1 / 23

An Enterprise Architecture Approach to Options Analysis in Large Acquisition Programmes

An Enterprise Architecture Approach to Options Analysis in Large Acquisition Programmes. Mr E. Fintan HANBURY – Thales CIPHER Team - Capability Director. Introduction. Programme Overview. The Programme – CIPHER Assessment Phase

tolinka
Download Presentation

An Enterprise Architecture Approach to Options Analysis in Large Acquisition Programmes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Enterprise Architecture Approach to Options Analysis in Large Acquisition Programmes

  2. Mr E. Fintan HANBURY – Thales CIPHER Team - Capability Director Introduction

  3. Programme Overview • The Programme – CIPHER Assessment Phase • The Thales CIPHER team (Thales, BT, Fujitsu) is one of two consortium conducting a competitive assessment of a full range of Options for delivery commencing in 2010 • CIPHER is not just a technology project - the Options being assessed include varying degrees of business change, outsourcing, service-orientation and potential paradigm shifts in the technology used for information assurance • The CIPHER Programme, encompasses 3 Projects • MOD’s Future Crypto Programme (FCP) • MOD’s Interoperable Electronic Key Distribution Project (IKED) • CESG’s Security Management Infrastructure (SMI) project

  4. Security Classification • Some aspects of the CIPHER Programme are classified up to TOP SECRET (STRAP) • This presentation is limited to UNCLASSIFIED material and therefore there may be areas of interest that cannot be covered and questions that cannot be answered

  5. Scope of CIPHER • CIPHER Single Statement of User Need (SSUN): A capability that provides a management infrastructure for all grades of devices to meet the needs of UK MOD and wider government, and high grade cryptographic devices for UK MOD to meet the communication, confidentiality, availability, interoperability and data integrity needs of UK MOD for NEC, Defence Business and Operations • This means CIPHER must provide: • All High Grade cryptographic services for UK MoD • IA Service levels to meet the needs of the UK MoD for Defence Business & Operations • A pan-Government Security Management Infrastructure that will allow future IA components (e.g. firewalls, cryptographic functions and authentication services) to be initialised, configured, updated, and managed in a trusted & secure way

  6. Mr Mike DUFFY – Thales CIPHER Team – Methods & Tools Manager Introduction

  7. Thales View of CIPHER . • VISION: A single information assured architecture • MISSION: To deliver assurance to a secure and coherent information infrastructure at minimum whole-life cost while maintaining continuity of service to other CIPHER stakeholders

  8. An Integrated Reference Model of Information Assurance • IA comprises Components of Capability • IA Capability is more than just technical products assembled according to System Engineering principles. • It is about a Life-cycle that continuously integrates all Enterprise Components to match levels of assurance to the value of the information being protected • No distinction between High-grade and Baseline IA as both levels encompass all IA Components of Capability. • Only difference is the relative mix of Service and Enterprise Components to achieve the required level of Assurance

  9. The Starting Point - The Options Space to be explored • Phase A – Defines and Assesses 12 Options • Phase B – Defines 4 Refined Options ( Rank + ‘Blend’ + ‘Distil’) • Phase C – Assesses 4 Refined Options

  10. Dealing with Complexity • Given the complexity and multi-disciplinary nature of defining, assessing and comparing diverse options requires an innovative but structured approach to Options Assessment • The Thales Concept of Analysis employs: • Reference Models covering all aspects of IA to ensure consistency between Options • Enterprise Architecture to help structure and analyse Options using: • MODAF rules for developing EA products to represent Options • TOGAF to provide robust EA development environment • Soft Systems Methodology to provide Conceptual Frameworks to aid understanding of the problem space • COEIA based approach to determine Cost-Benefit ranking of Options and to support CIPHER Main Gate Business Case

  11. Reference Models to Define, Tune & Assess Options

  12. A Generic Enterprise Capability Reference Model

  13. Use of MODAF Views in CIPHER Assessment Phase • Phase A avoids solutioneering by generating logical Views of Options • Phase C to produce Views required for Delivery & Through-Life Support

  14. Soft Systems Methodology – Conceptual Enterprise Model • SSM uses a Generic Enterprise Reference Model and a set of Root Definitions (i.e. Statements of Purpose) as the basis for developing a Conceptual Activity Model of WHAT an Enterprise should be doing • Thales regards SSM Root Definition=MODAF StV-1 (Enterprise Vision)

  15. CIPHER Phase A - Sources of Thales Generated EA Views

  16. AV-1 – Overview and Summary Information MODAF (v1.2): AV-1 is usually a structured text that should provide executive-level summary informationincluding assumptions, constraints, and limitations that may affect any architecture-based work programme. The Eco System View: AV-1 should also provide a depiction of the IA environment Thales believes is best achieved by including a structured model of that environment

  17. AV-1: Thales IA Blueprint – Pan Government Eco System

  18. Eco System provides for Dynamic Communities of Interest

  19. StV-1 – Enterprise Vision • MODAF (v1.2): The purpose of an StV-1 is to provide a strategic context for the capabilities described in the Architecture. It also provides a high-level scope for the Architecture which is more general than the scenario-based scope defined in OV-1. • SSM Root Definition: A structured, Enterprise-level statement of purpose that contains the following explicit components: • Customer or beneficiary of Enterprise endeavour • Actors who undertake processes within the Enterprise • Transformation – the Enterprise’s primary input/output process • Perceptions of purpose likely to shape the Enterprise • Owner – the wider system decision-maker (or Chief Exec) • Environmental factors likely to constrain the Enterprise

  20. StV-4 – Capability Dependencies • MODAF (V1.2) – The purpose of StV-4 is to describe the dependencies between planned capabilities and defines logical groupings of capabilities (Capability Clusters) • SSM Enterprise Model (conceptual) - comprises a set of interdependent sub-systems where each sub-system: • Is made up of a group of interdependent activities • Represents a component of Enterprise Capability • Has a boundary determined by control system theory

  21. IA Sector Enterprise Dependency Model (StV-4) • StV-4 = SSM derived Model presented at sub-system level • Activity aspect within sub-systems provides basis for OV-5 Views • Sub-systems also form basis for MODAF enterprise nodes (OV-2) • There are currently 5 of these Reference Models: • IA Authority • IA Sector (producer) • IA Delivery • Defence (User) • OGD (Generic User)

  22. CIPHER ‘Interdependency’ Model • The following 4 x Conceptual Activity Models support the analysis of a version of the MOD’s CIPHER ‘Interdependency’ Model: • IA Sector • IA Delivery • MOD • Generic Government Department (OGD)

  23. Benefits identified in using an EA based approach • Identifies relationships between business, information, system and technical aspects of various Options • Supports URD (WHAT) analysis and SRD (HOW) development • Supports Impact Analysis of IA driven Business Transformation • Encourages diverse Stakeholder engagement at all stages • Enables rapid ‘WHAT-IF’ re-scoping of programme boundaries • Better understanding of dependencies and environmental constraints • Supports a structured and disciplined analysis environment • Facilitates coherency & consistency across design and analysis activities • Multi-disciplinary communication channel within the team • Initiates development of a referencable Through-Life repository • Provides an audit trail and supports configuration management • BUT…. EA and Reference Models are only tools to support design and analysis – they are NOT a substitute for expertise

More Related