) • Priority, capacity and TSR2 number(s) for flow gates of TSP2 (to be confirmed/acknowledged in PFV by LSE1, TSP2, PSE3) • Priority, capacity and TSR3 number(s) for flow gates of TSP3 (to be confirmed/acknowledged in PFV by LSE1, TSP3, PSE3) • PFV can select the entered priority depending on the flow gate for which TLR is issued • LSE1 and PSE3 are responsible to inform TSP1 of any changes to capacity of TSR1 or approval of new TSRs • LSE1 and PSE3 are responsible to inform TSP1 of any changes to capacity of TSR2 or approval of new TSRs • LSE1 and PSE3 is responsible to inform TSP1 of any changes to capacity of TSR3 or approval of new TSRs