Vic Patel FAA/ATO-P

1. a t o A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N Controller-Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC)Program UpdateACP WG N4New Orleans November 2004 Vic Patel FAA/ATO-P F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

2. Agenda • Where is the CPDLC program located in the ATO ? • Why CPDLC ? • CPDLC Build 1 • CPDLC “National Build” F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

3. CPDLC in the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Chief Operating Officer Air Traffic Organization Russ Chew ATO-E Vice President En Route & Oceanic Services Rick Day (Acting) Transition Team Liaison John Thornton Directors of En Route Area Operations Osterdahl, Lyons, Trevino Director of En Route Program Operations Mike Gough Director Oceanic & Offshore Services Dave Ford Director of Safety and Operations Support Luis Ramirez Safety & Commitment Assurance Mike Gough Director of Finance & Planning Greg Burke Manager of Administration Pat Reese (Acting) F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

4. Director of En Route Program Operations Mike Gough (Acting) En Route Current Automation S. Reynolds (Acting) En Route Comm & Surveillance J. Pino (Acting) En Route Program Support M. T. Cheung En Route Future Automation R. Mendez (Acting) • ERAM • URET, CRMR, D-Pos • DSR, TMA • WARP, FISDL, CWIS • Second level support • Overall domain integration and program control • DRVSM, Enhancements • HID/NAS LAN • HOST, DARC, EBUS, ECG • Second level support • Program Office interface with performing organizations for: VTABS, VSCS Tech Refresh, BI-6, Long Range Radar • CPDLC • Second level support • BFM duties/collection for all Programs • Admin support Domain Systems Engineering R. Mendez En Route Field Support B. Hanlin En Route Facilities Management G. Oswald Program Control C. Butcher • Interface with Operations Planning and EnRoute Planning for new initiatives • Maintain and execute ITDP • Analyze and resolve ambiguous issues • Allocate needs to Programs • On-site AOS Support • Matrix Management • Facility life cycle program management of the 21 ARTCCs, the San Juan and Guam CERAPs, the HCF, and the ATCSCC • External requests portal • Integrated En Route Domain Automation Schedules F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

5. CPDLC National Build Organizational Chart En Route Communications & Surveillance Area Manager, ATO-E Joseph P. Pino (Acting) Union Liaisons Tom M. Davis – PASS Bradley Troy – NATCA CPDLC Program Manager Joseph P. Pino MITRE CAASD Frank Buck Bob Dailyda Steve Giles Software & Safety Garry Strong Operational Requirements Timothy Hancock Engineering Doug Balint Acquisition Vacant Jack Smit (AUATAC) Al Miller (AUATAC) Brian Moriarty (AUATAC) Evan Darby (WJHTC) Steve Ferra (WJHTC) Rick Cohen (WTHTC) Mark Palazzo (ZMA) Ron Tornese (MITRE) Phil Condon (MITRE) George Chandler (WJHTC) ATN - Vic Patel (WJHTC) ISS - Ruben Bigio (WJHTC) M. Murphy (Scheduling) Adrienne Scott (AUATAC) Barry Buschow (AUATAC) Training Bob Orlosky Dan Kokotkiewicz Testing (WJHTC) Evan Darby Contracting Daniel Lear Business Financial Mgmt. Teresa Wooley George Chandler Steve Ferra, Test Lead Evan Darby(WJHTC) Steve Ferra (WJHTC) Tim Hancock Logistics George G. White 2nd Level Engineering Rick Cohen Implementation Denise DeLozier Phil O’Connor (AUATAC) Anna Burner (AUATAC) F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N CPDLC Org Chart v7.3 .ppt 9-28-04

6. Why CPDLC ? • Supports FAA Flight Plan Goals and ATO Business Objectives • Increased Safety • Potential reduction of operational errors • Greater Capacity • Increased sector capacity via decreased communications workload • Increased fuel efficiency • Increased airport arrival efficiency rate • Ability to meet future ATC demands • International Leadership • Harmonization with EUROCONTROL LINK2000+ and CASCADE programs • Enables realization of benefits by other tools • Delivery of complex resolutions via Conflict Probe • Establishes an infrastructure for the future • Data link is a fundamental building block of the future NAS F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

7. CPDLC Build 1 • Ceased operations at 12:01 AM on October 1, 2004 • $3.3M annually for Miami sustainment only • Does not include FAA personnel costs • FY05 funding of $3M insufficient to sustain Miami • 24 months of successful operation with no associated OEs • Over 80,000 messages exchanged with no corruption • Approximately 16,000 operational transactions • Over 2,640 minutes of voice channel occupancy time saved • Over 800 “cleared direct” MT issued • 31 aircraft equipped with Rockwell Collins avionics • Capturing lessons learned for incorporation into formulation of national program in the ERAM time frame F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

8. CPDLC National Build • Program under investment analysis • “Opening” baseline is to develop the 4 “Build 1 Services” capturing lessons learned from Miami experience • Integrate with ERAM architecture • Develop independently and in parallel with ERAM baseline releases • Build CPDLC release on ERAM EIC then sync to available release • Benefits and alternatives analyses will examine “extensible” services • Benefits vs. “price of risk” analyses will define final program • Use ERAM-provided common services, e.g. data reduction, adaptation, software distribution, monitoring & control • Implement architectural mitigation in lieu of extensive design assurance F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

9. CPDLC National Build (cont’d) • Provide robust failure recovery and ground security solutions • Implement SARPs Edition 2 communications stack • Interoperable with EUROCONTROL Link 2000+ • Replace Build 1 R-side controller CHI and introduce D-side CHI • Introduce interfacility communications capability • 2 key sites for testing beyond WJHTC • Initial Operating Capability (IOC) at first key site in June 2010 • Deploy nationally after 2010 • Strategy requires coordination with ERAM and aviation community • First rollouts to maximum benefit areas, e.g. hubs, as practically feasible • ATN SARPS edition 3 with security future enhancements • Work closely with EUROCONTROL F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N

10. www.ato.faa.gov F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N • A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N