1 / 16

The Birmingham Disability Consortium

The Birmingham Disability Consortium. Mark MacPearson & Will Thornton Friday 6 May 2011. Managing Provider Model. The lead delivers SOME of the services The lead is the accountable body and issues sub-contracts to BDC members The lead takes a management fee

thetis
Download Presentation

The Birmingham Disability Consortium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Birmingham Disability Consortium • Mark MacPearson & Will Thornton Friday 6 May 2011

  2. Managing Provider Model • The lead delivers SOME of the services • The lead is the accountable body and issues sub-contracts to BDC members • The lead takes a management fee • Members submit an EOI to join a bid, or agree by committee on who delivers what

  3. Who are the BDC? • 7 local disability charities • Action – West Midlands • Midland Mencap • BITA Pathways • Birmingham Disability Resource Centre • BID Services • Birmingham Rathbone • Momentum

  4. Our Specialisms • Blind and Partially Sighted • Deaf and Hard of Hearing • Physical Disability • Mental ill Health • Severe Learning Disability • Mild Learning Disability • Acquired Brain Injury • Truly PAN DISABILITY

  5. How we knew each other We were already: • Working together informally • Members of BCC Welfare to Work AEG • Delivering services across Birmingham • Pooling resources on other projects • Combining skills and experience • BVSC events • Local networks

  6. How did we form? • BCC facilitated a meeting • We agreed a basic aim • We drafted a MoU • We set up a steering group and agreed eligibility criteria • We diarised a calendar of meetings • We formed an identity • The funding search began

  7. How the BDC works • Action leads and gives consortium financial stability • Not-for-profit status means all funding goes towards supporting our client groups • Peer group of specialists sharing best practice and referrals across the disability spectrum • Regular Management and Practitioner meetings ensure the quality of our provision • Formal SLA to ensure good governance

  8. Action’s role • Collate and present the bid • Single point of contact for BCC • Manage monthly claims • Manage payments to partners • Audit Quality of provision and records • Attend review meetings • Attend Local Provider Forums • Develop marketing via website and promotional materials • Deliver 10% of project outcomes

  9. Partner Role • Form Steering Group • Support the bidding process • Deliver the contract outcomes • Support BDC Managers meetings • Support BDC Practitioner meetings • Deliver local marketing and engagement • Feed information to Action, enter data on database, relay good news stories

  10. Our Success to Date • WNF in Birmingham • 7 Contracts • Up to £2.5 million over 18 months • Recognised as best practice model by BCC for these contracts • Presentations delivered through BVSC to third sector in Birmingham • Approached by Primes on DWP Framework for SWP, contracts offered

  11. Performance • SWOT Analysis • Strengths • Weaknesses • Opportunities • Threats

  12. Strengths • Trust and Transparency • Specialist Disability Provision • Geographical Coverage • Action as ‘Prime/Lead’ gave strong leadership • Partnership Approach to decision making • Management AND Practitioner meetings • Commitment and Flexibility of partners

  13. Weaknesses • Prime Resource allocation limit • Duplication of engagements at times • Require ALL partners to perrform • Only as strong as the weakest link • More difficult to build the brand

  14. Opportunities • A louder voice • Regional opportunity - Extending reach • Develop services from each other • New services eg Personalisation • Influencing and shaping agenda for commissioning • Develop Legal Status to SPV

  15. Threats • Legal Status for Primes • Lack of opportunity in new market • Increased competition • Lack of specialist disability contracts • Change of key individuals in partner organisations

  16. What we have learned • Transparency and trust are essential • Don’t push partners into gaps • Look for signs of weakness • Keep the communication going • Keep the Consortium tight • Only take new members to improve what you have, or fill identified gaps

More Related