1 / 32

1. INTRODUCTION

SEDIMENTATION HAZARD AND RESERVOIR PLANNING IN THE AMHARA REGION: A CASE STUDY ON ANGEREB WATERSHED. 1. INTRODUCTION. 4. LIMITATIONS. Absence of Topo map of Gondar area at scale of 1:50,000 (1237A 1 -A 4 ) Absence of previous study documents (Angereb watershed).

trevor
Download Presentation

1. INTRODUCTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SEDIMENTATION HAZARD AND RESERVOIR PLANNING IN THE AMHARA REGION:A CASE STUDY ON ANGEREB WATERSHED

  2. 1. INTRODUCTION

  3. 4. LIMITATIONS • Absence of Topo map of Gondar area at scale of 1:50,000 (1237A1-A4) • Absence of previous study documents (Angereb watershed)

  4. 6. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT • To assess sedimentation hazard of the region • To compare the empirical formulas with respect to the actual values so as to aware designers, planners and policy makers

  5. 3. METHODOLOGY METHODS • The watershed was divided in to 8 main and 5 smaller sub watersheds • Results in 260 mapping units • Data (such as land use, soil depth, color, infiltration, stoniness etc) were collected from each sub watersheds • Catchment morphology,drainage parameters such as • Soil loss and sediment yields were analyzed based on the worst condition of the factors

  6. … CONTINUED • Field observation • Questionnaire • Focus group discussion • Review of secondary data sources • Problem tree analysis • Microsoft excel, Arc View & Arc Info • Bathymetric measurement

  7. MATERIALS • Aerial Photo of scale 1:50,000 • Table Stereoscope, Digital Planimeter, Clinometers, • Computer and its accessories • Topo-map of scale 1:50,000 (Code 1237B3) • Others ( like digitizing board)

  8. 2. BACKGROUND OF STUDY AREA LOCATION • Found in North Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. • Located at about 748 and 180 km from Addis Ababa and Bahir Dar, respectively. • Lie between UTM of N 1394096, N 1407336, E 328073 and E 337991 • Altitude ranges from 2100 to 2870 m.a.s.l

  9. ….BACKGROUND • ANGEREB WATERSHED • 29,148 People • 10 Kebeles (7 Rural & 3 Urban) (i.e., Lay Armachiho 5, Gondar Zuria 2 and Gondar city 3 Kebeles) • 103 Villages (49 within & 54 outside)

  10. …BACKGROUND CLIMATE AND AGRO-ECOLOGY • Annual rainfall from 711.8 to 1822.42 mm • Mean annual rainfall is 1159.22 mm • Mean monthly temperature from 180C to 220C • Agro-ecology Moist Woina Dega (dominant)

  11. …BACKGROUND TOPOGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGY • Mountainous & rugged south facing • Oval in shape • Dendritic drainage pattern • Steep ridges at the boundary • Numerous convex hills & steep gorges inside

  12. …BACKGROUND GEOLOGY • Extensive area of Volcanic rocks • Ashangi Group of the early Tertiary Age • Consist of Basaltic flows • Deeply eroded • Are not permeable • Water moves through fractures • Along the horizontal contacts between the flows

  13. …BACKGROUND HYDROLOGY • Abay river basin & Megech river sub basin • Ample rainfall but erratic in nature • Several small streams and springs • Rivers: Angereb, Kaha, korebreb Shenta and Demaza

  14. …BACKGROUND SOILS • Dominant soils are shallow Cambisol • underlain by unconsolidated medium sized gravels • underlain by watertight rocky layers • Silty clay loam and silty clay texture • Brown color (dominant) • Soil depths are between 25 and 100 cm

  15. …BACKGROUND LAND USE PATTERN (7,624 ha) • Cultivated = 69.1% • Grazing = 4.8% • Forest = 10.6% • Bush = 7.2% • Scrub = 3.9% • Settlement = 4.2% • Wet land = 0.3% • Total 100.00%

  16. L E G E N D B u s h l a n d F o r e s t l a n d G r a z i n g l a n d I n t e n s i v e l y c u l t i v a t e d M o d e r a t e l y c u l t i v a t e d R e s e r v o i r S c r u b l a n d S 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 K i l o m e t e r s …BACKGROUND L A N D U S E / C O V E R M A P O F A N G E R E B W . S N W E S e t t l e m e n t S p a r s e l y c u l t i v a t e d

  17. IMPORTANT DRAINAGE PARAMETER

  18. Important morphological charac.

  19. LAND FORM OF EACH SUB WATERSHED

  20. MAJOR CATHMENT FEATURES • Dissected catchment • Circular • Steep slope cultivation • Pollutants • All these results in high • -runoff • -sedimentation • -pollution

  21. SOIL EROSION HAZARD ASSESSMENT • Erosion hazard - Soil Loss and Sediment Yield Estimation -Using USLE, A= RKLSCP A = Average annual soil loss (ton/ha) R = Rainfall erosivity K = Soil erodibility S = Slope length factor C = Cover factor P = Management factor

  22. Average soil loss rates before and after treatment for each sub watershed

  23. SEDIMENT YIELD Sr = Sediment yield (ton) at the watershed out let E = total erosion (ton) A = Watershed area (ha) (1/A0.2) = delivery ratio (0.167) Thus, Sr = 546,454.24*(1/7623.92 0.2) = 91,436.19 ton/yr • With trap efficiency 95% (90 to 98%. ) Sr= 91436.19*0.95 Sr= 86,864.383ton/yr (86,864,383.01kg/yr) • Finally it will be 83,389.81 m3/yr with 20% bed load • But the actual (bathymetric survey) result shows the sediment load is 128400 m3/yr

  24. SEDIMENTATION PERIODS

  25. NO PARAMETERS SHAWEL, 1999 Angereb TC, 2004 1 Sedimentation rate- Estimation 124000 m3/yr 83389.81 m3/yr 2 Sedimentation rate- Actual survey 120000 m3/yr 128400 m3/yr 3 Sediment accumulated-Estimation 1.364 Mm3 0.9173 Mm3 4 Sediment accumulated-Actual 1.32 Mm3 (25%) 1.412 Mm3(27%) ESTIMATED SEDIMENT LOAD IN TWO SCENARIOS

  26. Conditions Service Life years up to With out watershed treatment & with out flood flushing 6 2010 With out watershed treatment & with flood flushing 8 2012 With watershed treatment & with out flood flushing 7 2011 With watershed treatment & with flood flushing 10 2014 …CONTINUED Service life of Angereb reservoir

  27. … …CONTINUED

  28. SERVICE LIFE OF ANGEREB RESERVOIR • Under sluice gate of the dam should be kept open from June 15 to August 20 each year. • Total of 7,869,312m3 of water is expected to be released • The sediment volume is reasonably assumed to be 1% of the water volume, Amounting to 78,690m3

  29. 16. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSION From the analysis results • It is indicated that • a great deal of runoff at the outlet point • the sediment yield is much more than the calculated value using empirical formula i.e. our estimation of sediment yield is much more less than the actual value

  30. …CONTINUED • watershed treatment can reduce sediment loads of the reservoir • Flushing is much more advantageous than catchment treatment • But using both of them is effective in reducing reservoir sedimentation so as to sustain life of the dam .

  31. … CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION • Mechanism like sluice gate, bypass structures should be provided for earth dams for minimum sediment deposit in each season. • Under sluice gate of the dam should be kept open for some time each year. • There should be some method appropriate for the region in designing and planning reservoirs. • Open for discussion!

  32. THANK YOU!

More Related