1 / 24

Paper to Electronic Images: Tips for a Successful Credential File Conversion

Paper to Electronic Images: Tips for a Successful Credential File Conversion. Reid Kallman Assistant University Registrar. Private research University founded in 1891 Our student body 6,689 undergraduates 8,201 graduate students Approx. # of student records

tova
Download Presentation

Paper to Electronic Images: Tips for a Successful Credential File Conversion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Paper to Electronic Images: Tips for a Successful Credential File Conversion Reid Kallman Assistant University Registrar

  2. Private research University founded in 1891 Our student body 6,689 undergraduates 8,201 graduate students Approx. # of student records Microfilm transcripts1891-1985: 480,287 images Paper credential files: 700,000 images, est. Stanford University

  3. Student Records Systems at Stanford • PeopleSoft SA 9.0 • Including PS Portal • Recently Upgraded to PS 9.0 in August 2008 • OnBase Document Imaging 5.2 • UG Admissions began using system in 2005 • Registrar’s Office began system in 2006

  4. The Old Way … Where we WERE! Old Student Credentials Files stored in two ways: • Paper documents in files • Microfilm rolls

  5. Downsides! • Long-Term Paper Storage Practices • Lost or misplaced records • Massive storage problems • Destructibility • Staff time • Microfilm • Deterioration of image quality • Deterioration of records • Staff time • Mechanical issues … who knows how to fix this thing??!!

  6. The NEW Way … Where we ARE! • Current Student Credentials files stored in two ways: • Electronic images accessed via computers • Paper forms in file folders for short term quick reference and eventual disposal

  7. Electronic Imaging of Documents • Benefits of the New Way: • Quick and easy access to documents • Single document reference by staff at same time • Images last longer • Increased security • Improved audit and control • Prevents and protects against misplaced or lost records

  8. Phase I:Establishing Document Retention & Disposal Policy • Stanford relied onAACRAO’s Guide for Retention and Disposal of Student Records • 5 standards for establishing a policy • Phase I: 1. Identify need 2. Inventory of records 3. Appraisal and categorization Phase II: 4. Creation and Implementation 5. Review and modification of program

  9. Step 1: Identify Need • Institutional Needs • State, federal, or local laws governing retention practices? • Security and accessibility of student records? • Amount of physical storage space available? • Administration / Management / Staff Needs • How frequently do staff, management, administration access records? • On what media are students records currently maintained? • How long does your school currently retain documents? • What type of forms are in each record? • Different versions of same form? • Student Needs • What is the process for students to view their file? • Can this be accommodated or improved?

  10. Step 2: Inventory of Records • Identify old storage methods • Stanford had two storage methods: • Paper credential records • Current students: folders pulled after degree conferral • Microfilmed records • Old student credentials & official transcripts • Identify inventory within each storage medium • What are the current filing/storage methods? • What are the names of forms that currently exist? • Are these records official records or copies? • Frequency of record reference and updates?

  11. Step3: Appraisal and Categorization • Identify significance of each type of record • Administrative, Fiscal, Legal, Historical • Initial records appraisal steps taken by Stanford • Committee includes registrar, managers, legal, & staff • AACRAO’s records retention guide used as springboard • Categorization • Stanford sorted by academic appropriate category, form type, and retention period

  12. Step 4: Creation and Implementation • Steps 1-3 led to the creation of a Master Document Retention Spreadsheet for staff reference • Stanford determined: • Forms will be stored for reasonable lengths of time: • quarter, year, 5 years, permanent • Scanned forms • 5 years, permanent • Eventual disposal • Paper forms filed & stored for reference • quarter, year

  13. Stanford’s Master Retention Spreadsheet

  14. Phase II:Document Imaging of Paper & Microfilmed Records • Decide on software & vendor • Software • User friendly • Compatibility with student information system • Technical features: security, back up, audit • Vendors: • Gather information – proximity, reputation, etc • Feedback from other schools’ experiences • Quotes from multiple vendors

  15. OnBase: Hyland Worldwide Headquarters 28500 Clemens Road Westlake, OH 44145 Phone: 440-788-5000 http://www.onbase.com microMEDIA Imaging Systems, Inc. 1979 Marcus Avenue Lake Success, NY 11042 Phone: 516-355-0300 http://www.imagingservices.com Stanford Vendor and Software Choices

  16. Step 4: Creation and Implementation • Develop project plan for document imaging implementation • Set goals and timelines • Small victories along the way • Begin with high priority documents • Microfilm transcripts • Paper documents of current student records • Then lower priority documents • Student file folders – alumni • microfilmed student credentials

  17. Step 5: Review and Modification of the Program • Review and update your newly established policy • Have new forms been added? • Have old forms been phased out? • Records retention decisions • Did they prove more/less useful than originally thought? • Did staff reference paper forms more than expected? • Next step • Improved software that might benefit you even more • Stanford is looking at Nolij • PS integration, Higher Ed Based

  18. What We Learned at Stanford • Learn from other schools and gather feedback before making any decisions! • Best practices • Costs incurred • Staff requirements • Tips / suggestions

  19. Best Practices • Prioritize order of imaging! • First: Highly accessed docs & active student records • Microfilmed transcripts • Current forms related to current student records • Later: Less accessed documents • Microfilmed credentials • Stay on top of incoming forms • Hired Help vs. Staff scanning • Big picture • Registrar’s office can be guide for other offices on campus, workflow, retention practices, etc.

  20. Costs • Factors • Employee costs • full time, temporary, and student workers • Licensing, software, and hardware • Other third party vendor services • Shipping costs and supplies • Converting microfilmed records to images • Converting paper records to images

  21. Staff Requirements and Suggestions • Use student workers and temp help for: • Prepping folders • Taking inventory • Organizing documents • Scanning documents • Staff training • Train staff at appropriate time, early enough that they can understand system for go live, but not before actual implementation

  22. Tips for a Successful Implementation • Approach project one step at a time • Volume can be overwhelming • Thorough testing of processes • Work through technical specs & kinks with vendor at beginning to prevent issues in later stages • Develop system for obtaining off site student records • Multiple contacts at institution and vendor • Significance of the project • Student records are important, highly sensitive information: • Be cautious, methodical, and accurate • Don’t rush the project

  23. Are You Ready? • Do you have anoutdated paper or microfilm storage process? • Do you haveexecutive sponsorship(e.g., funding)? • Do you haveappropriate staffing to implement the project? • Do you havestaff to troubleshoot and provide support? • Do you have establisheddocument retention policy? • Do you have an outdated paper or microfilm storage process? • Do you have executive sponsorship (e.g., funding)? • Do you have appropriate staffing to implement the project? • Do you have staff to troubleshoot and provide support? • Do you have established document retention policy?

  24. Questions and Answers Reid Kallman Assistant University Registrar, Stanford University reidk@stanford.edu

More Related