1 / 21

PAIRITEL Photometry of Dwarfs from the IRAC GTO sample

PAIRITEL Photometry of Dwarfs from the IRAC GTO sample. Joseph L. Hora Brian Patten, Massimo Marengo Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2 nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop. IRAC M/L/T Dwarf Program. IRAC bands at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 μ m

tawny
Download Presentation

PAIRITEL Photometry of Dwarfs from the IRAC GTO sample

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PAIRITEL Photometry of Dwarfs from the IRAC GTO sample Joseph L. Hora Brian Patten, Massimo Marengo Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  2. IRAC M/L/T Dwarf Program • IRAC bands at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 μm • IRAC sensitivity, molecular features and continuum sampled • Sample: 87 late M, L, T dwarfs, masses ~70 MJ – 15 MJ • Chosen based on known sources in 2002 • Trigonometric parallax • Well-determined spectral types • Located in uncrowded fields, not known binaries (although some are now known or suspected) • Sources of near-IR photometry are 2MASS, DENIS, SDSS • Possible problems in converting from other photometric systems to 2MASS • Near-IR photometry on this reference sample necessary to identify and classify additional M, L, T candidates 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  3. Molecular features in NIR Dwarf spectra • L dwarfs – absorption from CO and H2O, T dwarfs have broad absorption bands of CH4 and H2O, and H2 absorption • In near-IR photometry, M and L dwarfs become redder with decreasing Teff in J −H and H−K. • The L to T dwarf transition occurs as the silicate and iron condensates (clouds) become buried at increasing depth in late-L dwarfs. • H2O absorption begins to dominate the near-IR spectrum, leading to a bluing of the near-IR colors through the early-T types. • The colors then become even bluer from early-T to late-T with the onset and growth of CH4 absorption and H2 in K. • The overall result is that the J−H and H−K colors for T dwarfs become bluer with increasing spectral subtype, becoming degenerate with the colors of higher mass K and M dwarfs. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  4. M, L, T dwarf spectral features sampled by IRAC • IRAC channel 1 includes much of the CH4 fundamental absorption band (~3.3 μm). • Channel 2 includes the continuum peak present for all stars cooler than 3000 K, making this the most sensitive IRAC channel for the study of sub-stellar objects. • Channel 2 also contains the broad but shallow CO fundamental absorption band (~4.7 μm), whose presence in the T dwarfs provides evidence for non-equilibrium chemistry models • Channel 3 includes H2O absorption and, for low Teff , NH3 absorption. • Channel 4 – molecular absorption due to CH4 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  5. IRAC bandpasses and dwarf spectra 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  6. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  7. Color vs Spectral Type • IRAC-IRAC colors are slowly changing until L-T boundary • Near-IR to IRAC colors show trends throughout the range of types • Combination of all data allow better determination of object class 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  8. Goals of PAIRITEL Measurements • Improved photometry • Some targets close to sensitivity limits of original 2MASS, or SDSS or DENIS surveys • Some photometry affected by nearby sources in field, due to high proper motion the stars are now better separated • Variability monitoring • Variations for example due to uneven coverage of the surface in CH4 or other types of weather which could cause changes in flux • Rotation periods 1-10 hr have been detected in dwarfs • Presence of variations in T dwarfs not well established • 2–17% variations observed by Artigau et al. 2003 in J &H • Others report monitoring with no variations detected • PAIRITEL observations to sample at various frequencies of 1/night+ over months+ timescales • IRAC continuous monitoring for hours of dwarfs saw no variability • Cycle 3 GTO program to sample hours, weeks, months timescales 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  9. PAIRITEL Observation Status • 68 objects in program • Observations started ~Jan 23 2006 • 24/35 done for objects where only 1 observation requested • 24/33 of monitoring stars have at least one measurement • Median number is 17 samples, most have goal of 50 samples 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  10. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  11. Quick look at DWARF program data • A couple stars with M<15 have been observed ~20 x • Use pipeline mosaics • Poor weather data tossed out • All sources >10σ in each band found • Aperture photometry performed (iraf/phot task) on sources • Bandmerge performed to generate J/H/K catalog • Catalog then matched to 2MASS data • Zero point adjustment determined to minimize median difference between 2MASS and PAIRITEL photometry for all matched sources <15mag • To obtain higher S/N, mosaics averaged and photometry performed as above on these frames 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  12. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  13. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  14. Single measurements • DWARF 50 • DWARF 53 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  15. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  16. 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  17. 2MA1237+6527 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  18. 2MA1237+6527 2MASS 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  19. 2MA1237+6527 PAIRITEL 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  20. 2MASS 15394189-05204026 (P=G, 2MA=R) 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

  21. Next steps - • Refine photometry extraction – • Find optimal photometry parameters – radius, background estimation, zero point adjustments • Confirm error estimate • Automate process • Perform photometry on remainder of sample • Perform frequency analysis • Identify candidates that have variations or differences from 2MASS photometry • Continue monitoring candidates • Write up results 2nd Annual PAIRITEL Workshop

More Related