1 / 5

POL 1000 – Lecture 10: Federalism & Federations

POL 1000 – Lecture 10: Federalism & Federations. Sean Clark Lecturer, Memorial University Doctoral Fellow, CFPS Fall Session, 2011. Lecture Arc. 1. The division of power. Unitary. Federal. Confederal . 2. Origins of federalism. 3. Virtues of federalism.

twyla
Download Presentation

POL 1000 – Lecture 10: Federalism & Federations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POL 1000 – Lecture 10: Federalism & Federations Sean Clark Lecturer, Memorial University Doctoral Fellow, CFPS Fall Session, 2011

  2. Lecture Arc • 1. The division of power. • Unitary. • Federal. • Confederal. • 2. Origins of federalism. • 3. Virtues of federalism. • 3. Modern devolutionary pressures.

  3. Federalism • 3 basic types of power sharing arrangements. • Unitary (that is, no sharing at all) • Centralized under single authority (i.e. France, UK, China). • Are local govts, but they exist at leisure of central authority. • Federal. • Divided powers (present in US, Canada, Mexico, Germany, Brazil). • Though federal level—the centre—tends to keep defence, trade, FP, etc, plus residual powers (anything left over). Locals get health, education, etc. • Confederal. • Each political unit is an equal (early Switzerland, early US, EU). No single leader (and thus hard to keep together). • 1780s US had ‘President’, but not head of the executive—subservient to Congress. Was more of an admin aide. • Federations are generally the consequence of efforts either to: • Bring different groups into common political being (i.e. US 1789, Germany 1871); or… • Avoid an existing political unit from fracturing apart (i.e. India, Belgium). • Federalism is about the sharing of power btn levels & regions. • Powers are constitutionally-enshrined (i.e. each is sovereign, autonomous). • Change thus requires consent of both. • Federal level will generally assist in transfer of wealth btn rich & poor regions (in Canada: ‘equalization’). • When asymmetry of power is involved, conflict is inevitable. • Frustration builds the more interests diverge. Money issues are particularly divisive.

  4. Federalism, II • Virtues: offers leadership (in federal govt), but also…. • Fragments political power, creating checks & balance vs potential for absolutism. • US founding fathers were chiefly preoccupied by this. • Helps manage ethnic, cultural, & regional diversity. • Empowering local authorities protects them from abuse by the majority (was core part of Canada’s 1867 bargain). • System is dominant in N America, but not much else. • Is, however, movt towards ‘devolution,’ i.e. Spain & UK. • Argmt: local govt is better govt. • In fact, calls for devolution abound. • Saw w Nunavut. Scotland & Wales. Now in Spain. Further devolution in Belg. • However, at what point does centrifugal force threaten very existence of state? • I.e. give locals too much power, & they might just leave (i.e. Quebec, Belgium). S. Sudan has already split. • What is purpose of a common nation if everyone does their own thing anyways. • Besides, encouraging everyone to do their own thing eases way to outright separation. • Is particularly problematic when just a few equal groups. • I.e. Paraguay & Uruguay separated from Argentina; India & Pakistan; Pakistan & Bangladesh; Rhodesia w separation of Zambia & Malawi, etc. Flemish & Walloons. Cypriot Turks & Greeks. • Rather than deadlock of equals, prefer to just go on own.

More Related