1 / 18

Conflict and HIV: A Framework for Risk Assessment to Prevent HIV in Conflict Settings

Conflict and HIV: A Framework for Risk Assessment to Prevent HIV in Conflict Settings. International Studies Association March 26, 2002 New Orleans, La. 700112 Nancy Mock, Dr. P.H. and Ellen Mathys, M.P.H. Tulane University. Conflict and HIV:Background.

Download Presentation

Conflict and HIV: A Framework for Risk Assessment to Prevent HIV in Conflict Settings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conflict and HIV: A Framework for Risk Assessment to Prevent HIV in Conflict Settings International Studies Association March 26, 2002 New Orleans, La. 700112 Nancy Mock, Dr. P.H. and Ellen Mathys, M.P.H. Tulane University

  2. Conflict and HIV:Background • Since its discovery in the early 80’s, we are only now seeing any detectable evidence that HIV prevention strategies are having ANY impact on HIV incidence • After 20 years, the epidemiology of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa is still poorly understood • There was a deliberate policy decision taken by the donor community to collect highly limited information on population-level HIV status • Until very recently, HIV prevention/care strategies were stove-piped in the health sector • Until now, conflict management strategies have been stove-piped into humanitarian assistance and “transition” programs

  3. Why business as usual will not work • Collective wisdom says that traditional HIV prevention/management programs take decades to work and have limited effects • Current data suggest that HIV epidemic progression can be explosive when the isolating effects of conflict are removed • Relief/transition/development stove-piping misses the windows of opportunity to attack the driving forces of HIV, which are always accentuated in conflict settings

  4. African Population Database: 1990 Population Density Distribution Source: UNEP/GRID

  5. Africa: Major Routes

  6. Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of Principal Causes of HIV Risk in Conflict-Affected Populations Violent Conflict Population Vulnerability to HIV HIV Hazard/ Exposure Opportunity Population HIV Risk Social Ecology of HIV

  7. Decrease Increased isolation of communities Increased death rates among high risk groups Increased death rates among HIV-infected Decreased casual sex associated with trauma and depression Disruption of sexual networks Increase Increased interaction among military/combatants and civilians Increased levels of commercial sex Decreased availability of STI and other health services Decreased utilization of health services Increased levels of malnutrition Decreased access to knowledge and means to prevent HIV transmission Large internal or regional population movements Emergence of norms of sexual predation and violence Conflict-associated factors that increase and decrease HIV risk

  8. Risk and Vulnerability Assessments • Identify distinct high risk and vulnerable groups • Map the dynamics of population mixing both internal and external to the system • Identify key leverage points for prevention • Repeating the process over time based on impact assessment • Anticipate risk as far out as possible, ie. early warning

  9. Model of US Government Response to Conflict and Complex Emergencies Security Survival Governance Sustainable Development USAID/OFDA US Military USAID/OTI USAID COMMERCE Humanitarian Cycle Community and Societal Cooperation Long-term Economic Development Active Gunfire And Fighting Source: Lyerly, W., 1999

  10. Implications for Programming • Prevention initiatives must be aggressive during active conflict and transition • Interventions should be risk-reduction driven • Integration of HIV prevention into other sectoral/programs to create synergies • Intervention strategic planning should consider and include regional and micro-ecological factors

  11. A Note on the Need for Information-Driven Action • Large scale household survey programs such as the Demographic and Health Survey Program can now be used to generate population-based seroprevalence levels and most transition countries implement DHS • The humanitarian community is increasingly applying rapid probability surveys in active conflict contexts. These can be utilized as vehicles for serostatus assessment where appropriate • Early warning systems are emerging in a variety of areas. That will facilitate the rapid development of geospatial information

More Related