1 / 30

Ohio’s Connecting to Collections Project

Ohio’s Connecting to Collections Project. Statewide Preservation Survey Findings. Tom Clareson May 7, 2010. Survey Demographics. In field January-March 2010 Project Partners’ and Regional Representatives’ assistance helpful 285 responses – 40% return rate

Download Presentation

Ohio’s Connecting to Collections Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ohio’s Connecting to Collections Project Statewide Preservation Survey Findings Tom Clareson May 7, 2010

  2. Survey Demographics • In field January-March 2010 • Project Partners’ and Regional Representatives’ assistance helpful • 285 responses – 40% return rate • Top institution types responding: • Public libraries • Historical Societies • Academic libraries • Museums

  3. Preservation Activities –What’s Being Done Currently • Rehousing (incl. refoldering, reboxing) • Reformatting (preservation photocopying, microfilming) • Storage furniture • Environmental monitoring • Digitization/imaging • Exhibit policies • Pest and mold management

  4. PreservationPolicies • The list of “what needs to be done” • Survey found: • Lack of written long-range preservation plans • Lack of onsite preservation surveys performed • Written policies and procedures, disaster plans both lacking • This is a national problem! Potential solutions: provide model plans and policies; policies as workshop outcomes; consulting

  5. A Major Concern • Survey asked how much of your institution’s collection you would estimate is adequately stored • 38 institutions (14.6%) said none • 90 respondents (36.6%) said only 1-25% • 51 organizations (19.6%) said 26-50% • 70% of respondents (179 institutions) feel that half or less of their collections are stored well

  6. Most SeriousPreservationProblems • Top Answers from the “Top Three” question: • Lack of funds for preservation supplies, staff, and activities • Lack of space (storage/exhibit space) • Environmental issues (temp & rh fluctuations, lack of temp & rh control, lack of monitoring, lighting issues) • Lack of staff or staff time for preservation activities • Lack of proper storage (facilities or containers/materials) • Need for digitization of collection items • Lack of long-term preservation plan or policies

  7. Environmental Controls and Fire Safety • Temperature and light levels most often controlled • Humidity and air quality controlled less often • Fire detection good; suppression poor

  8. Disaster Situations • 90 respondents have had disasters (one-third of respondents) • Disasters were caused by: • Water leakage • Flooding • Mold outbreaks • Pests • Internal staff took care of recovery

  9. Disaster Planning • 48% have no disaster plan • 13% have plan • 20% have a plan, but it hasn’t been updated in a year or more • 14% are developing • Two meanings of this finding! • Security practices well-developed • 82%+ have a working relationship with local first responders and emergency managers

  10. Preservation Service Interest • Biggest areas of interest • State-supported preservation grants • State-sponsored preservation workshops • Source to contact for preservation information • On-site visits by preservation professionals • Assistance with disaster planning and recovery

  11. Potential StatewideContract Services • Disaster recovery assistance • Preservation supplies • Electronic data storage • Collections storage

  12. Preservation Training • Leading educational resources • On-site visits • Print materials • Videos, DVDs • Barriers to training • Travel costs • Registration costs • Unavailable in region • Potential solutions: Workshop series available in multiple regions; distance education

  13. Preservation Training II • Formats on which training needed (ranked) • Books/bound volumes • Photographic collections* • Digital materials and electronic records • Unbound sheets * Highest URGENT need cited

  14. Preservation Training III • Disaster preparedness and conservation seen as popular areas of need • Preservation management and digitization also seen as high-level training needs • Potential solution: develop or adopt curriculum to be offered at many sites

  15. Key Findings -- Funding • Majority received preservation funding from institution’s own budget (positive or negative?) • Only 1/3 have made grant applications in the past 5 years • Important external preservation funding sources: Donors, County grants; foundations • Those not applying lack time to complete grants; need more project planning assistance; lack information about funding sources; • This is an area where assistance and education is needed

  16. Some “Untapped” Grant Sources • National Endowment for the Humanities Preservation Assistance Grants for Smaller Institutions (NEH/PAG) • NEH – Larger Program Grants • National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) • Save America’s Treasures (SAT)* • National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC)

  17. NEH Preservation Assistance Grants • Awards: up to $6,000 • Activities: • general preservation or conservation assessments • consultants to develop a plan to address a specific preservation problem (now including digital preservation) • attendance at preservation workshops/training programs • purchase of preservation supplies, equipment, and storage furniture • purchase of environmental monitoring equipment • 2010 Deadline: May 18

  18. Other NEH Grants to Consider • Sustaining Cultural Heritage Collections* • Grants to Preserve and Create Access to Humanities Collections • Preservation and Access Research and Development Project Grants • Challenge Grants • Statewide or Collaborative Projects

  19. Preservation Staffing Scenarios • Duties assigned as needed • No staff person with preservation/conservation responsibilities • Part-time or full-time staff dedicated to preservation • Volunteers providing services • About 80% with no formal pres/cons training

  20. Digital Findings • Photographs, video/audio, databases, and sound recordings are the formats most often acquired/owned in digital format • Scanning/conversion done most on photographs, documents, manuscripts, maps • Digital preservation plans needed, starting with more backup plans/policies • Those with backup files are storing them offsite (Good, in light of Hurricane Katrina findings), but only three miles away.

  21. Estimates of Formats Held • Books and bound volumes – 26 million • Photographs – 11 million • Digital material online collections – 5 million • Archaeological collections – 3 million • Moving image collections – 2 million • Recorded sound collections – 1.2 million • These numbers from only 40% of identified repositories in the State

  22. Comments from the Surveys • “In most of the smaller museums, the awareness of the preservation/conservation of the collection is not a high priority.” • “Please do not overlook or forget about the many, many small museums/sites with little or no funds to properly house their items. There are a great deal of volunteer organizations wanting to take proper care of their collections but have neither the knowledge or funding to make that possible.”

  23. Comments from the Surveys • “We have so many original historical records that need preservation/conservation that it is hard to decide where to even begin. We have no budget to speak of and would greatly benefit from a professional needs assessment survey.” • “We have more to do than we have funding or expertise to do….” • “We often have questions as to what to keep and probably tend to keep more than we need.” • “We are having trouble getting all our collections and memorabilia inventory completed in a timely manner so our museum can use them.”

  24. Comments from the Surveys • “MONEY is the big problem, not just now (economy) but all the time for us.” • “We need assistance with preservation as well as ways to learn how to find and write grants.” • “I…lack experience in filling out grants and find it a little overwhelming.”

  25. Comments from the Surveys • “Our parent institution ... does not support our interest in archival preservation of library materials.” • “It has been impossible to convince our local government officials to address our needs as there is just not any local money to be spared at this time.” • “It would be great to have literature … that could be shared with management letting them know the importance of best practices and guidelines for museum collections.”

  26. Comments from the Surveys • “When we (were) forced to confront our preservation issues after a mold outbreak, we floundered about for guidance and help to deal with our problem. Having one statewide, centralized source to provide help would have been an incredible relief.” • “Having a mutual aid agreement with nearby cultural heritage institutions would be a huge positive step forward. Having this paired with a repository of disaster supplies that all in this mutual aid agreement could draw from would also be greatly beneficial.”

  27. Comments from the Surveys • “I would avidly welcome the opportunity for more (preservation) training workshops.” • “We need to be able to train volunteers in the basics of preservation … things we can do on a shoestring budget.” • “Cooperative preservation planning and pooling resources would be desirable.”

  28. Comments from the Surveys • “Without outside help, we will not be able to adequately preserve our collection for future generations.” • “Where do you get interested people with time?” • We need help ... where does one start?”

  29. Conclusions • Develop a cohesive curriculum of preservation training • Make workshops available in many regions of the State • Preservation policy development needed • Lack of storage space is a top problem • Raise awareness of and education on preservation funding resources • High interest levels in training, collaborative preservation initiatives, state-supported preservation activities, and state contracts • Programmatic need – coordinated outreach

  30. Questionsand Discussion Contact: Tom Clareson tom.clareson@lyrasis.org 800/233-3401, x1270; 614/439-1796

More Related