1 / 19

Creating a National Data Model for Education

Margaret Heritage, CRESST Raymond Yeagley, NWEA. Creating a National Data Model for Education. National Forum on Education Statistics. Mission: improve the quality, usefulness, timeliness, and comparability of education data State/Federal/Local partnership with associate members

Download Presentation

Creating a National Data Model for Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Margaret Heritage, CRESST Raymond Yeagley, NWEA Creating a National Data Model for Education

  2. National Forum on Education Statistics • Mission: improve the quality,usefulness, timeliness, andcomparability of education data • State/Federal/Local partnership withassociate members • Primary method of service delivery is communicating shared ideas and best practices through meetings and publications • http://nces.ed.gov/forum

  3. Why A National Data Model? • Creating a more complete data picture of the pK-12 environment will help to: • Facilitate data transfer between applications and data storage within schools and districts • Conceptualize how to streamline vertical reporting from the school, to district, regional, state, and ultimately to the federal level. • Enable development of tools educators need to collect and analyze the data necessary to improve instruction and increase student learning. • Guide RFP writers/responders, vendors, teachers, administrators, researchers, and others in better organizing and using data

  4. Initial Framework:Education Organizations SEA Board SEA Intermediate Unit Finance LEA Board LEA LEA Staff Facilities Food Service School Accountability Transportation

  5. Initial Framework:Teaching and Learning Qualifications Instructional Programs and Curriculum Course/Class Staff Professional Development Safety and Discipline Student Programs Health Participation & Activities Attendance Assessment

  6. Intent of the Task Force • Create an organized collection of • concepts and entities that need to be tracked • multidimensional structure that includes relationships • Define relationships among the entities as a first-order concept – i.e., relationships are as important as data elements. • Avoid replicating data dictionaries. Use standards and established definitions, linked to NCES handbooks and other resources. • Establish that a major feature of the model will be unique sets of attributes for each entity, and the relationships among entities. • Deliver the model through a system that will invite constant expansion and update.

  7. Defining Relationships with OWL and XML: <<Description about="Course"> <providesServicesTo resource="Student"/> <isAComponentOf resource="Curriculum"/> </Description> <<Description about="School"> <facilitates resource="Curriculum"/> <isAMemberOf resource="LEA"/> </Description>

  8. Asking questions about • Individual student and cohort growth over time • Student characteristics related to performance • Special program and instructional strategy effectiveness • Return on investment • Teacher characteristics related to student growth • School performance characteristics • Parents and community • Impact of federal, state, and local policy on learning • Sample Attributes • Phone Number • IM Address • Name • Type of Instruction (e.g. Monitored, Mainstream) • Assessment Score Type • Learning Style • Self-efficacy • Sample Entities • School Bus • Student • Teacher • Assessment Score • Lesson • Skill • Perception • School What are the measures, characteristics, or other information about the Entity that we need to collect and store? What are the important relationships among the entities that we need to include in the model? What are the persons, places, things, or events we need to know about? What do we need to keep track of to answer the questions? What do we need to know? What are the important questions that need to be answered? The Process Question/Issue Data Elements List Entity Attribute Organize Taxonomy of Entities Conceptual Model Assert Functional Relationship

  9. Teaching and Learning Subgroup • What are the questions that need to be answered by states, districts and schools about teaching and learning? • What are the attributes that states, districts and schools will need in a database to answer the questions now, and in the future? • How can these attributes be measured?

  10. Sample Questions • What instructional practices are related to what levels of achievement/motivation/self- regulation in core subjects/21st century skills for students with which characteristics? • What interventions with what characteristics are most closely associated with the greatest return on investment as measured by student academic growth per dollar spent?

  11. Sample Questions • What type of assessment systems lead to increased use of assessment data and what are the effects on student achievement? • To what degree is the motivation of students with what characteristics related to curriculum relevance?

  12. Attributes of the Program Entity Financial Academic Goals Human Non-academic Goals Goals Curricular Participation Resources Used Facilities Enrollment Equipment GUID Technology Program Availability Local ID NCES Program Type Identifier Characteristic Program Name Program Periodicity State ID Target/Served Population Characteristics Location Person Outcome Outcome Locus Interface Non-person Outcome Schedule Service Provider {Other Entity Relations} Targets Student Measures of Effectiveness Benchmarks Staff

  13. Sample Attributes: Instructional Programs and Curriculum • Clearly articulated learning goals • Curriculum coherence • Enacted curriculum • Interdisciplinary curricula • Curriculum relevance • Instructional strategies • Opportunity to learn • Learning environments

  14. Sample Attributes: Assessment • Aligned assessment system • Evidence of learning: • Individual student achievement (e.g., summative state and district wide tests) • Artifacts (e.g., models, oral presentations, written work) • Observations • 21st Century skills assessment (e.g., media and technology, team work, innovation and creativity) • Motivation • Self-efficacy • Rate of Learning

  15. Consensogram • SEAs can have a significant impact on the quality and use of data by LEAs to increase individual student learning. • It is important for our SEA to provide direct support to LEAs related to use of student level data for instructional improvement.

  16. Table Discussion • What is striking about the graphs on the wall? • How might these statements be addressed by different populations? • What is the best mechanism for gathering data related to the teaching/learning process? • What entities and attributes are essential for using data to increase student learning?

  17. How can States Help? • Provide leadership • Establish expectations and policies • Create conditions • Model effective data use • Put systems in place • Provide training in data use (including measurement)

  18. Table Discussion • Do you agree with what has been suggested about how states can help support LEAs? • if not why, not – how else do you think states could support LEAs?

  19. Margaret Heritage: mheritag@ucla.edu Raymond Yeagley: Raymond.Yeagley@nwea.org Vince Paredes: vparedes@sifinfo.org Contacts for Information

More Related