1 / 10

Subject indexing and classification

Towards a Norwegian general thesaurus? Unni Knutsen, Humanities and Social Sciences Library Mari Lundevall , Science Library. Subject indexing and classification. Report from working group (2010): Lack of coordination across (and within) faculties:

Download Presentation

Subject indexing and classification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Towards a Norwegian general thesaurus?Unni Knutsen, Humanities and Social Sciences LibraryMari Lundevall, Science Library

  2. Subject indexing and classification Report from working group (2010): • Lack of coordination across (and within) faculties: • Uncontrolled index terms, controlled index terms, two thesauri: Humord (humanities and social sciences) and MESH • 7 different classification schemes (including DDC and NLM Classification) • Resource constraints

  3. Recommendations • Use established subject indexing systems • Extend Humord to include most of the subject areas in the library • In addition: MESH • Do away with in-house classification schemes, use DDC and NLM Classification

  4. More about Humord • A thesaurus (humanities and social sciences) • 26 000 concepts • In addition the name of a joint indexing activity within the framework of the shared catalogue – BIBSYS • Cooperation and reuse of indexing data • Consistent use of indexing terms based on common indexing rules

  5. National Library of Norway • Report from working group: • Various in-house subject indexing systems • Lack of coordination • Lack of standardized subject indexing systems • Tested data from various sources. Conclusion: Use of Humord gave the best result

  6. So we joined forces… • The University of Oslo Library received funds for 2014 to: • Participate in a study with the National Library to explore the feasibility of developing a more general, national thesaurus based on Humord and the controlled vocabulary for natural sciences and mathematics • Develop methods of mapping from Humord to WebDewey

  7. Realfagstermer • Controlled vocabulary for natural sciences and mathematics • 14 000 concepts • Synonym control • Related terms • English (10%), some Latin • Subject strings

  8. Mapping attempts • Target: the on-going Norwegian DDC-translation • 500-group, 600-640 • Computer assisted direct matching: Mapping suggestions based on string matching from our terms to DDC captions • Co-occurrence mapping: Mapping suggestions based on co-existing DDC and subject terms in catalogue records

  9. Term in sourcevocabulary Term in target vocabulary μmapper Example

More Related