1 / 215

Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction

Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction. David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Supported in part by NSF DUE #9981140 and PHY-#0406724. Student Learning of Thermodynamics.

trula
Download Presentation

Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Students’ Reasoning Regarding Fundamental Concepts in Thermodynamics: Implications for Instruction David E. Meltzer Department of Physics and Astronomy Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Supported in part by NSF DUE #9981140 and PHY-#0406724

  2. Student Learning of Thermodynamics • There have been more than 200 investigations of pre-college students’ learning of thermodynamics concepts, all showing serious conceptual difficulties. • Recently published study of university students showed substantial difficulty with work concept and with the first law of thermodynamics. M.E. Loverude, C.H. Kautz, and P.R.L. Heron, Am. J. Phys. 70, 137 (2002). • Until now there has been no detailed study of thermodynamics knowledge of students in introductory (first-year) calculus-based general physics course.

  3. Student Learning of Thermodynamics • There have been more than 200 investigations of pre-college students’ learning of thermodynamics concepts. • Recently published study of university students showed substantial difficulty with work concept and with the first law of thermodynamics. M.E. Loverude, C.H. Kautz, and P.R.L. Heron, Am. J. Phys. 70, 137 (2002). • Until now there has been no detailed study of thermodynamics knowledge of students in introductory (first-year) calculus-based general physics course.

  4. Student Learning of Thermodynamics • There have been more than 200 investigations of pre-college students’ learning of thermodynamics concepts. • Recently published study of university students showed substantial difficulty with work concept and with the first law of thermodynamics. M.E. Loverude, C.H. Kautz, and P.R.L. Heron, Am. J. Phys. 70, 137 (2002). • Until now there has been no detailed study of thermodynamics knowledge of students in introductory (first-year) calculus-based general physics course.

  5. Student Learning of Thermodynamics • There have been more than 200 investigations of pre-college students’ learning of thermodynamics concepts. • Recently published study of university students showed substantial difficulty with work concept and with the first law of thermodynamics. M.E. Loverude, C.H. Kautz, and P.R.L. Heron, Am. J. Phys. 70, 137 (2002). • Until now there has been only limited study of thermodynamics knowledge of students in introductory (first-year) calculus-based general physics course.

  6. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  7. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  8. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  9. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  10. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  11. Research Basis for Curriculum Development (NSF CCLI Project with T. Greenbowe) • Investigation of second-semester calculus-based physics course (mostly engineering students). • Written diagnostic questions administered last week of class in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (Ntotal= 653). • Detailed interviews (avg. duration  one hour) carried out with 32 volunteers during 2002 (total class enrollment: 424). • interviews carried out after all thermodynamics instruction completed • final grades of interview sample far above class average [two course instructors,  20 recitation instructors]

  12. Grade Distributions: Interview Sample vs. Full Class

  13. Grade Distributions: Interview Sample vs. Full Class Interview Sample: 34% above 91st percentile; 50% above 81st percentile

  14. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Failure to recognize “work” as a mechanism of energy transfer. • Confusion regarding isothermal processes and the thermal “reservoir.” • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  15. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  16. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  17. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  18. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  19. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  20. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  21. Understanding of Concept of State Function in the Context of Energy • Diagnostic question: two different processes connecting identical initial and final states. • Do students realize that only initial and final states determine change in a state function?

  22. Understanding of Concept of State Function in the Context of Energy • Diagnostic question: two different processes connecting identical initial and final states. • Do students realize that only initial and final states determine change in a state function?

  23. Understanding of Concept of State Function in the Context of Energy • Diagnostic question: two different processes connecting identical initial and final states. • Do students realize that only initial and final states determine change in a state function?

  24. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  25. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  26. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  27. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  28. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: U1 = U2 [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  29. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: U1 = U2 [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  30. Students seem to have adequate grasp of state-function concept • Consistently high percentage (70-90%) of correct responses on relevant questions. • Large proportion of correct explanations. • Interview subjects displayed good understanding of state-function idea. Students’ major conceptual difficulties stemmed from overgeneralization of state-function concept.

  31. Students seem to have adequate grasp of state-function concept • Consistently high percentage (70-90%) of correct responses on written question, with good explanations. • Interview subjects displayed good understanding of state-function idea. Students’ major conceptual difficulties stemmed from overgeneralization of state-function concept.

  32. Students seem to have adequate grasp of state-function concept • Consistently high percentage (70-90%) of correct responses on written question, with good explanations. • Interview subjects displayed good understanding of state-function idea. Students’ major conceptual difficulties stemmed from overgeneralization of state-function concept.

  33. Students seem to have adequate grasp of state-function concept • Consistently high percentage (70-90%) of correct responses on written question with good explanations. • Interview subjects displayed good understanding of state-function idea. Students’ major conceptual difficulties stemmed from overgeneralization of state-function concept.

  34. Students seem to have adequate grasp of state-function concept • Consistently high percentage (70-90%) of correct responses on written question, with good explanations. • Interview subjects displayed good understanding of state-function idea. Students’ major conceptual difficulties stemmed from overgeneralization of state-function concept.Details to follow . . .

  35. Predominant Themes of Students’ Reasoning • Understanding of concept of state function in the context of energy. • Belief that work is a state function. • Belief that heat is a state function. • Belief that net work done and net heat transferred during a cyclic process are zero. • Inability to apply the first law of thermodynamics.

  36. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  37. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  38. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  39. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: W1 > W2 [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  40. This P-V diagram represents a system consisting of a fixed amount of ideal gas that undergoes two different processes in going from state A to state B: W1 > W2 [In these questions, Wrepresents the work done bythe system during a process; Qrepresents the heat absorbed by the system during a process.] 1. Is W for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? Explain. 2. Is Q for Process #1 greater than, less than, or equal tothat for Process #2? 3. Which would produce the largest change in the total energy of all the atoms in the system: Process #1, Process #2, or both processes produce the same change?

  41. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question)

  42. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question)

  43. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question)

  44. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question) *explanations not required in 1999

  45. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question) *explanations not required in 1999

  46. Responses to Diagnostic Question #1 (Work question) *explanations not required in 1999

  47. Explanations Given by Interview Subjects to Justify W1 = W2 • “Work is a state function.” • “No matter what route you take to get to state B from A, it’s still the same amount of work.” • “For work done take state A minus state B; the process to get there doesn’t matter.” Many students come to associate work with properties (and descriptive phrases) only used by instructors in connection with state functions.

  48. Explanations Given by Interview Subjects to Justify W1 = W2 • “Work is a state function.” • “No matter what route you take to get to state B from A, it’s still the same amount of work.” • “For work done take state A minus state B; the process to get there doesn’t matter.” Many students come to associate work with properties (and descriptive phrases) only used by instructors in connection with state functions.

  49. Explanations Given by Interview Subjects to Justify W1 = W2 • “Work is a state function.” • “No matter what route you take to get to state B from A, it’s still the same amount of work.” • “For work done take state A minus state B; the process to get there doesn’t matter.” Many students come to associate work with properties (and descriptive phrases) only used by instructors in connection with state functions.

  50. Explanations Given by Interview Subjects to Justify W1 = W2 • “Work is a state function.” • “No matter what route you take to get to state B from A, it’s still the same amount of work.” • “For work done take state A minus state B; the process to get there doesn’t matter.” Many students come to associate work with properties (and descriptive phrases) only used by instructors in connection with state functions.

More Related