1 / 21

Two Commercialization Perspectives: Inside a Startup and From Administration

Two Commercialization Perspectives: Inside a Startup and From Administration. Jonathan Rose, Professor and Chair The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Toronto. Startup Company Background/Story. My research field: Semiconductors (“chips”)

sylvialucas
Download Presentation

Two Commercialization Perspectives: Inside a Startup and From Administration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Two Commercialization Perspectives:Inside a Startup and From Administration Jonathan Rose, Professor and Chair The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Toronto

  2. Startup Company Background/Story • My research field: Semiconductors (“chips”) • Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) • Prefabricated chips that are programmable • Programmable hardware • Advantages: • Can build hardware ‘instantly’ (vs. months) • Lower cost in low volume • Disadvantages: • Slower, consume more power • Much more expensive in high volume

  3. My Research • Architecture of FPGAs • What do you put on the chip to make it better? • Computer-Aided Design Tools & Algorithms • Needed to transform and optimize a hardware design into the information that configures the FPGA • Covers a wide range of disciplines • transistor-level circuit design, • architecture • software and algorithms

  4. Research • Group was among the first in this field of chips and CAD • Produced a number of basic & then advanced results on • FPGA architecture • FPGA CAD Tools • One key contribution: software package, called VPR, • Enabled the exploration of FPGA Architecture • Widely used as the basis for other’s research on CAD algorithms and tools for FPGAs • Available free on web since 1997, and evolved since then

  5. The Company Began with Talking • “Wouldn’t it be neat to ….” • Start a company that does this … • Not that different from scientific/engineering innovation • My graduate students and I just began talking about ideas for companies • Kicking ideas around about what company would be • why one would want to do this

  6. Our Motivation • Desire to start a company • Having seen this activity in Silicon Valley • In 1997/8 a lot of activity starting in Canada • Real excitement in this field • Broad realization that FPGAs were a key to access “the technology of our time” (microelectronics) • Sense that we had unique advantages: • Knowledge/expertise/understanding • People • Reputation

  7. One Day … • I gathered several students into a room and said… • Do we really want to do this? • Are we ready to make a commitment to try a startup? • To do so we each would have to forgo: • Students: job opportunities • Me: other activities • This was a key turning point • We all said ‘yes’ • Helped by my wife’s reverse psychology: • “You’ll never do this” • Realized that I had to give up other activities; • It is difficult for a Professor to face this

  8. Two Issues at Germination Time • Gathering students in a room places supervisor in a conflict of interest • Interest of company/self vs. interest of University • Disclosed to students • Should disclose to Chair • As chair I ask to speak with all students working with Prof who is starting a company • Some Professors comprehend conflict of interest, some don’t • Have heard one anecdote of supervisor ‘forcing’ student to work in company at an American University • Had to select those students I wanted to work with

  9. The Story • We agreed on a business plan • sevelop & sell software & architecture for FPGAs • to current vendors of FPGA and wannabees • Premise: we could do it better • Gained rights to software from University • Paid small license fee ($10K) to University • Four co-founders • Myself, 2 students graduating, 1 Research Associate • Call ourselves “Right Track CAD” Corporation • I advertised • Talked to my contacts in the industry & at conference

  10. Story • Two companies became interested • Cypress Semiconductor: talked at length; slow progress • Altera: came to us; signed contract that brought us into business in two months • First payment was enough to rent space, buy computers, pay salaries and get started • Somewhat unusual “bootstrap” method • Usual funding methods: • pay with own time • Friends & family funding, • Govt funding, • Angel investment -> venture capital

  11. Things Went Well • 1st contract with Altera was roaring success • Delivered much better quality software than their own • Met and exceeded all milestones • Contract had bonus: $ = f ( Quality, Execution Time) • CAD Papers compete on these two metrics to gain publication • Here was that same goal motivated instead by Profit • Maxed Bonus – hit maximum exactly • Signed 2nd contract with Cypress also a success • Developing FPGA architecture & tools for Cypress Semiconductor

  12. Story • Altera, very happy • Made offer to buy Right Track: Rejected not serious • Instead negotiated new contract with much stronger hand • Began to deliver on second contract • Made second approach to acquire • more serious, agreed to terms • Were acquired • Donated $150K to University from Company • Created the Altera Toronto Technology Centre

  13. Altera Toronto Technology Centre Right Track had 12 employees at acquisition Altera Toronto now has ~100 employees, mostly Engineers Responsible for key aspects of Altera’s FPGAs and software Known as a very successful acquisition

  14. My Role • Began as Right Track’s President • In first year 1999, work 65% at University 35% at Company • Bad ratio, switched to 20% University, 80% company • Had startup-supportive Chair of Department • Kept research program alive, no teaching • Key to keep funding and graduate student flow; very hard to restart – strongly advise! • After acquisition at Altera • For three years, served as Director of Software Engineering • Oversaw the unit’s growth from 12 to 65 people • Still at 20-80 rate • Returned to University after these 4 years in 2003

  15. Time Split is a Crucial Decision • Reason 65-35 split is bad: • It is not clear who master is, too split • 80-20 or 20-80 makes it clear, highly recommend • 20% works out to 1 day/week • Wonderful synergy remains with Altera • Research funding • I provide good recommendations of students to hire • Surprise: they provide excellent recommendations for graduate students who served as co-ops in the company • Have a nice monthly FPGA seminar with Altera Toronto, Xilinx Toronto, and surrounding Universities

  16. Other Learnings • Starting a company is really exciting • Can be like a great research enterprise • Allows me to bring some reality into classroom • 5 minute entrepreneurship talks • Perspective on real software engineering • What I look for in a prospective employee • Tons of good, relevant anecdotes • Profit motive is different from Knowledge motive • Takes some getting used to, but it is all common sense • Isn’t fundamentally evil, just a different target

  17. Some Necessary Conditions for Success • People involved must really want to do it • There must be an idea that someone will pay money for • vs. the knowledge goal of University – can’t just be “neat” • Need prospect of more money coming than goes out • Aka “Profit motive” • Common Sense • Funding • Need Right mix of people • Right skills, outlook, and trust • As Chair, I discuss these and other issues with Faculty considering doing start ups

  18. Learnings • Running company not too different than running a research program • Need ideas, smart people, execution marketing • Some say Profs don’t make good CEOs • True, mostly, but not always; better off as CTOs • Company is more team oriented than University • Everyone is working towards the same goal • Must keep “corporation” alive and healthy • Universities at the largest sense also have common goal, but everyone doesn’t necessarily pull together • Role of Chair/Dean is to remind people of common goal when lose sight of it.

  19. Research Funding from Companies • They key to unlocking a lot of matching funding these days • Canadian companies less likely to engage than USA • Too focussed on short term, need to find people with vision and interest & understanding of value • As Director at Altera, I believed it was useful simply to bring academics in to talk to have people think about something different • Folks at Companies are really busy – need to find a way to get message across concisely • They’re just like you – short of time;

  20. Administration of Startups at UofT • Has had 8 startups in the past 10 years • Several underway right now • My role: • Support faculty, generally, in these endeavours • Protect faculty/students from Conflict of Interest Issues • Need to beware: • Professors that over-commit & don’t do academic duties well • Professors that stay out too long – seems wrong

  21. Finally • Startups are a key way to transfer technology • Our unique methods of developing FPGAs are now embedded as part of a $1.4B company • Startup creates good economic activity • An exciting way to bring knowledge back into University

More Related