1 / 11

Pawan Prasher, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD Marvin L. Hsiao, MD W Matthew Petroll, Ph D

Corneal Interface Morphology After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Pawan Prasher, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD Marvin L. Hsiao, MD W Matthew Petroll, Ph D R. Wayne Bowman, MD James P. McCulley, MD V. Vinod Mootha, MD.

suzuki
Download Presentation

Pawan Prasher, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD Marvin L. Hsiao, MD W Matthew Petroll, Ph D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Corneal Interface Morphology After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Pawan Prasher, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD Marvin L. Hsiao, MD W Matthew Petroll, Ph D R. Wayne Bowman, MD James P. McCulley, MD V. Vinod Mootha, MD University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas

  2. Introduction • Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is a novel technique that allows selective replacement of dysfunctional corneal endothelium. • Despite favorable visual outcomes, fewer patients than expected achieve best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20. • The probable factors limiting vision include interface (IF) haze, increased corneal thickness, subepithelial scarring,1and anatomical changes in the posterior corneal surface.

  3. To study interface (IF) morphology by confocal microscopy in patients undergoing DSEK for corneal edema secondary to corneal endothelial cell dysfunction Ten eyes of 10 patients with no associated ocular morbidity were assessed at 6 months post-op after DSEK surgery All eyes underwent clinical examination, confocal microscopy and Pentacam densitometry measurement Purpose Materials and Methods

  4. Results • Mean age was 63.3+/-8.4 years • No cornea had clinically significant IF haze on slit lamp examination • BCVA ranged from 20/20 to 20/50 • On confocal microscopy, IF was indiscernible in 2/10 cases • IF was characterized by highly reflective particles in other (8/10) cases • No significant keratocyte activation was seen at IF in any case • The mean density of IF particles was 30.25±25.45 particles/mm2 • The mean depth of IF was 516.86±56.82µm and mean thickness of the endothelial graft was 128.26±30.75µm • The mean measured IF reflectivity was 90.87±52.29 confocal back scatter units (CBU) which was significantly less compared to subepithelial reflectivity of 447±350.3 CBU (p=0.005) • Significant keratocyte activation with high reflectivity was seen in subepithelium or superficial stroma in 7/10 cases

  5. Representative images of IF showing highly reflective particles of varying dimensions

  6. Representative images of quiescent stroma without IF peak or particles

  7. Representative images of keratocyte activation and increased reflectivity in anterior stroma

  8. Representative Pentacam images showing characteristic peaks and particles at the level of IF Peak corneal density was seen in anterior stroma in all casesIF particles were observed in 6/10 cases

  9. Representative Pentacam images showing homogenous stroma without peaks or particles at the level of IF The mean corneal density at the anterior stroma (41.53±12.61) was significantly higher than that of measured at the IF(26.38±7.33) (p=0.004).

  10. Discussion • In vivo confocal microscopy has been widely used for the in vivo microscopic imaging of healthy and pathologic corneas, including after refractive surgery and lamellar transplants.2 • Presence of reflective particles is one of the most consistent findings in studies involving confocal microscopy of the IF. • The exact nature and clinical consequences of IF particles are largely unknown. Various speculated sources include biologic debris from the ocular surface, powder from surgical gloves, remnants from industrial processing of the blade, and metal fragments from the steel blade and small plastic fragments generated by the metal and plastic interaction inside the oscillating microkeratome.3,4 • Absence of significant haze or keratocyte activation after DSEK can be attributed to smoother IFs resulting from Descemet stripping in the host and microkeratome cut in the donor. • The measurements of significantly higher reflectivity (CBU) in the anterior stroma as compared to IF is consistent with previously reported findings in other types of posterior lamellar transplants,4 and may be attributed to preoperative subepithelial fibrosis.

  11. Conclusions • The corneal stroma appears quiescent at the level of DSEK IF with minimal or no keratocyte activation. • In the anterior stroma, confocal microscopy showed increased reflectivity and Pentacam showed peak corneal density likely related to pre-operative subepithelial fibrosis References 1. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;18(4):290-4. 2. Marchini G, Mastropasqua L, Pedrotti E, Nubile M, Ciancaglini M, Sbabo A. Deep lamellar keratoplasty by intracorneal dissection: a prospective clinical and confocal microscopic study. Ophthalmology. 2006 Aug;113(8):1289-300. 3. Ivarsen A, Thøgersen J, Keiding SR, Hjortdal JØ, Møller-Pedersen T. Plastic particles at the LASIK interface. Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):18-23. 4. Mootha VV, Dawson D, Kumar A, Gleiser J, Qualls C, Albert DM. Slitlamp, specular, and light microscopic findings of human donor corneas after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 May;122(5):686-92 5. Silvera DA, Fabrizio MJ, Goins KM. The Characterization of Interface Haze Following DLEK. IOVS 2007;48:ARVO E-Abstract 4715.

More Related