E N D
1. Introduction
2. LOCATION: Sacramento, CA, USA
3. LOCATION: Sacramento, CA, USA
4. Winter Proposal: Square Base
5. Winter Proposal: Double Square Base
6. Design Matrix
7. Design Approach
8. Design Approach
9. Design Concept
10. First Floor Plan
11. Second Floor Plan
12. Third Floor Plan
13. Solar Study
14. Building Efficiency
15. Structural Constraints Gravity Loads
16. Structural Constraints Lateral Loads
17. Gravity System
18. Cantilever System
19. Structural Bay System
20. Bay Components
21. Lateral System
22. Foundations
23. Truss to Pier Detail
24. Elevation Views
25. Dynamic Analysis
26. Site (facing west)
27. Site Layout
28. 210 ton Hydraulic Crawler Crane
Lift 9 ton truss @ 120 from crane
Loader/Excavator
Concrete Boom Truck
Pile Driver
Manlift Equipment
29. Estimate
30. Implementation Schedule
31. HVAC Centralized Ventilation and Cooling on 3rd floor
2- Trane 12.5 ton Voyager Packaged Cooling with Electric Heat Rooftop Units
Centralized (radiant) heating throughout
Individual Perimeter AC units on 1st and 2nd floors
Trane UV-D8-1 Classroom Air Conditioners
32. Construction Sequence
33. Upgrade Options
Aesthetic Improvement: Upgrade interior finish in 2nd and 3rd floor circulation areas
California Gold Slate tiles- $7/sf
Add $44,800 (6400 sf)
Reduce Life-Cycle Costs:
PV cells on roof and solar electric generator
Initial Cost: $5/watt ($1.8m, $60,000/year over 30-year period)
Life-Cycle Savings on Power: $15/watt (over 30 yrs)
Total Savings: $3.6 million for 12kW Building
34. Team Interaction: Winter vs Spring
35. Team Interaction: Winter vs Spring
36. AEC Interaction - Framing
37. AEC Interaction - HVAC
38. Conclusions and Recommendations Lessons learned:
Better and faster decisions can be made during Schematic Design Phase using AEC Integration method.
Technology can be a powerful tool when it works.
How it can be improved:
Critical that A-E-C students be exposed to collaborative tools and methods during their tertiary education.
Future prospect:
Collaborative design-build has tremendous potential, but limited now by design accountability.
39. The River2001 Team would like to acknowledge the following persons for their direct and indirect contributions throughout our discovery journey.
RENATE FRUCHTER, Stanford Univesity
ROXANNE ZOLIN, Stanford University
ROBERT ALVARADO, CM Salter Architect
SCOTT DENNIS, MBT Architect
ERIC HORN, Webcor Builders
BOYD PAULSON, Stanford University
BOB TATUM, Stanford University
KIM RODDIS, Kansas University
RYAN STRAUPE, Pacific Energy Center,
PG & E
Staff of CIFE, and
our fellow friends and colleagues. Acknowledgements