1 / 55

AAMP Training Materials

This training module explores different options for increasing productivity among asset-poor farmers, focusing on conservation farming techniques and the use of linear programming optimization methods.

tamikoa
Download Presentation

AAMP Training Materials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAMP Training Materials Steven Haggblade (MSU) blade@msu.edu Module 1.4: Options for Raising Productivity Among Resource-Poor Farmers

  2. Outline • Objectives • Profile of cotton farm households in Zambia • Sources of CF productivity gains • Linear programming (LP) optimization methods • LP Exercises & Discussion • References

  3. Asset-poor farm households • How can a farmer with low assets increase productivity? • This man has a farm, his own labor, and a hand hoe – the most basic technology.

  4. Asset-poor farm households • The average farm household has land, family labor, and several hand hoes • Can their technology be improved to boost farm productivity?

  5. Asset-poor farm households • The families in the previous slides have little money, do not use herbicides, and are unlikely to have access to animal traction • What the families do have is labor • So, if families can increase labor productivity, they can increase farm productivity too • The following discussion focuses on cotton farmers in Zambia, examining the productivity differences between available technology packages and feasible alternatives for households of different asset holdings.

  6. Objectives • Evaluate the impact of Conservation Farming (CF) on asset-poor households compared to conventional tillage • Analyze the impact of different productive technologies • With and without oxen • With and without cash • With and without herbicides

  7. Outline • Objectives • Profile of cotton farm households in Zambia • Sources of CF productivity gains • Linear programming (LP) optimization methods • LP Exercises & Discussion • References

  8. Zambian Cotton Farmers

  9. Farm size distribution in AEZ 2a

  10. Asset holdings

  11. Outline • Objectives • Profile of cotton farm households in Zambia • Sources of CF productivity gains • Linear programming (LP) optimization methods • LP Exercises & Discussion • References

  12. Sources of CF Productivity Gains • Minimum tillage • Dry season land preparation • Early planting • Crop residue retention & water harvesting • Precision layout and input application

  13. Sources of CF Productivity Gains • Minimum tillage requires 75% lower energy

  14. Conventional Hand Hoe • Using a hand hoe requires a lot of energy. Every centimeter of land must be turned manually.

  15. Hand Hoe Conservation Farming • In Conservation Farming, only about 15% of the surface area is disturbed in preparing planting basins. Moving less dirt requires less energy and labor.

  16. Conventional Ox Plowing • Conventional plowing inverts all of the soil in the field. For this, the soil must be relatively soft and moist. In clay soils, the trowel-like action of the plow builds up an impermeable plow-pans after years of repeated plowing.

  17. Conservation Farming with Ripper • The CF Ripper can be used before the rains come. It is a minimum tillage method that breaks the hardpan, leaves the rest of the topsoil unturned, and needs less energy.

  18. Sources of CF Productivity Gains • Minimum tillage requires 75% lower energy • Dry season land prep  overcome peak season labour bottlenecks  increased area cultivable with fixed household labour

  19. Dry Season Land Preparation Source: Haggblade and Tembo (2003).

  20. Sources of CF Productivity Gains • Minimum tillage requires 75% lower energy • Dry season land prep  overcome peak season labour bottlenecks  increased area cultivable with fixed household labour • Early planting  1-2% yield increase per day

  21. Gains from Early Planting Sources: Arlussa (1997), Birgess (2009), Haggblade and Tembo (2003), Barratt et al. (2006), Nyagumbo (2007).

  22. Sources of CF Productivity Gains • Minimum tillage requires 75% lower energy • Dry season land prep  overcome peak season labour bottlenecks  increased area cultivable with fixed household labour • Early planting  1-2% yield increase per day • Crop residue  Soil Organic Matter (SOM) buildup  improved moisture retention  higher yields

  23. Dry Season Land Preparation M V P F E R T I L I Z E R Source: Marenya and Barrett (2009)

  24. Water Harvesting, CF Basins Water harvesting boosts the amount of water concen- trated around the crop roots. Useful in semi-arid zones.

  25. Water Harvesting, Rip Lines Water harvesting boosts the amount of water concen- trated around the crop roots. Useful in semi-arid zones.

  26. Sources of Maize Yield Gains Under CF Source: Haggblade and Tembo (2003).

  27. Outline • Objectives • Profile of cotton farm households in Zambia • Sources of CF productivity gains • Linear programming (LP) optimization methods • LP Exercises & Discussion • References

  28. Method: Linear Programming (LP) Model • Maximize Crop Income = • Revenue (∑Pi*Qi)- cost (∑ Pn*Qn) • Subject to household asset constraints • Seasonal labour availability • Animal traction (ANTRAC) • Cash • Land

  29. What Crops to Include?

  30. Alternate Technologies

  31. Seasonal Labour Constraints

  32. Outline • Objectives • Profile of cotton farm households in Zambia • Sources of CF productivity gains • Linear programming (LP) optimization methods • LP Exercises & Discussion • References

  33. Exercise 1 – Baseline Scenario (Setup) • Examine [LP – baseline] sheet in Excel file • Rows 01 – 25 are raw data (do not alter these). • Rows 25 – 45 will change during the exercises. • Rows 50 – 99 are where results are pasted for comparison • Only yellow cells should be changed • Green cells display results

  34. Exercise 1 – Baseline Scenario 0a. Actual Base Case • Before using Excel’s LP model to find the profit maximizing land allocation, first determine farmers’ actual land allocation • Change land allocation choice variables (yellow: line 30) • Input base values (set cells E30:G30 = line E25:G25) • Copy results to section 0.a. (row 53:65) • Copy the entire block of values in yellow and green • When pasting, use “paste values”

  35. Exercise 1 – Baseline Scenario 0b. Low Technology, Profit Maximization • Open LP optimization: Go to Data tab / Solver* • Set objective (H31) • By changing variable cells (E30:G30) • Subject to these constraints • Available technologies (E30:G30 >= 0) • Land holdings (H30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (H39:42 <= D39:42) * If you don’t find the Solver add-in on the Data Tab, you may need to install it: Options/Add-Ins/Analysis Toolpak/Solver.

  36. Exercise 1 – Baseline Scenario 0c. Low Technology, “Safety First” • Set objective (H31) • By changing variable cells (E30:G30) • Subject to these constraints • Available technologies (E30:G30 >= 0) • Land holdings (H30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (H39:42 <= D39:42) • Safety first (H37:38 >= D37:38) * If you don’t find the Solver add-in on the Data Tab, you may need to install it: Options/Add-Ins/Analysis Toolpak/Solver.

  37. LP Results – Baseline Scenario

  38. Discussion questions: Baseline Scenario • Why don’t farmers maximize income? • Why do they adopt the safety-first rule?

  39. Exercise 2 – Conventional Tillage • 1a. Cash constraint, Safety First • Household can use only low-input technologies & must adopt Safety First risk aversion • 1b. No cash constraint, Safety First • Can use all conventional technologies, but must adopt Safety First • 1c. No cash constraint, plow rental possible • Includes all conventional technologies plus ANTRAC >= 0 • 1d. No cash constraint, household owns cattle • All conventional technologies are available in this scenario

  40. Exercise 2 – Conventional Tillage 1a. Cash Constrained, Hand Hoe, Safety First • Open [LP Conventional tillage] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to the constraints • Available technologies (E30, O30, Q30 >= 0; all others == 0) • Land holdings (X30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (X39-42 <= D39-42) • Safety first (X37-38 >= D37-38)

  41. Exercise 2 – Conventional Tillage 1b. No Cash Constraint, Hand Hoe, Safety First • Open [LP Conventional tillage] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to constraints • Available tech: E30, F30, O30, P30, Q30 >= 0 (all else == 0) • Land holdings (same as before) • Seasonal labor (same as before) • Safety first (same as before)

  42. Exercise 2 – Conventional Tillage 1c. Cash Available, ANTRAC Rental OK, Safety First • Open [LP Conventional tillage] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to constraints • Available tech: E30, F30, L30, M30, O30, P30, Q30, V30 >= 0 (all else == 0) • Land holdings (same as before) • Seasonal labor (same as before) • Safety first (same as before)

  43. Exercise 2 – Conventional Tillage 1d. Cash Available, ANTRAC Ownership OK, Safety First • Open [LP Conventional tillage] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to constraints • Available tech: E30, F30, L30, M30, N30, O30, P30, Q30, V30, W30 >= 0 (all else == 0) • Land holdings (same as before) • Seasonal labor (same as before) • Safety first (same as before)

  44. LP Results – Conventional Tillage

  45. Discussion questions: Conventional Tillage • 1b. Why do farmers switch to M2? • 1b. Why do cash costs increase? • 1c. What major changes result when animal traction becomes available? • 1.c. Why do cash costs increase? • 1.d. What is the most important consequence when farmers own draft oxen?

  46. Exercise 3 – Conservation Farming • 2a. Cash constraint, Safety First • Household can use only low-input Conservation Farming technologies & must adopt Safety First strategy • 2b. No cash constraint, Safety First • Can use all CF technologies, but must adopt Safety First • 2c. No cash constraint, CF ripper rental possible • Includes all CF technologies plus animal traction, Safety First • 2d. No cash constraint, herbicides available • All CF technologies are available, plus herbicides, Safety First

  47. Exercise 3 – Conservation Farming 2a. No Cash + Low Input + Safety First • Open [LP conservation farming] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to the constraints • Available technologies (E30, G30, O30, Q30, R30 >= 0; all others == 0) • Land holdings (X30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (X39-42 <= D39-42) • Safety first (X37-38 >= D37-38)

  48. Exercise 3 – Conservation Farming 2b. Cash Available + High-Input CF + Safety First • Open [LP conservation farming] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to the constraints • Available technologies (E30, F30, G30, H30, O30, P30, Q30, R30 >= 0; all others == 0) • Land holdings (X30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (X39-42 <= D39-42) • Safety first (X37-38 >= D37-38)

  49. Exercise 3 – Conservation Farming 2c. Cash + High-Input+ Ripper + Safety First • Open [LP conservation farming] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to the constraints • Available technologies (E30, F30, G30, H30, K30, L30, M30, O30, P30, Q30, R30, U30, V30>= 0; all others == 0) • Land holdings (X30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (X39-42 <= D39-42) • Safety first (X37-38 >= D37-38)

  50. Exercise 3 – Conservation Farming 2d. Cash + High-Input+ Ripper + Herbicide + Safety First • Open [LP conservation farming] worksheet • Open Solver and input the following • Set objective (X31) • By changing variable cells (E30:W30) • Subject to the constraints • Available tech (E30, F30, G30, H30, I30, J30, K30, L30, M30, O30, P30, Q30, R30, S30, T30, U30, V30>= 0; all others == 0) • Land holdings (X30 <= D30) • Seasonal labor (X39-42 <= D39-42) • Safety first (X37-38 >= D37-38)

More Related