1 / 42

Managing Conflict in the Patient Care Setting

Managing Conflict in the Patient Care Setting. Keri T. Holmes- Maybank , MD Medical University of South Carolina June 18, 2013. Learning Objectives. Review the famous Groves article “Taking care of the hateful patient.”

titus
Download Presentation

Managing Conflict in the Patient Care Setting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Managing Conflict in the Patient Care Setting Keri T. Holmes-Maybank, MD Medical University of South Carolina June 18, 2013

  2. Learning Objectives • Review the famous Groves article “Taking care of the hateful patient.” • Recognize physician characteristics that lead to a greater perception of a patient as “difficult.” • Recognize patient characteristics and patterns of behavior classified as “difficult.” • Practice the collaboration, appropriate use of power, and empathy approach recommended for managing conflict by Elder.

  3. Key Messages • Illness can alter the patient’s psyche leading to uncharacteristic behavior. • Acknowledge and accept emotional responses to patients. • Physician awareness and acceptance of personal emotions may improve emotional intelligence and physician-patient relationships. • Most important is how the physician behaves toward the patient, not the emotion she is experiencing. • Empathy and collaboration are the keys to effective conflict management.

  4. Groves “Hateful” Patient • Dependent Clinger • Entitled Demander • Manipulative Help Rejecter • Self Destructive Denier

  5. Dependent Clingers • Appropriate need for reassurance • Escalates to unreasonable, BOTTOMLESS need for explanation, affection, and attention • Constant reassurance • Increasing dependency • See MD as inexhaustible resource • Warning signs: • Extreme gratitude • MD feels special

  6. Dependent Clinger – MD Feelings • MD becomes exhausted, patient feels rejected, ramp up needy behavior with more desperate attempts at contact • Repugnance • Dislike • AVERSION

  7. Dependent Clinger - Suggestions • Empathy • Set limits early without feeling inhuman, without patient feeling deceived or disappointed • Difficult to refer to psychiatrist • Interpret as abandonment/rejection • Reassure you will still see them

  8. Entitled Demander • Overtly hostile, superior • Intimidation, devaluation, induce guilt • Control by threatening punishments • Withholding payment, demands for more tests/consults, or litigation • Lack of control • Compensation for MD power/knowledge • Ultimately fear abandonment • Entitlement = faith and hope in well-adjusted

  9. Entitled Demander – MD Feelings • Fear • Depression • Wish to counterattack

  10. Entitled Demander - Suggestions • Do NOT debate or belittle • Acknowledge entitlement to have realistic good care • Very respectfully and non-confrontationally to explain how behavior may compromise health • Cooperative decision-making process • Rechannel energy into following the regimen

  11. Manipulative Help Rejectors • Smugly satisfied with failure • Do not want cure, want unending relationship with MD • No regimen will help • Pessimism increases with MD’s efforts and enthusiasm • Manipulation • Want MD close but keep them at significant distance - fear • Relationship will not end if they have symptoms • Deny assistance/advice while spiraling into poor health

  12. Manipulative Help Rejecter – MD Feelings • Anxiety treatable illness being missed, then irritation, then depression and self-doubt • Guilty • Inadequate • Demoralized • Depression • Unproductive, time-consuming, exhausting

  13. Manipulative Help Rejecter - Suggestions • Don’t accuse of manipulation = doctor shopping • Share pessimism – say treatment may not be curative • Consistent, firm limitations – unrealistic expectations or demands • Regular follow-up • Patient’s fear of abandonment put to rest

  14. Manipulative Help Rejecters - Suggestions • Simple explanations • Hard to refer to psychiatrist • Make sure they have follow-up with MD • Empathy • Patient education • Encouragement and support

  15. Self-Destructive Denier • Unconscious self-murderous/injurious behaviors • Spiral of self-destruction while requesting assistance • Glory own destruction • Pleasure in defeating MD attempts to preserve life • Profoundly dependent • Self-hate, project hate through the MD

  16. Self-Destructive Denier – MD Feelings • MD caught between ideal of saving patient and unwanted wish for patient to die • Malice • Objectivity challenged by hatred, or indifference (protects MD emotionally)

  17. Self-Destructive Denier - Suggestions • MD limited because patient will only allow so much care • All reasonable care for patient • Compassion – terminal illness • Do not abandon • Recognize without shame the feelings the patient provoke in MD • Cannot give perfect care

  18. Countertransference • Physician develops positive or negative feelings toward patient based upon personal experiences in her life • Use it to gain knowledge about where patient is coming from

  19. Projective Identification • Patient feels threatened = behavioral regression • Projects these feelings onto MD • Patient feels relieved when these feelings are reflected by MD • Example: Patient feels helpless = complains incessantly = MD feels helpless • If MD recognizes can react supportively

  20. Shift in Healthcare • Patient autonomy • Patients more educated • Boundaries are being crossed by email and info about physicians on internet • Defensive medicine

  21. Parts of Healthcare System Increase “Difficult” Behavior • Productivity pressures • Changes in health care financing • Fragmentation of visits • Interrupted visits • Outside information sources challenge the physicians authority • Less trust in their physicians • Feel rushed or ignored may repeat themselves or prolong visit • 18% of encounters classified as “difficult”

  22. Physician Characteristics Who Report Higher Rates of “Difficult” Patients • Greater perceived workload/overwork • Lower job satisfaction • Lack of training in communication/poor communication skills • Inexperience • Discomfort with uncertainty • Poor attitude

  23. Reasons for Perceiving the Encounter As Difficult • Professional identity • I am unable to make better *** • Conflicts with my professional standards • Personal qualities • Feel taken advantage of • Difficulty making relationship with patient • Time management • Takes too much time • Comfort with patient autonomy • Patient sets the agenda • Confidence in skills • Too hard to solve • Trust in patient • Lose trust in patient

  24. “Difficult” Patients in New Era • Increased dissatisfaction with services • Become more demanding • Repeated visits without medical benefit • Seemingly endless complaints • Unmet expectations • Insatiable dependency • Report worsening symptoms

  25. Patient Behavior • Do not seem to want to get well • Power struggles • Focus on issues seemingly unrelated to medical care • Worried every symptom represents a serious illness • Reported greater symptom severity • Chronic pain (+/- narcotics)

  26. Patient Characteristics • Psychiatric • Axis II • Depression • Somatization (alcohol, borderline) • Mood d/o (insist on physical cause) • Anxiety (multi complaints, think cardiac, not enough being done) • Lower social class • Female • Thick clinical records • Older • More medical problems • Greater use of health care services • Poor functional status

  27. Axis II, Personality Disorders • Cluster A (odd or eccentric, fears social relations) • Paranoid • Schizoid • Schizotypal • Cluster B (dramatic, emotional erratic disorders) • Antisocial • Borderline • Histrionic • Narcissistic • Cluster C (anxious or fearful disorder) • Avoidant • Dependent • Obsessive-compulsive • Appendix B • Depressive • Passive-aggressive (negativistic)

  28. “Difficult” Group Jackson, JL, Kroenke K. Difficult Patient Encounters in the Ambulatory Clinic: Clinical Predictors and Outcomes Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1069-1075.

  29. What Happens to the MD? • Helpless • Inadequacy • Frustration • Anger • Guilt • Dislike

  30. MD Feelings • Leads to: • Unconscious punishment of the patient • Self-punishment by the doctor • Inappropriate confrontation • Desperate attempt to avoid patient • Errors in diagnosis or treatment • Decreased quality of care • Work burdensome • Burnout

  31. MD Feelings • Disproportionate emotional energy can be spent dealing with negative feelings • Strong negative emotional reaction is important clinical data about patient’s psychology (personality d/o) • Sensitivity to MD feelings • Improved physician well being • Less destructive patient behavior • Lower risk of litigation

  32. Managing Conflict by Elder • Collaboration • Appropriate use of MD power • Empathy

  33. Collaboration • Priority setting • Prioritize patient concerns • Diagnostic skills • Thorough history, physical, and testing • Decision making • Explain • Be consistent and objective • Be honest and fair • Facilitate patient decision making • Team approach • Use referrals (mental health, pain, etc.) • Enlist/see family • Provide quality care • Coaching • Set small, achievable goals • Short term symptom relief

  34. Collaboration • Encourage patient to start taking responsibility • Think of their care as a team effort • Adjust expectations of what can be accomplished • Patient education • Collaboration has most impact on clinical interaction

  35. Appropriate Use of Power • Set clinical management rules • Schedule patient frequently, longer visits • Clinic time management • Good documentation • Set boundaries and limits • Set general limits • Make explicit rules when necessary • Limit number of patient concerns • Limit time at each visit

  36. Empathy • Understand patients psyche • Focus on patient emotions • Compassionate and firm • Patient centered • Reinforce positives • Keep professional distance

  37. Empathy • Protects MD from developing negative responses to difficult and challenging behavior • Allows insight into patient issues and why patient has resorted to negative response patterns • Illness can alter patients – uncharacteristic, childlike • Creates an environment conducive to more suitable health care delivery, a healthier lifestyle, better work satisfaction

  38. Additional Recommendations • Point person - may get conflicting info from consultants • Tactful assessment of patient’s distress/emotion • LISTEN • Interrupt less • Regular, brief summaries of patient’s concerns • Reconcile conflicting views of diagnosis/illness

  39. Confrontation • Acknowledge problem • Both parties may contribute to difficulty • Use communication skills • You can discuss that have poor relationship: • “How do you feel about the care you are receiving from me?” • “It seems to me we sometimes don’t work together very well.” • Use “I” statements • “I feel it’s difficult for me to listen to you when you use that kind of language.”

  40. Questions to Ask Prior to Confrontation • 1. ***Does my patient prioritize health?*** • Not if patient works with MD to prevent and treat disease. • Unpleasantness alone is not grounds. • 2. Is confrontation of my patient ethically permissible? • If patients self-corrosive decisions come with expectations of accommodation. • If MD bearing majority of burden in failing treatment. • If health deteriorating from patient action or inaction. • 3. What if confronting my patient is emotionally gratifying? • Recognize countertransference v. projective identification. • Assess motives and emotions in real time and discuss with a peer.

  41. References • Butler CC, Evans M. The “heartsink” patient revisited. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:230-233. • Elder N, Ricer R, Tobias B. How respected family physicians manage difficult. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:533– 541. • Feldman MD, Berkowitz SA. Role of behavioral medicine in primary care. CurrOpin Psychiatry. 2012;25:121-127. • Kontos N, et al. Fighting the good fight: Responsibility and rationale in the confrontation of patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(1):63-66. • Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary J. Prognosis communication in serious illness: Perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1398-1403. • Groves JE. Taking care of the hateful patient. N Eng J Med 1978;298:883-887. • Haas LJ, Leiser JP, Magill MK, Sanyer ON. Management of the difficult patient. American Family Physician. 2005;72(10) • Jackson, JL, Kroenke K. Difficult Patient Encounters in the Ambulatory Clinic: Clinical Predictors and Outcomes Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1069-1075. • Mathers N, Jones N, Hannay D. Heartsink patients: A study of their general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:293-296. • O’Dowd TC. Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. BMJ 1988;297:528-530. • Strous RD, Ulman AM, Kotler M. The hateful patient revisited: Relevance for 21st century medicine. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2006 (17)6;387-393.

More Related