1 / 16

Positive Political Theory

Positive Political Theory. Clint Dillard Why Party Government? Negative Agenda Power Gary, Cox, McCubbins . Ch. 2-3. Why are there Political Parties?. Parties are created to solve internal collective action problems

tamah
Download Presentation

Positive Political Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Positive Political Theory Clint Dillard Why Party Government? Negative Agenda Power Gary, Cox, McCubbins. Ch. 2-3

  2. Why are there Political Parties? • Parties are created to solve internal collective action problems -Legislators form political parties to bind themselves together in durable situations -Legislation would be unpredictable and unprofitable • Parties are created to solve external collective action problems - Legislators use parties as brand names (reputation for electoral votes)

  3. How are Parties Organized • Parties as Firms -Single chief executive officers - They involve delegation to party leaders (central agents) - To reduce transaction costs - To improve collective action problems

  4. How are Parties Organized • Parties as Partnerships - Parties have “Senior Partners” in order to distribute responsibility, offices, and determine direction - Partners help keep other partners in check in order to benefit the overall party - Keeps full responsibility away from Speaker/President

  5. What Do Parties Do? • Floor Voting Coalitions - Maintain discipline with their members in order to ensure cohesive voting - Gives more power to party leaders when there are larger disagreements between parties • Procedural Coalitions - Central issue is the majority party’s ability to control the legislative agenda - Legislative agenda: set of bills considered and voted on the floor

  6. How Majority Parties Control the Agenda • Strict party discipline (Costly) • Positive agenda power: Proposal Rights - Ability to push bills through the legislative process to a final passage vote on the floor • Negative agenda power: Veto Rights - Ability to block bills from reaching a final passage vote on the floor

  7. Procedural Cartel Theory • States that the majority party exerts substantial influence over legislative outcomes through control of the legislative agenda • Uses 6 Assumptions for theory’s goals • A-1: Members seek reelection, advancement, good public policy, and majority status -Majority status is the gateway to internal advancement and policy goals

  8. Procedural Cartel Theory • A-2: Reputation (Brand name) of the party affects both probability of reelection and majority vote • A-3: Reputation of the party depends upon the record of legislative accomplishment • A-4: A good legislative record (A-3) entails cooperation within the party itself

  9. Procedural Cartel Theory • A-5: Delegating to a central authority is the primary way to unify and regulate a party • **A-6: The main resource that a majority party delegates to senior officers is the legislative agenda - Monopolize the agenda-setting power - Gives its majority members all main agenda- setting offices

  10. Senior Officers • Majority secures all chairs, the speakership, and a large proportion of the Rules Committee • Pursuing personal benefits is a major loss - Crimes of Commission: Pushing legislation one’s party mostly dislikes - Crimes of Omission: Failure to aid (or blocking) legislation one’s party mostly likes

  11. Members • Discipline is referred to members voting for the party • Parties use the tactic “If you help me, I will help you” • If a member votes for a bill their colleagues oppose  They run a clear risk • If a member help ensure a bill’s success  They run a smaller risk

  12. Members • Party pressure can affect members decisions on procedure more than the decision of substance • Why doesn’t a member switch parties? - Loss of one member is not pivotal to a party - After switch, they are not trusted in their new party - Research shows that switched members have a drastically reduced number of terms • Minority Parties benefit from the internal divisions of the majority

  13. Negative Agenda Power • Modeling Agenda Power: Ability to influence what gets voted on, when, and how • Majority uses agenda power to keep bill off the floor

  14. Agenda Models • Floor Agenda Model - Simpler - Agenda is determined by a majority on the floor • Cartel Agenda Model - Agenda is determined by the senior partners of the majority party - More in the interest of the overall party - Majority almost always votes for Cartel

  15. Cartel > Floor • Formula for Cartel - Policy gains- Policy loss+ Office Benefits+ Distributive Benefits • Cartel Gains - Office Benefits: Opportunity to advance - Districts served by senior members show more economic growth - Distributive Benefit: Large share of issues House decides

  16. Conclusion • Parties goal is to gain majority and control the floor agenda • Cartel Model is more often used because of the use of senior officers that delegate the duties of the floor • Member loyalty is crucial in order to unify the parties and maintain their reputations

More Related