1 / 26

POSC 1000 Introduction to Politics

POSC 1000 Introduction to Politics. Formal Political Institutions Russell Alan Williams. Unit Five: Formal Political Institutions “ Presidential Systems ”. Required Reading: MacLean and Wood, Chapter 5 . Outline: Introduction Presidential Systems Legislative Institutions

tobias
Download Presentation

POSC 1000 Introduction to Politics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POSC 1000 Introduction to Politics Formal Political Institutions Russell Alan Williams

  2. Unit Five: Formal Political Institutions“Presidential Systems” Required Reading: • MacLean and Wood, Chapter 5. Outline: • Introduction • Presidential Systems • Legislative Institutions • Executive Institutions • Hybrid Systems - France • Conclusions

  3. 1) Introduction – Presidential Systems: • First developed in U.S. • Context: Response to royal authority =Need to limit the power of any branch of government • “Separation of Powers”:Division of power amongst several branches of government to avoid a concentration of power. • E.g. “Checks and balances” = No “executive dominance”

  4. However . . . . Also a need for state strong enough to fight off British etc. =Need for clear leader • Framers of constitution thought about a “constitutional monarchy”, but . . -> • Opted for a “President” to head executive and armed forces – chosen by “electoral college” Implication: Negotiation and compromise needed between branches of gov to get things done =Modern complaints about “political gridlock”:Lack of political progress because of partisanship and differing opinions

  5. 2) Presidential Systems: A) Legislative Institutions: “Congress”: Legislative branch of American government • Same as Parliament • “Bicameral” – upper and lower houses i) “House of Representatives”: Lower house • “Congressmen” elected for two year terms from a local “congressional district” • Electoral districts each have over ½ million voters • Allocated based on population E.g. -> California = 53 congressmen -> Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming = 1 congressman

  6. “Senate”: Upper house • “Senators” elected to six year terms • Two for each state (!) • Only 1/3 of senators face election in each 2 year election cycle – better deal than congressmen(!) • 2008 election • Must be over 30 years of age

  7. Organization of Congress: Both houses have own “officers”: • House of Representatives = Speaker of the House (majority party leader) • Senate = Vice President President Pro tempore • Committee Chairs (from majority party) • Floor leaders • Majority leader • Minority leader

  8. Functions of Congress: A) Responsible for passing all legislation and budgets • Can initiate own legislation - Either house . . . requires coordination • Can also support or defeat presidential proposals - E.g. the budget, or declaration of war etc. =High level of independence • President cannot call an election if bills are being defeated • Congress cannot “defeat” the President’s cabinet • Result: Most activity requires compromise or “Political gridlock” • E.g. Budgets and “log rolling”

  9. Functions of Congress: B) Oversight power • Can conduct investigations into executive activities ->E.g. conduct of war in Iraq • Hold hearings • Ratify presidential appointees -> Supreme Court Justices, Ambassadors, etc. • Not a formality! E.g. George Bush Sr. . . . • Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill

  10. Behavior of Congress: • Independence – Congress often pursues policy irrespective of who is president • Weak ”Party discipline” ????? • Committee chairs often very independent • Members “vote their own conscience” • Problems: • Influence of money on individual members • E.g. . . . .

  11. Source Common Cause (2001); Cited as FEC statistics.

  12. Behavior of Congress: • Other Problems: • Accountability of parties to voters • What does the party label mean? • President cannot always rely on his own party E.g. Obama and democratic congressional congress

  13. Presidential Systems Cont. B) Executive Institutions: Presidency: =Head of State =Head of Government • President’s cabinet manages the executive branch of government • Budgets and administration • A.K.A. “the decider”

  14. Presidential power: • “Commander and Chief” of military forces • Appoints Supreme Court judges, Ambassadors and cabinet ministers • Subject to congressional oversight . . . . • Can effectively decide to go to war or not . . . . • E.g. “Gulf of Tonkin Incidents” (1964) =Vietnam War

  15. Presidential power cont. . . . . • “Veto”: Act of blocking a decision – In U.S. = the Presidential power to prevent enactment of legislation • Congressional bills can be blocked if president does not like them • E.g. “Stem Cell Research” Bush Vetoed 2X • However: • Veto can be overridden by 2/3 votes in congress • Congress can retaliate by not passing budget or putting “riders” in presidential legislation

  16. Presidential System • “Separation of Powers”: Presidents may often have less power than prime ministers in parliamentary system – this was the intention! • However, this can lead to “political gridlock” if parties are ideologically divided and control different branches of government.

  17. 3) Hybrid Systems: • “Semi-Presidential Systems”: A system in which an elected President shares power with an elected Prime Minster and Cabinet • Prime minister and cabinet elected from legislature • Borrows “best” of both systems • In practice can result in very different dynamics . . . . • Example = France

  18. Legislative institutions: • Parliament: Bicameral - Makes legislation and passes budget • National Assembly = House of Commons • 577 “Deputies” elected in majoritarian system • Runoff ballot of leading candidates • Has often failed to produce parliamentary majorities • Senate = Indirectly elected (powers are limited) • Chosen by local governments

  19. Executive Institutions: • President = elected (through a majoritarian “runoff” electoral system) • President has always received at least 50% of votes • Gets five year term and can run again and again . . . . • President selects Prime Minster from National Assembly • Prime Minster selects cabinet = Government • Should be leader of most popular party • PM’s cabinet must enjoy the support of the legislature • Cabinet can be defeated -Result: President must select a new PM

  20. Implications in practice: France has: • Elected head of state • Some “separation of powers” • Some “fusion of powers” • Neither President or Prime Minister has power of Canadian PM . . . .

  21. Implications in practice: France has: • Elected head of state • Some “separation of powers” • Some “fusion of powers” • Neither President or Prime Minister has power of Canadian PM . . . . • Governing may require American-style negotiation • Depends on the “Party System”!

  22. When President’s party controls legislature (National Assembly), the president has considerable power • E.g. Prime Minster effectively works for the president

  23. When President’s party does not control the National Assembly . . . things more complicated • If President’s party does not have majority = negotiation and compromise with other parties • If another party has majority =“Cohabitation”: Sharing of power between French President and Prime Ministers of different parties • E.g. Francois Mitterrand and his conservative Prime Ministers . . . .

  24. 4) Conclusions on Presidential Systems: • Pure presidential systems relatively common and seem to be successful • Fewer demands for major institutional change in presidential systems than in parliamentary systems • Hybrid systems that incorporate parliamentary government have encountered difficulty • Often presidents end up abusing powers to overcome “gridlock” • Institutions are more unstable = less “legitimacy” • E.g. Russia – Vladimir Putin

  25. For next time: Midterm Exam – Covers all of Units 1 – 5. Focus on learning the “key” terms

More Related