1 / 24

Mass Media: Law & Regulation

Mass Media: Law & Regulation. Media has a special status under the U.S. Constitution The First Amendment

thad
Download Presentation

Mass Media: Law & Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mass Media: Law & Regulation • Media has a special status under the U.S. Constitution • The First Amendment • Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. • The press acts as a Fourth Estate • Fourth branch of government • Keeps power of government manageable and accountable • Media are businesses • Operated to make a profit • Legal and regulatory issues require a balance • Interest of the individual • Interest of government

  2. Attempts to Restrict the Press • Alien and Sedition Laws of 1798 • Writing false, scandalous and malicious statements against the government, Congress or the President • Eleven people were tried for violation of the law • Law expired in 1801 • The Espionage Act of 1918 • Forbade statements against the war effort during World War I • Eugene V. Debs and 886 others were convicted of violating the law • Smith Act of 1940 • Press required to submit stories for official censorship during WW II • House Un-American Activities Committee • McCarthy Committee hunted for Communists in the mass media • Established a restrictive atmosphere in television and the movies

  3. Near v. Minnesota • Prior Restraint • Censoring information before the information appears or is published • Saturday Press • Published by J.M. Near • Printed name of people who violated the prohibition laws • Minnesota authorities obtained a court order to stop the publication of the Saturday Press • U.S. Supreme Court overturned the state court • The court said that prior restraint was allowable only under specific conditions • Limit information about troop movement during war • Control of obscenity • Incitement to acts of violence • Overthrow of government

  4. The Pentagon Papers • The New York Times • Published History of U.S. Decision-Making on Vietnam Policy • Given to the Times by one of the authors, Daniel Ellsberg • Justice Department went to court to stop the publication • The New York Times Co. v. United States • Court found that the government had failed to prove that prior restraint was necessary • Held up publication for two weeks • Cost legal fees of $270,000

  5. Grenada • Reagan administration’s invasion of the island of Grenada • Prevent the communist government of Grenada from building an international airport • The Pentagon was worried that the airport could be used by Soviet bombers • Blackout of press • The press was not officially barred from covering the invasion • Pentagon refused to transport press • Turned back reporters who had come on private yachts and airplanes • Took reporters 5 days to reach Grenada • When reporters arrived they discovered that a hospital had been hit by an air strike; no television crews were allowed

  6. The Gulf War • Three weeks into the Gulf War the Pentagon issued a twenty-four hour total news blackout • Pentagon argued that Iraq military could monitor U.S. troops by watching CNN. Pentagon issued no statements about action of coalition troops • Pentagon rules for war coverage • Pool reporting • Press had to travel in groups escorted by a public affairs officer • Pentagon could promote some subjects while avoiding coverage of others • Public favored limitations on the press (79% of those polled) • Similar circumstances have occurred in the War on Terror in Afghanistan

  7. Censorship • The practice of suppressing material that is considered morally, politically, or otherwise objectionable • In U.S., censorship has generally been after the fact • Media has imposed self-censorship • Self-regulation • To avoid possible government censorship

  8. Roth v. United States • Samuel Roth was found guilty in New York court of sending obscene material through the mail • Supreme Court upheld the guilty verdict • Obscenity not protected by the First Amendment • Obscenity is defined as “utterly without redeeming social importance” • Sex and obscenity are not synonymous • Appeals to prurient interest • Roth test • Test for obscenity • Whether the average person, applying community standards, finds that as a whole it appeals to prurient interest

  9. Miller v. California • California court found Marvin Miller guilty of sending obscene unsolicited advertising material through the mail • Supreme Court ruled that state court could censor material that met three a part test for obscenity • The average person, applying contemporary community standards would find the work taken as a whole appeals to prurient interests • Work describes sexual conduct in offensive way specifically defined by state law • Lack of serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value • This is called the LAPS test

  10. School Boards As Censors • School board in New York removed 11 books from school libraries • Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut • Black Boy by Richard Wright • The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris • A work of popular anthropology • California school district requires parental permission to read Ms. • Minnesota school board banned 4 books by Judy Blume • State of Alabama ordered 45 textbooks banned after they were ruled to promote secular humanism • One third of all censorship involves libraries and school curriculum

  11. Libel Law • Defamation • Statement which is untrue that would expose a private person to ridicule or contempt • Libel • Written defamation • Slander • Spoken defamation

  12. New York Times v. Sullivan • Committee to Defend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. bought a full page ad in the New York Times • In early 1960, Dr. King was arrested for perjury on his income tax • Charges were politically motivated harassment by officials of Montgomery, Alabama • He was acquitted of all charges • Times sued by L. B. Sullivan, supervisor of police and fire department in Montgomery, Alabama • U.S. Supreme Court held • Times did not act with actual malice • Public official must show the defendant acted with knowledge of statement’s falsity or with reckless disregard • Times did not libel Sullivan

  13. Defining the Sullivan Decision • Gertz v. Robert Welch • Expand definition of public official to include public figures • Private persons must only show that the statement was false • Public fugues must prove actual malice • Herbert v. Lando • Court may explore a reporter’s state of mind while writing a story • Use the pretrial discovery process • Reporters must surrender notes and identify sources • Masson v. New Yorker Magazine • Reporter had misquoted psychoanalyst Jeffery Masson • Court held that changes in the quote did not libel Masson

  14. To Prove Libel • Statement communicated to a third party • Statement injured a person’s reputation • Loss of income or caused mental anguish • Identify the person • Journalist, print or broadcast organization is at fault

  15. Defense for Libel • Truth • Truth is the best defense against libel • Andrew Hamilton’s defense of John Peter Zenger • Privileged • Report what was said during legislative and court proceedings • Even if what a witness says is not true • Qualified privilege • Fair comment • Movie, theatre and restaurant criticism • Opinion can not be proven true or false

  16. Today’s Libel Laws • Carol Burnett • Nation Inquirer reported she got drunk and threw a drink on Secretary of State Henry Kissinger • Report was untrue • Jury awarded $1.6 million reduced on appeal to $150,000 • Most libel judgements are reversed or reduced on appeal • Only 10% of libel cases are won • High cost of legal fees has produced self-censorshipby the media

  17. Libel Law Reform • Attorney Floyd Abrams has proposed three reforms for libel law • Print corrections quickly • When timely corrections are made no lawsuit would be allowed • Damage should be limited to amount lost • Emotional injury limited to $100,000 • Court should require the losing side pay legal fees of the winning side • Discourage frivolous libel suits

  18. Privacy Law • Public believes that invasion of privacy is one of the media’s worst faults • Privacy from the press is ethical as well as legal • Media invades privacy in four ways • Intruding on a person’s solitude • Media may not take a photo in a private place without permission • Disclosure of embarrassing personal facts • Placing a person in a false light • Fictional version of actual events • Right of Publicity • Using someone’s name or picture for commercial benefit

  19. Intruding on a Person’s Solitude • Media can photograph or question a person in a public place • On a public street • Media may not take a photo in a private place without permission • Media may not pursue a person unnecessarily • Galella v. Onassis • Jacqueline Onassis, widow of assassinated President John F. Kennedy • Sued photographer Ron Galella for pursuing her and her children • Galella ordered to stay 25 feed away from Mrs. Onassis and 30 feet away form the Kennedy children

  20. Disclosure of Embarrassing Facts • Facts used in a story should be newsworthy • A public official caught travailing with his/her paramour in public • Information about the paramour is important to the story • A public official discovered to have caught AIDS from his/her paramour • Information about the paramour is not essential to the story • Identity of the paramour could be protected by privacy law • Public records are not considered private • Court proceedings and congressional debates • Privacy laws give little protection to public figures • Bartnicki v. Vopper • Information gathered through illegal condescend means and given to the media by a third party • Media has the right to report information in the public’s interest

  21. Right of Publicity • Using someone’s name or picture for commercial benefit • Important in advertising and public relations • “Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets” • Advertised the portable toilets with the phrase “The World's Foremost Commodian” • Violated Johnny Carson’s right of publicity • Did not have permission and was not paid to use his name • Michigan court held that the company misappropriated Carson’s name • This right continues even after a person dies • Family of well known entertainer’s control how their likeness and name may be used

  22. Fair Trial and Right of Access • Fair Trial • Press coverage can interfere with the right to a fair trial • Sheppard v. Maxwell • Trial of Dr. Sam Sheppard for murdering his wife • Media coverage biased the jury • Courtroom Access • A judge excludes the press from the courtroom • Gag orders on press coverage • Courts have overturned most limitations on press coverage • Camera in the courtroom • Court TV broadcast of the entire trial of O.J. Simpson • Media can disrupt court proceedings • State by state decision • Federal courts do not permit cameras in the court room

  23. Regulating Broadcasting • Regulation as an attempt to organize the airwaves • Based on the concept that broadcasters are trustees operating in the public interest • U.S. broadcast stations must be licensed to operate • Government has more control over broadcast media than print media • Federal Communication Commission • Oversees broadcasting • Has five members appointed by the president • Approved by the Senate • Five year terms • Established by the Radio Act of 1912 • Originally named the Federal Radio Commission • Federal Trade Commission • Regulates advertising

  24. Advertising Regulations • Central Hudson Case • Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission • New York public utility commission prohibited advertising that promoted the use of electricity • Supreme Court held that government could not regulate commercial speech • If an advertisement does not mislead and concerns lawful activity • Federal Trade Commission (FTC) • Five members for seven year terms • To stop deceptive advertising staff may seek • Letter of compliance from advertiser • Consent agreement written by an administrative law judge • Cease and desist order issued by the Commission

More Related