1 / 6

Learning Technology Standardisation

Learning Technology Standardisation. Peter B. Sloep JISC-SURF-Internet2-meeting Oxford, Sept. 19-20 2002. Surf. SIX. Part. Univ. chair. OUNL. IMS. JISC. CETIS. Part. Univ. SIG LD. Where do I fit in?. Interop. of LT applications: standardisation.

tyne
Download Presentation

Learning Technology Standardisation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Learning Technology Standardisation Peter B. Sloep JISC-SURF-Internet2-meeting Oxford, Sept. 19-20 2002

  2. Surf SIX Part. Univ chair OUNL IMS JISC CETIS Part. Univ SIG LD Where do I fit in?

  3. Interop. of LT applications: standardisation • learning technology specifications metadata • content packaging • learning design (EML) • software architectures • reference architecture for lt specs • learning content management • portfolio management

  4. LT specification • Existing initiatives • SIX: specs follower, supports NEN (equiv of BSI) • OUNL: participation in IMS CEN/ISSS • CETIS: participation IMS, CEN/ISSS/IEEE, BSI • collaboration with OUNL • Opportunities • collaboration SIX and CETIS, participation in SIGs • economies of scales, improve quality • provide countervailing power to SCORM dominance

  5. Software architectures • Existing initiatives • some at Six level (content management system) • ‘local’initiatives: Valkenburg group (ref. archit. plus impl. projects – OUNL plus CETIS plus others) • Opportunities • scale up existing initiatives • develop common component based reference architecture • do joint middleware implementation projects: Blackboard building block for LD/EML, p2p system for learning objects, portfolio system

  6. Opportunities for collaboration • Graft projects on existing initiatives to jointly influence global lt specification processes in IMS, CEN/ISSS, IEEE. • Save money and increase quality by building middleware to the LT- specifications (example: EML/LD interpreter – building block plug in for VLEs – RELOAD in UK)

More Related