1 / 21

The Character of the Short-Term Variability of Sagittarius A* from the Radio to the Near-Infrared

The Character of the Short-Term Variability of Sagittarius A* from the Radio to the Near-Infrared. and even to X-rays. Mark Morris, Andrea Ghez, Seth Hornstein, Jessica Lu & Keith Matthews UCLA. and Fred Baganoff (MIT). Outline. Sgr A* variability: mm, cm, submm Hourly time scales

thanos
Download Presentation

The Character of the Short-Term Variability of Sagittarius A* from the Radio to the Near-Infrared

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Character of the Short-Term Variability of Sagittarius A* from the Radio to the Near-Infrared and even to X-rays Mark Morris, Andrea Ghez, Seth Hornstein, Jessica Lu & Keith Matthews UCLA and Fred Baganoff (MIT)

  2. Outline • Sgr A* variability: mm, cm, submm • Hourly time scales • Near-IR variability properties • Spectral index invariance • Hourly time scales • “simultaneous” observations of a recent X-ray flare • The question of quasi-periodicities • summary

  3. Bondi radius,

  4. RADIO 3-mm light curves from theOwens Valley MillimeterInterferometer(Mauerhan et al. 2004) Note the excess power at2-3 hours. Simulated red noise curves of variousslopes.

  5. Centimeter-wave variability of SgrA* (Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2006):- note few hour time scale - low-amplitude - phase lag --> expanding plasmon model

  6. SMA variability (890 µm) (from Eckart et al. 2006, observations by Marrone, Moran, Zhao)

  7. Polarized light curves from the SMA @ 230 GHz (Marrone, Moran et al.):note the power on few-hour time scales ….. Polarization evolution in theQ-U plane.

  8. Near-infrared variability: almost an order of magnitude on an hour time scale.

  9. HK’L’ color composite 1” Hornstein et al. 2006

  10. Peak 1 Peak 2 Peak 3 K’-L’ K’-L’ (July 2004) Rapid-switching, broad-band photometry with Keck/NIRC2during July 2005 (2 nights) L’ 3.8 K’ 2.2 µmH 1.6 µm L’ 3.8 µmMs 4.7 µm K’-L’ F =  Hornstein et al. 2006

  11. Contamination by the underlying stellar population Spectral Slopes Spectral indices from uncorrected SgrA* fluxes (obtained from PSF fitting) Spectral indices obtained after subtraction of smallest SgrA* flux, to correct forcontamination by the unresolved, centrally peaked stellar population.

  12. These results are consistent withIR = -0.9 ± 0.3 for all pairs of wavelengths at all times. • ==> working hypothesis: the spectral index of the IR emission is constant over intensity, time, and wavelength (1 - 5 µm).This differs from the cm-wave radio result. Conclude: no spectral evolution during the outburst. The “flare” mechanism leaves the energy distribution of the bulk of the IR-emitting electrons unchanged. 1 - 3 hour time scales: dynamical time at 20-30 Rsor recurrence time of an instability, such as the RossbyWave Instability (Tagger & Melia 2006).

  13. No X-ray activity during the time of the measured events.It would be extremely important to make this measurement during an X-ray flare to see if the spectral slope changes then.If not --> different electron population needed for X-rays.

  14. 2002 – 23-30 May CXO light curve (2-8 keV)Baganoff et al. May 28 15:36 UT 25x, 4 ks May 29 06:03 UT 12x, 7 ks May 29 18:33 UT 13x, 2 ks On average, ~ 1 X-ray flare / 105 seconds; compare to near-IR (L’) -- ~10 broad maxima / day

  15. SimultaneousIR/X-ray/submmobservation,2006 July 17 Keck II/ NIRC2Hornstein et al.

  16. X-ray flare Sgr A* 230 GHz X-ray Time --> Submillimeter Array (SMA) light curve(Marrone, Moran et al. ) Sgr A* near-IR Keck dataHornstein et al.

  17.  = -0.54, or within 1- of the2005 value of -0.9. The near-IR spectral index shows no change during the fall of thelight curve following the X-ray flare, and during the rise of the sub-mm. ==> inconsistent with an expansion process, as might have beensuggested by the time lag between X-rays and sub-mm.

  18. 15 - 22 minute periodicities in IR & X? Context: period of innermost stable circular orbit around a 3.6 x 106 M BH is 28 min (a=0) 17 min (a=0.5), where 0 < a  1 is the dimensionless rotation parameter. Belanger et al. 2005: P ~ 22 min (XMM flare) Genzel et al. 2004: P ~ 17 minutes, 2.2 µm Relatively rare -- never seen at Keck. Only structured flare in ~20 now seen

  19. Hornstein et al. A good example of a Keck light curve (3 hours at 3.8 µm), simultaneous with Chandra, but with no X-ray activity above the quiescent level.

  20. Summary • 1. There have been exciting hints of quasi-periodic variability at periods related to the ISCO, but IMHO, more work remains to be done to really establish: • the frequency of occurrence of periodic signals • the range of periods (presumably not all located at the ISCO) • the temporal coherence length of a periodic signal • whether a “chirp” phenomenon can be demonstrated for a distribution of cases, and whether dP/dt is roughly constant • Polarization studies at both submillimeter and near-IR wavelengths appear to be very promising for elucidating theorbital motion.

  21. 2. There is an apparent excess of power on time scales of a few hours at millimeter, submillimeter, and infrared wavelengths. • dynamical time scale? (R ~ 25Rs) or instability recurrence time? • the near-infrared spectrum does not evolve as the intensity undergoes strong changes. • 3. In the near-IR, the variability is essentially continuous, at least at 3.8 µm: • not a succession of “flares” but rather a stochastically varying intensity • At 2 µm, the peaks have often been interpreted as discrete events, perhaps because the background level is more difficult to define there.

More Related