1 / 34

Students Teaching Students

Students Teaching Students. How an Innovative Peer-Led Study Group Program Helps First-Year Students Succeed in Introductory Science Courses Joe Salvatore – Director of Peer-Led Study Groups Science Learning Center University of Michigan. Peer-Led Study Group Program At-A-Glance.

tender
Download Presentation

Students Teaching Students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Students Teaching Students How an Innovative Peer-Led Study Group Program Helps First-Year Students Succeed in Introductory Science Courses Joe Salvatore – Director of Peer-Led Study Groups Science Learning Center University of Michigan

  2. Peer-Led Study Group Program At-A-Glance • Small groups of up to 12 students • Meet weekly for two hours • Offered for 14 introductory courses in biology, chemistry, and physics • Led by a peer facilitator who has taken the course successfully • Emphasize students teaching and learning from each other

  3. Current Program (Winter 2006) • 132 Study Groups • 105 Study Group Leaders • 1520 Study Group Members

  4. Program Philosophy The Peer-Led Study Group Program provides students with opportunities to teach and learn from each other in small, structured groups guided by trained facilitators

  5. Program Goals • Improve learning by challenging students to explain what they know • Enhance critical thinking by providing opportunities for students to explain their reasoning • Encourage problem-solving and knowledge application • Expose students to diverse perspectives and new ways of thinking

  6. Staff • One full-time director • Four program assistants • Undergraduates • Former study group leaders • Work four hours/week • Earn $13/hour • Provide administrative support, including scheduling groups and basic office tasks

  7. Study Group Members • 41% First Year Students • 39% Sophomores • 19% Juniors and Seniors • 1% Others • 34% Male • 66% Female

  8. Study Group Leaders • 95% Undergraduates • Earned high B or A in course • Many former study group members • High percentage of Pre-Med students • Helps students prepare for MCAT • Recommended by faculty, GSIs, study group leaders

  9. Leaders (Con’t) • Earn $9/hour • Work 3-4 hours/week/group • 2 hours/week meeting time • 45 minutes/week preparation time • Training time • Lead 1-3 study groups/term • Ten hour bank of preparation time/course • Twelve group meetings/term • Sign Leader Contract (H)

  10. Hiring • Advertising on SLC website, University student employment postings, posters • Leader interest forms submitted through website • 20-30 minute interviews • Facilitators chosen based on knowledge of material, communication skills, understanding of program philosophy and goals

  11. Training Overview • Three trainings per term for new leaders • Two trainings per term for returning leaders • Supports program philosophy & addresses weaknesses • Trainings last 2-3 hours (7-9 PM) • Offered two consecutive weekdays to accommodate student schedules (leaders attend one of two days)

  12. Training Overview • Use rooms with large round tables that seat 7-8 to encourage collaboration among leaders • Refreshments provided • Leaders paid for attending training

  13. New Leader Training (H) • Provide vision for program • Model collaborative learning techniques • Provide leaders with tools needed to facilitate groups

  14. New Leader Training • Ask leaders to discuss what they want to say to their group at the first meeting • Buzz Groups - smaller discussion groups • Encourages discussion at start of training • Leaders create own checklist • Review checklist (H)

  15. New Leader Training • Planning study group structure (H) • Write-Pair-Share - typical study group session • Review sample structure • Returning Leader Panel • Experiences, challenges, and successes

  16. New Leader Training • Role Play Scenarios (H) • Act out and discuss positive and negative ways of dealing with typical challenges • Case Study (H) • Good summary activity • Two Questions Feedback Form

  17. Mid-Term Training • Reciprocal teaching of collaborative learning techniques • Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty by Barkley, Cross, & Major • Gives leaders opportunities to work with other leaders of the same course to apply techniques to their discipline

  18. Mid-Term Training • Best Discussion Techniques • Write-Pair-Share • Round Robin • Buzz Groups

  19. Mid-Term Training • Best Reciprocal Peer Teaching Techniques • Note-Taking Pairs • Learning Cell • Jigsaw • Test-Taking Teams

  20. Mid-Term Training • Best Problem-Solving Techniques • Think-Aloud Pair Problem Solving • Send-a-Problem • Structured Problem Solving

  21. End-of-Term Training • Memory and Mnemonic Devices • Overview of how memory works • Explanation of multiple mnemonic systems • Link System • Story System • Loci System • Peg System • Your Memory: How It Works and How to Improve It by Kenneth Higbee

  22. End-of-Term Training • Self-Evaluations (H) • Leaders complete self-evaluation and discuss major challenges • Self-evaluations copied and return to leaders • Include their goals for the next term (if applicable) • Reviewed during feedback meetings following observations

  23. Other Training Topics • Learning Theory • Bloom’s Taxonomy • Perry’s Scheme of Cognitive Development • Knowing and Reasoning in College (Marcia Baxter Magolda) • Creating and evaluating worksheets and activities • Developing effective questions

  24. Observations • Provides snapshot of leader’s style and group dynamics • Focuses on new leaders for current term • Program Director and program assistants observe leaders for 20-30 minutes • Observation form mirrors self-evaluation form (H)

  25. Observations • Use of Tablet PC with Webcam • Allows observation form to be completed electronically and linked with audio and video • Easier to provide constructive feedback to leaders when you can show them • Camera can be focused on leader or members

  26. Observation Feedback Session • Occurs 24-48 hours after observation • Begins with leader discuss whether session was typical • What did they think worked and didn’t work? • Feedback given using sandwich approach • Positive-Constructive-Positive • Go through each question of observation form, accessing video as needed

  27. End-of-Term Surveys • Provides feedback about members’ experiences in the program • 20 questions evaluating their study group leader • Responses compiled and averaged for each group, course, and program • Subjective comments provided • Each leader receives copy of evaluation form (H) • Program Director meets with leaders with serious concerns

  28. End-of-Term Surveys • Survey data can point to leaders’ weaknesses individually or as a program • Must consider number of members completing survey • Overall survey data positive

  29. Fall 2004 and Winter 2005 Survey Results Effects of Study Group Participation Effect Winter 05’ Fall 05’ % Reporting % Reporting Positive Effect Positive Effect Learning of Subject Matter 93% 90% Understanding Difficult Material 93% 89% Confidence in Mastery of Material 77% 78% Exam Grades 75% 78% n=379 n=653

  30. Fall 2004 and Winter 2005 Survey Results Effects of Study Group Participation Effect ’Winter 05’ Fall ‘05 % Reporting % Reporting More Likely to More Likely to Join Another Science S.G. 87% 86% Recommend S.G. to Friend 91% 89% Take More Science Classes 41% 40% Major in Science 37% 37% n=379 n=645

  31. Training Challenges • Difficulty in training all leaders during one session • Choosing relevant topics that engage all leaders, particularly returning leaders • Finding ways to capitalize on returning leader experience

  32. Observation Challenges • Making time to observe all new leaders early enough in the term • Member/Leader discomfort with video recording • Difficulty in camera placement • Audio problems

  33. Conclusion • Training should support program philosophy and address program weaknesses • Effective training engages leaders from the start • Observations provide supervisors with sense of leaders’ strengths and weaknesses • Feedback sessions allow leaders to reestablish goals

  34. Questions

More Related