1 / 14

Perspectives & Experiences from the Himalayas- Sustainable Agriculture in the mountains

This study explores the prospects and problems of sustainable agriculture in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region. It covers the period from 1988-1991 and focuses on Nepal, Himachal Pradesh (India), West Sichuan (China), and the North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan. The study examines the factors affecting performance, the decline in agricultural production from 1940-1990, conditions in mountain agriculture, traditional systems, state interventions, and their consequences.

tsweet
Download Presentation

Perspectives & Experiences from the Himalayas- Sustainable Agriculture in the mountains

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives & Experiences from the Himalayas- Sustainable Agriculture in the mountains • Prospects and problems in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan (HKH) region, based on studies dating back to 1988-1991 • Location of these ecosystems: Nepal, Himachal Pradesh (India), West Sichuan (China), North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan

  2. Two useful definitions and related factors • SUSTAINABILITY: The ability of a system to maintain/enhance performance over time without affecting its long-run potential • PERFORMANCE: The range and quality of production and income-generation options • What affects performance? • 1-the ability of the biophysical resource base to handle high levels & complex mixes of inputs • 2-links with other systems: institutions, technological innovations, policies

  3. Agricultural Production 1940-1990 • Compared to the 1940s, the situation has gradually declined: • 1- landslides and riverbank cutting are more frequent • 2- lower biodiversity • 3- poisonous and unusable plants are now more common in the forests • 4- lower water flow for grinding mills and irrigation • 5- eroded topsoil on the slopes • 6- traditional cultivation (terraces) less common • 7- diversified farming practices more difficult to undertake • 8- major crop yields are lower • 9- longer interseason food deficit period • 10- poverty-induced outmigration is more frequent

  4. Conditions in Mountain Agriculture • MOUNTAIN PERSPECTIVE: Understanding and explicitly considering local conditions before designing & implementing interventions in mountain areas • These conditions include: • 1-physical isolation • 2-higher transport costs • 3-poor infrastructure • Such conditions are shared by other agroecological zones, i.e.deserts and marshy coastal areas, even though they’re not so extreme

  5. Pluses and Minuses in Mountain Agriculture • MINUSES: • 1- limited capacity of the system to absorb inputs • 2- limited production opportunities • 3- limited replicability of development strategies from the plains • 4- verticality makes the region more fragile and vulnerable • 5- limits in generating agricultural surplus • 6- agriculture-related activities (e.g.: processing) discouraged, involving low or no investment • Yet,diversity of landscape could involve such • PLUS: • 1-mountain zones have an absolute advantage in some potentially “niche” activities

  6. Traditional Systems • DEFINITION: • 1-Semiclosed • 2-low population pressure • 3-production was oriented towards subsistence. • Production, consumption and exchange were equilibrated among themselves, adapted to the limits & potential of natural resources • By trial and error, low cost practices were developed • Social sanctions and common property were used to control extraction of natural resources

  7. Traditional Systems • SUSTAINABILITY OF A TRADITIONAL SYSTEM: • It modestly upgraded the resource base • Sustainability carried a heavy price tag: limited development, mere subsistence • FAILURE OF TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS: • Sustainability ceased to exist when changes were too rapid for adaptation strategies to cope: • 1-traditional supply-side control measures made inadequate by rapid population growth • 2-growth of individualistic tendencies and loosening of social sanctions • CONSEQUENCES: • 1-intensification of farming systems in the region • 2-overcropping & neglect of traditional diversification • 3-vicious circle of degradation and impoverishment

  8. State Interventions • The governments’ goals were: • 1-increase food production to feed growing population • 2-promote sole cropping by increasing dependence on external resources • this implied biochemical input subsidization & public distribution • 3-integrate mountain areas and mainstream plains by • 3.a) physical infrastructure • 3.b) market links • 3.c) administrative process

  9. Why State interventions failed • Those strategies were generally developed in non-mountain settings. • They completely ignored biological requirements • Administrative control marginalized traditional social sanctions. • The community’s role in regulating pressure on resources was completely eliminated • Only a small portion of the population gained benefits from the • potentially increased profitability of the area • This poor result did not prevent more people from abandoning fragile • lands

  10. Consequences of State interventions • Too much emphasis on food self-sufficiency, disregarding the value of diversification • Government policies targeted a narrow set of crops, marginalising important • local crops and variety • Excessive use of external inputs • Dependence on chemical inputs, not effective in labor-intensive technologies • Undermined land use diversity • Misallocation of resources at a national level • The national budget was too limited as far as mountain • research & extension were concerned

  11. Combining growth and sustainability • Reconciliation of traditional resource-extensive production systems current resource- intensive systems proved to be the key to a successful development • Evidence from Himachal Pradesh (India), Ilam (Nepal), Ningan and Miyi (China) shows that successful stories have common features: • 1- R&D, infrastructure, market facilities were provided • 2- Complementary activities were promoted, increasing biodiversity • 3-Knowingly or not, all interventions took mountain conditions into account

  12. An illustrative success story: Himachal Pradesh • Focus on horticulture as a leading sector • Investments in research and market infrastructure • Plantation of high-yielded grasses, encouraging stall-fed dairying • Promotion of beekeping to pollinate horticultural crops • Introduction of profitable angora rabbit breeding

  13. Conclusions • A two-pronged strategy is required: • 1-Promoting biomass productivity increases and resource generation • 2-Promoting agribusiness to increase options and sustainability in the long run • A policy framework to develop the two-targeted approach needs to be established

  14. Suggestions and discussion topics • State-run interventions may either prove successful or useless • Ignoring local requirement and biodiversity could lead to an • unexpected failure • Macroeconomic policies are needed: devolution or centralization? • Ignoring traditions and habits might prevent a high share of • population from feeling involved in new development plans

More Related