1 / 19

Application of IR Theories to the Geopolitical Changes in the Danubian Region Ivan DIMITROV

Workshop 4: New Geopolitical Era for CEECs ? The Danubian Region in IR 2 0 Years after the Fall of the Iron Curtain. Application of IR Theories to the Geopolitical Changes in the Danubian Region Ivan DIMITROV. Theory as a tool of political science

thetis
Download Presentation

Application of IR Theories to the Geopolitical Changes in the Danubian Region Ivan DIMITROV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workshop 4:New GeopoliticalEraforCEECs?The DanubianRegionin IR 20 Years after the Fall of the Iron Curtain

  2. Application of IR Theories to the Geopolitical Changes in the Danubian Region Ivan DIMITROV

  3. Theory as a tool of political science • To what extent IR theories are applicable to CEECs • Major challenges: • West – East reorientation of foreign policy in the CEECs • Democratisation of the society • Liberalisation & economic transformation • Inadequacies for explaining the course of events

  4. Basic elements of the actual regional security environment within CEE Georgeta CHIRLESAN Dumitru CHIRLESAN

  5. Goals: • Make a comparative analysis of NSS in 5 CEECs and search convergence with the ESS • Focus on current & future security environment in the CEECs • Levels of analysis: • evolution • When these documents were issued & adopted • Adoption mechanisms • Precursory documents • Connection with the moment of receiving the invitation to join NATO • Analysis of the documents’ structure • The content of the strategy

  6. Conclusions of the survey: • Althoughsimilarities, particularities and differenceswereidentifiedinrelationtothefivesecuritystrategies, theauthors maintainthatthere is a goodcompatibility of theanalyseddocuments, a commonviewinapproachingthesecurityissues and theways of ensuringitatnational and regionallevel The fivecountriesdescribethesame major threats – terrorism, theproliferation of WMDs, regionalconflicts, failedstates and non-democraticregimes, organizedcrimes, theyshare a commonvision of theinternationalorderwhich is basedoneffectivemultilateralism, theyallplace NATO ont he firstplaceinensuringthecollectivedefence

  7. Besides, the coherence with the ESS is a solid one: HU, CZ and SK have NSS which are profoundly coherent with the ESS, the nuances appearing only to those component which do not contradict the EU idea of security. Although PL and RO developed in a different manner their security documents, they are spinning on similar orbits around the ESS. • the five states analysed in the present study have security strategy with common and also divergent elements. • the common denominator conferring them the characteristic of a distinct group is given by their vision upon the preferred international order

  8. the international legislation must reflect the changes in the character of the threats to security, must be adapted to the new changes; • the role of the UN Security Council is seen as important but not as primordial or major; • NATO is considered the most important security guarantor. By taking into account both the common points and also those in which the five strategies are divergent, the authors highlight that basically the five documents reflect the same general vision on the concept of security, with “soft” and “hard” accents, depending on the regional context elements.

  9. Visegrad Group – an experience of regional cooperation in CEECs Roland NACSA

  10. Structure: a cooperative forum • Main objective: to enhance integration to European institutions (EU and NATO). Once achieved, it had to be redefined • Importance: • sub-regional cooperation • Convergences & Divergences • Opportunities • Enhanced cooperation may decrease the need to big States of the EU • An example for Danube region?

  11. Ethnic relations in Romania: The prospects for a new accommodation Vassilis PETSINIS

  12. Since the late 90s, the politics of interest seem to have superseded the politics of ID in Romanian political discourse. This development has resulted from a combination of catalysts, internal as well as external. With regard to the former, the popular mistrust towards Romania’s mainstream parties has often prevented these parties from forming a majority government in their own right. This prompted their leaderships to assess the prospects for alliances with smaller political actors, including the Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (DUHR).

  13. Meanwhile, the DUHR leadership started viewing their entrance to the halls of power as a good opportunity to realise, at least, their main aims. As part of the whole process, both sides have opted for a milder approach to the relations between the Romanian state and the Hungarian minority. As far as the external catalysts are concerned, the impact of Romania’s entrance to the EU has been critical upon releasing the tensions between Romanians and ethnic Hungarians.

  14. These processes, at the elite level, have been facilitated by certain social realities in these areas where Romanians and ethnic Hungarians coexist. In Transylvania, there may not exist an articulate notion of regional ID. Nevertheless, the awareness of a shared regional heritage seems to have established some common values and provided a common cultural substratum for Romanians and ethnic Hungarians. In an overall assessment, it would not be an exaggeration to speak, at least temporarily, of a ‘Romanian success’ in the field of managing the ethnic relations.

  15. Water ways: 20 years of the close cooperation in Danube region Victoriia Liepkova

  16. Marine Strategy for the EU • Vital environment component of the future maritime policy • objectives: • Protect more effectively the marine environment in Europe • Achieve good environmental status of the EU’s marine waters

  17. Importance of the strategy: • Establishment of European marine regions on the basis of geographical and environmental criteria • All member States are required to develop strategies for their marine waters (and cooperate) • These strategies may help the definition of good environmental status at regional level

  18. Reviews of the strategy will help countries: • To improve their management of the environment by establishing baseline conditions and recommending better policy implementation and performance; • To promote continuous dialogue between states by sharing information on their policies and experiences; • To stimulate greater involvement of the public in environmental discussions and decision-making

  19. In addition to continuing and intensifying the above-mentioned tasks, the Strategy will provide Danube region countries with the opportunity of continuously assess the need for further action in the environmental field, with a viw to contributing to cleaner Danube.

More Related