1 / 50

Geopolitical issues

Geopolitical issues. Part III. Population displacements and migration. Session 5. Introduction. Throughout history, men have always migrated for environmental reasons But that ’ s also a reason largely ignored by researchers and policy makers. Despite growing concerns

thouse
Download Presentation

Geopolitical issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geopolitical issues Part III

  2. Population displacements and migration Session 5

  3. Introduction • Throughout history, men have always migrated for environmental reasons • But that’s also a reason largely ignored by researchers and policy makers. • Despite growing concerns • Linkage between environment and migration still controversial

  4. Historical examples

  5. The emergence of the concept • First mentioned in the 1970s • First UNEP report in 1985 • Growing interest in the mid-2000s: • Realisation of the impacts of climate change • Major natural disasters • Tsunami 2004 • Katrina 2005 • Pakistan earthquake 2005 > Confusion between displacements linked to climate change and other environmental degradation.

  6. A complex relationship • Migration itself is a very complex process Involves a wide array of factors, individual decision • Environmental factors are linked with economic, social and political factors When is environmental pressure the primary factor? • Environmental disruption can be a cause and a consequence of migration Resource scarcity, ‘green’ conflicts,... • Migration can also help to reduce the presure on resources

  7. Which impacts of climate change can lead to displacements?

  8. 1. Sea-level riseCoastal regions will be first and most affected A sea-level rise of 1cm puts 1 million people at risk of displacement Source: NASA

  9. 2. Droughts and land degradation • Impacts on migration difficult to forecast • Migration flows tend to decrease at the peak of droughts • That’s because households affect their resources to primary needs.

  10. 3. Extreme meteorological events

  11. Characteristics of the migrants • Positive relationshipbetweenenvironmentaldegradation and migration. • Differentfactorsintermingle, but environmentalfactors are of growing importance. • Definitional issue • Thesefactorsincrease the constraints to migration • Rise in forced migration • Migration flows are ofteninternal, and happening on short distances • Affected countries bear all the burden of migration. • The mostvulnerable are oftenunable to migrate. • Migration isexpensive

  12. Issue of the definition • Difficult • Mostly internal migration • Mingles with other factors • Controversial • Alarmists vs sceptics • A broad definition invites large numbers • Different agendas • Wide variety of terms (often misnomers) • Important • Policy-wise • Allows to forecast numbers

  13. A disconnection from the realities of migration • Migrants are seen as expiatory, resourceless victims of climate change. • Many of them don’t consider themselves as victims, or don’t want to be considered as such. • Migrants are resourceful agents – they are not the most vulnerable • Migration is perceived as an adaptation failure • In many cases, it can be an adaptation strategy • We assume a direct, causal relationship between climate change and migration. • We expect that these displacements will be forced and international. • We assume that the nature and extent of the migration flows will depend upon the impacts of climate change. • Environmental determinism • Climate-induced migration often perceived as a threat to security. • In many cases, it can actually improve human security.

  14. London Futures, exhibition at the Museum of London

  15. Example 1Tuvalu

  16. Key facts about Tuvalu • Successfully marketed itself as a country at risk of being washed away by sea-level rise, sending out the first ‘climate change refugees’ • Archipelago of nine islands, five of them are coral atolls. • Around 9,500 inhabitants; 4,500 live on the main atoll, Funafuti. • 26 km2, one of the world’s highest population density (373, but 1,610 in Funafuti) • Highest point at 4 m above sea-level

  17. Tuvalu’s economy • Only resources are stamps, « .tv » internet domain and fishing licences • Wholly artificial economy, entirely dependant upon international aid (trust fund, remittances, etc.) • Very few jobs and high unemployment rate

  18. Climate change • Major concern amongst inhabitants, fear of a brutal tsunami or hurricane • Extreme vulnerability to sea-level rise

  19. Effects of climate change difficult to assess • Lack of scientific data about sea-level rise, no measurements • People rely on anecdotal evidence, oral environmental history • King tides every year, in February-March

  20. King tides

  21. Other environmental issues • Overpopulation • Waste disposal • ‘Borrow pits’ • Lack of drinkable water • Soil salinity

  22. Migration • Important internal migration, from outer islands to Funafuti • About 3,000 Tuvaluans living in Auckland • Forced or voluntary migration? Issue of timescale • The whole region is highly prone to migration, part of Polynesian lifestyle • New Zealand is the only possible destination: • Pacific Access Category • Seasonal labour scheme

  23. Resettlement • Considered many times in Tuvalu’s history • In 1890s, suggested as a solution to overpopulation problem • Population of Funafuti relocated on an outer island by Americans during WWII • Purchase of the island of Kioa in 1951 • Repeated plea by the government, in relation to climate change • However, works by John Campbell (Waikato U.) show difficulties in community relocation

  24. Expatriates in Auckland • About 3,000 Tuvaluans living in West Auckland • NZ Government supporting some aspects of cultural life • Some weight in national and local politics • ‘Pull’ factor of migration

  25. Government’s dilemmas • Adapt or flee? Role of the state is crucial • The government is actually encouraging emigration - ‘We want to give people a choice before it is too late’ • But also needs to keep attracting international aid • Preparing resettlement would clash with population’s views

  26. Do people move because of climate change? • Wide range of factors: • Family and social networks in New Zealand • Job opportunities, better wages • Only the wealthier can afford to migrate • ... And concerns about sea-level rise • Key factor: uncertainty about the future, that acts as a trigger.

  27. Uncertainty and futurity • People do not migrate for themselves, but for their children - some of them born in New Zealand • Concerns about the future of Tuvalu seem more important than actual degradations of the environment • Issue of uncertainty and futurity • Migration as a risk-reduction strategy for the family

  28. Example 2Katrina

  29. Basic facts • One of the worst disasters in US history: • About 2,000 fatalities • 75 % of homes in New Orleans destroyed • 1,200,000 people evacuated on the Gulf Coast • US$ 85 billion damage • Disaster mainly due to the levee breaches • One quarter of New Orleans population without car • Help didn’t arrive before Setember 3rd, four days after the disaster

  30. Evacuation • Mandatory evacuation ordered by Mayor Nagin on August 28. • Overall quite successful: 85 % evacuated • About 60,000 were stranded in the city • Because they had no car • Because they were ill, old, or disabled • Because they had pets • Because they didn’t know where to go • Because they were unwilling to leave

  31. Evacuation patterns • Extremely diversified • Some people traveled very far away, others stayed relatively close. • Some traveled on their own, others were evacuated. • Some stayed with friends/relatives, others stayed in hotels/rented properties • Some could choose where they were going, others not • And some did not move at all. > The perception of the evacuation was also very diverse.

  32. Three conclusions > Despite the collective dimension of the tragedy, the evacuation process was an individual process. > Forced or voluntary migration? People’s perceptions are very different. > The most vulnerable were far less off

  33. Most vulnerable were far less off • Many were stranded in the city. • Those evacuated had no choice of their destination • This affected their ability to cope while away • Tend to blame Government and FEMA more severely. • Issue of adaptability > Katrina was also, and maybe most of all, a social disaster.

  34. Return • Also very diverse patterns: some returned quickly, others after some time, others not at all. • Only about half of the population has returned to the city: • 37 % live in Louisiana • 34 % live in Texas (mostly Houston) • 9 % live in Georgia (mostly Atlanta) • 20 % live in another state • Only 11 % plan to return • 52 % are certain they will not return • Migration rather than displacement

  35. Exemple 3 - Fukushima

  36. Evacuation zones (22 Apr – 30 Sep 2011) (30 Sep 2011 - present) Deliberate Evacuation Area Deliberate Evacuation Area Specific Spots Recommended for Evacuation Restricted Area Restricted Area Specific Spots Recommended for Evacuation Evacuation-Prepared Area

  37. Trauma and tensions

  38. http://www.devast-project.org

  39. Policy responses: Different directions • Environmental policies • Rapid evolution since the 1990s • People displaced by natural disasters and/or climate change increasingly taken into account • New actors and structures: IASC, CCEMA, rise of adaptation in climate talks • New instruments: • Hyogo Framework • Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters • Adaptation Funds > Climate negotiations often considered as the central policy forum with regard to environmental migration

  40. Migration and asylum policies • Have not really taken into account environmental factors so far • Very little progress in the governance of migration, no new instruments • Exception: temporary protection status • Two points to consider: • Traditional theories of migration are environmentally-blind • Migration scholars have a lesser impact on policy design than environmental scholars

  41. Legal matters • People displaced by climate change are not refugees, according to the 1951 Geneva Convention: • No political persecution • But isn’t climate change a violent, political persecution to the most vulnerable? • Not always a border crossing • The displaced people flee their livelihood, not always their country • Forced migration? • Climate change adds a new dimension to the traditional distinction between forced and voluntary migration.

  42. Two key policy issues • Enabling the right to leave • Enabling the right to choose • This will require different policy shifts: • Going beyond humanitarian aid • Not discriminating between displacements associated with climate change and those that are not. • Not restricting oneself to refugee law (Hyogo Framework, etc.) • Not focusing only on those who leave, but also one those who stay, sometimes forcibly.

  43. Enabling the right to leave A challenge of migration policy • The right to leave is the key condition of asylum, originating after the Peace of Westphalia. • This right is currently jeopardised by environmental change. • The most vulnerable often find themselves unable to leave • Because they don’t have the resources to do so • Because of barriers to migration • Their life, health and livelihood are directly exposed to danger • Migration as a risk-reduction strategy • Issue of pro-active population displacements

  44. Enabling the right to chooseA challenge of adaptation policy • Many of the migrants are forced migrants, and many of the stayers are forced stayers. • Adaptation • In the origin region, adaptation will reduce the environmental constraints to migration. • Migration itself can be an adaptation strategy. • Adaptation will also be needed in the destination regions. • Adaptation and disaster-risk reduction • Burden-sharing and internationalisation of the costs. • No discrimination between climate change and other disasters.

More Related